Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just did my first IUI which as of this weekend seems to be a success (definite positive hpt but I'm on vacation so I won't see my RE until next week). I have serious DOR, am in my mid-30s with an undetectable AMH, high FSH, and an AFC of 2-3. I'm genuinely shocked that this worked and have minimal expectations of a successful birth given my history of miscarriages. But mostly I'm just shocked that iui worked. We just tried this month while we wait for our IVF meds to arrive, though I'm also skeptical IVF will work given my low AFC. My RE said he wouldn't even genetically test any embryos since I'm only likely to get one or two out of any IVF round, so I figure the risk of miscarrying this one is the same as whatever risk I'd have of miscarrying with IVF.
Congrats!!! Did you do injectables or with clomid?
Also my RE said the same thing as you, but was your RE open to banking and then testing?
Anonymous wrote:Just did my first IUI which as of this weekend seems to be a success (definite positive hpt but I'm on vacation so I won't see my RE until next week). I have serious DOR, am in my mid-30s with an undetectable AMH, high FSH, and an AFC of 2-3. I'm genuinely shocked that this worked and have minimal expectations of a successful birth given my history of miscarriages. But mostly I'm just shocked that iui worked. We just tried this month while we wait for our IVF meds to arrive, though I'm also skeptical IVF will work given my low AFC. My RE said he wouldn't even genetically test any embryos since I'm only likely to get one or two out of any IVF round, so I figure the risk of miscarrying this one is the same as whatever risk I'd have of miscarrying with IVF.
Anonymous wrote:21:18 hope its ok to ask how old were you when you delivered and did you ever try for #2? Thanks!
Anonymous wrote:New poster here. So with IUIs they tend to have you do OPKs at home? PP that gives me hope that at 44 you had success! When you were being monitored at 39, was it for IVF or IUI?
Anonymous wrote:At Shady Grove they monitor your cycle with transvaginal ultrasounds, so they can see how many mature follicles you have, when you will be ready to ovulate and how thick your lining is. Once your follicles are mature enough, they instruct you to take a trigger shot that will make you ovulate within 36 hours so they can time the IUI correctly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know that IUI is hit or miss, but for those who were successful...which clinic did you use and who was the doctor? My husband and I considering it and I’m looking for good options.
I know the q is where were you successful but I think its equally imp. to know what to avoid with respect to IUIs. I did 3 IUIs with Shady Grove. The first two included just a baseline ultrasound and no further monitoring. I was instructed to track my ovulation using at-home opks and no trigger; they did not test blood to make sure I had ovulated. I am v. sure there was user error and am not at all confident the procedures were done on the correct day. If I knew then what I knew now there is no way I would have wasted time/money on that. Given that I was out of pocket, I also would not have wasted what amounted to the cost of a cycle of IVF on the 3 IUIs.
I agree, I think if you're going to do IUI it's definitely worth it to do blood work and u/s monitoring.
Can you ask for this? Shady Grove recommended natural cycle IUI for me.
I wouldn't bother with a natural/unmonitored IUI. There's too many moving parts that could go wrong. Do you trust yourself with your OPKs enough? OPKs are also not always 100% and it is possible to get a false LH surge. There's so many things that could go wrong. If you are going to move onto IUI you should at least be monitored and I'd try to push for a trigger at least so you know for sure that your timing isn't completely hosed. If there is no MFI, a natural IUI with only one follicle isnt going to change your odds much from natural conception either. Just trying to be realistic here.