Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I wish we have the scores by income level. As it is, the Asians and Whites do much poorly in QO and NW than Wootton. Is it because the Wootton kids are from a higher SES family?
For the most part, SES is tied to test scores, but some of that can be negated by prepping for the SATs. This is what many poorer Asian students do. I don't know what the income levels of the Asian families are in QO, but there are certainly sections of QO that are more expensive than most of the Wootton cluster - Kentlands and Lakelands.
In some high schools, especially Wootton, it is very normal and extremely common to prep for the SATs. This is why SAT scores is not an adequate way to evaluate the effectiveness/success of a school.
right. it’s a little weird, though, because i’m sure in places like kentlands there is just as much SAT prep as in the wootton neighborhoods. the discrepancy among the scores within the same racial group is weird.
more families w/ $ at wootton than QO. not sure why you find it weired
Exactly, and combine that with the high pressure cooker environment, it shouldn't be a surprise at all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I wish we have the scores by income level. As it is, the Asians and Whites do much poorly in QO and NW than Wootton. Is it because the Wootton kids are from a higher SES family?
For the most part, SES is tied to test scores, but some of that can be negated by prepping for the SATs. This is what many poorer Asian students do. I don't know what the income levels of the Asian families are in QO, but there are certainly sections of QO that are more expensive than most of the Wootton cluster - Kentlands and Lakelands.
In some high schools, especially Wootton, it is very normal and extremely common to prep for the SATs. This is why SAT scores is not an adequate way to evaluate the effectiveness/success of a school.
right. it’s a little weird, though, because i’m sure in places like kentlands there is just as much SAT prep as in the wootton neighborhoods. the discrepancy among the scores within the same racial group is weird.
more families w/ $ at wootton than QO. not sure why you find it weired
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I wish we have the scores by income level. As it is, the Asians and Whites do much poorly in QO and NW than Wootton. Is it because the Wootton kids are from a higher SES family?
For the most part, SES is tied to test scores, but some of that can be negated by prepping for the SATs. This is what many poorer Asian students do. I don't know what the income levels of the Asian families are in QO, but there are certainly sections of QO that are more expensive than most of the Wootton cluster - Kentlands and Lakelands.
In some high schools, especially Wootton, it is very normal and extremely common to prep for the SATs. This is why SAT scores is not an adequate way to evaluate the effectiveness/success of a school.
right. it’s a little weird, though, because i’m sure in places like kentlands there is just as much SAT prep as in the wootton neighborhoods. the discrepancy among the scores within the same racial group is weird.
more families w/ $ at wootton than QO. not sure why you find it weired
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I wish we have the scores by income level. As it is, the Asians and Whites do much poorly in QO and NW than Wootton. Is it because the Wootton kids are from a higher SES family?
For the most part, SES is tied to test scores, but some of that can be negated by prepping for the SATs. This is what many poorer Asian students do. I don't know what the income levels of the Asian families are in QO, but there are certainly sections of QO that are more expensive than most of the Wootton cluster - Kentlands and Lakelands.
In some high schools, especially Wootton, it is very normal and extremely common to prep for the SATs. This is why SAT scores is not an adequate way to evaluate the effectiveness/success of a school.
right. it’s a little weird, though, because i’m sure in places like kentlands there is just as much SAT prep as in the wootton neighborhoods. the discrepancy among the scores within the same racial group is weird.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I wish we have the scores by income level. As it is, the Asians and Whites do much poorly in QO and NW than Wootton. Is it because the Wootton kids are from a higher SES family?
For the most part, SES is tied to test scores, but some of that can be negated by prepping for the SATs. This is what many poorer Asian students do. I don't know what the income levels of the Asian families are in QO, but there are certainly sections of QO that are more expensive than most of the Wootton cluster - Kentlands and Lakelands.
In some high schools, especially Wootton, it is very normal and extremely common to prep for the SATs. This is why SAT scores is not an adequate way to evaluate the effectiveness/success of a school.
right. it’s a little weird, though, because i’m sure in places like kentlands there is just as much SAT prep as in the wootton neighborhoods. the discrepancy among the scores within the same racial group is weird.
Anonymous wrote:Richard Montgomery (around 125 students are in the IB magnet)
AS 1941
B 1467
H 1547
W 1873
And 25 of them are RM cluster students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I wish we have the scores by income level. As it is, the Asians and Whites do much poorly in QO and NW than Wootton. Is it because the Wootton kids are from a higher SES family?
For the most part, SES is tied to test scores, but some of that can be negated by prepping for the SATs. This is what many poorer Asian students do. I don't know what the income levels of the Asian families are in QO, but there are certainly sections of QO that are more expensive than most of the Wootton cluster - Kentlands and Lakelands.
In some high schools, especially Wootton, it is very normal and extremely common to prep for the SATs. This is why SAT scores is not an adequate way to evaluate the effectiveness/success of a school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I wish we have the scores by income level. As it is, the Asians and Whites do much poorly in QO and NW than Wootton. Is it because the Wootton kids are from a higher SES family?
For the most part, SES is tied to test scores, but some of that can be negated by prepping for the SATs. This is what many poorer Asian students do. I don't know what the income levels of the Asian families are in QO, but there are certainly sections of QO that are more expensive than most of the Wootton cluster - Kentlands and Lakelands.
In some high schools, especially Wootton, it is very normal and extremely common to prep for the SATs. This is why SAT scores is not an adequate way to evaluate the effectiveness/success of a school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I wish we have the scores by income level. As it is, the Asians and Whites do much poorly in QO and NW than Wootton. Is it because the Wootton kids are from a higher SES family?
For the most part, SES is tied to test scores, but some of that can be negated by prepping for the SATs. This is what many poorer Asian students do. I don't know what the income levels of the Asian families are in QO, but there are certainly sections of QO that are more expensive than most of the Wootton cluster - Kentlands and Lakelands.
Anonymous wrote:
I wish we have the scores by income level. As it is, the Asians and Whites do much poorly in QO and NW than Wootton. Is it because the Wootton kids are from a higher SES family?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^^so if you transfer your kid from Quince Orchard HS to Walt Whitman HS, their SAT scores will go up 200-300 points?
Teaching kids is nothing like turning light switches on and off. It takes time and effort. Don't be stupid.
Are you saying that the average Whitman SAT scores are higher because the teachers at Whitman are better?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Check out Clarksburg HS carefully before you buy there.
Which aspects of Clarksburg HS, specifically, merit careful checking-out, in your opinion?
school performance
What about it?
do your work then ask
NP here. Actually, you're the one that should do the work. Make sure you're able to back up your statements.
Clarksburg vs Wootton vs QO (check out top of page 2 scores)
http://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/regulatoryaccountability/glance/currentyear/schools/04249.pdf
http://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/regulatoryaccountability/glance/currentyear/schools/04234.pdf
http://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/regulatoryaccountability/glance/currentyear/schools/04125.pdf
Holy Sh*t. Clarksburg is no better than Gaithersburg High.
Anonymous wrote:OP
If you are interested in test scores, this report has very detailed information on SAT scores broken down by school (see page 8 onwards) and within each school broken down by race (see page 12)
http://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/info/pdf/160929%20SAT%20Exam%20Participation%20Perform.pdf
Some highlights from the school people here have mentioned. :
SAT mean scores
Northwest
Asian 1719
Black 1369
Hispanic 1469
White 1661
Wootton
Asian 1897
B 1526
H 1598
W 1809
Clarksburg
AS 1708
B 1401
H 1417
W 1607
Richard Montgomery (around 125 students are in the IB magnet)
AS 1941
B 1467
H 1547
W 1873
Quince Orchard
AS 1720
B 1346
H 1503
W 1687
Walt Whitman
AS 1901
B 1561
H 1827
W 1917
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^^so if you transfer your kid from Quince Orchard HS to Walt Whitman HS, their SAT scores will go up 200-300 points?
Teaching kids is nothing like turning light switches on and off. It takes time and effort. Don't be stupid.
Are you saying that the average Whitman SAT scores are higher because the teachers at Whitman are better?
They pay $200+/hr for SAT tutors