Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm not familiar yet with PARCC scores, but it's striking to read that a 99% in the DCPS standardized test (PARCC) translates into 30% in the private school one (SSAT). Can other parents comment on this?
It doesn't translate that way, but also the tests do not align -- PARCC is testing a grade level, middle school SSAT is testing a range of grades (5-7). For high school, our DC did very little prep; never even took a full practice test. The SSAT scores were completely consistent with DC's top PARCC scores. DC got no rejections. Actually, DC did better on the SSAT than on the ELA part of the PARCC and thought the SSAT was easier than PARCC. There was nothing in the math part of the SSAT that DC had not learned in school, so the score there was pure test performance. There was no knowledge gap. I will add that in the interviews, ADs consistently had enthusiastic comments about their experiences with kids admitted from DCPS schools.
What school were you coming from? Kids at our JKLM bombed the ssat and isee. A large amount of the math was brand new to them. I know because I studied it with my child and it was all parents talked about. Our kids had never seen the concepts before.
What grade? The SSAT for middle school is the same test for 5th through 7th graders, so you would expect to see new stuff if you are a 5th grader, unless you are tracked to 7th grade math.
The 5th graders at our JKLM had never seen much the SSAT math before but it was the same for the ISEE. The kids all did badly, despite many having top PARCC scores.
I was the one who studied with my child and he/she had never seen a number of the concepts before (even for the ISEE which was normed to be a 4th/5th grade test).
None of us (parents) could figure out what went wrong in their math curriculum. These are smart kids, who have 4's in math and good if not great PARCC scores but who did horribly on the SSAT and ISEE without a signifiant amount of tutoring
and test prep. Many of the kids ended up taking the SSAT/ISEE 4 or 5 times to get their scores up!
It was eye opening and I'm still not sure why it happened. This is from one of the most popular JKLM schools.
SSAT is SO not hard. I've done quant sample with my 5th grade non-JKLM DCPS student who finished it without errors and 6 minutes to spare. You people are absurd.
Anonymous wrote:OP again.
Thanks to the last 10 or so kind posters.
You have all taken my post as it was intended: an FYI.
At our JKLM a very common conversation (since K almost) is "what are you guys doing for middle and high school". And most people reply, "we're not sure. Perhaps private, perhaps public".
I think many of us had (have) this vague thought that all options were reasonably obtainable if our kids were doing well in school, etc. Turns out it's not the case. C'est la vie.
If a "top" private is your goal, do what others have said: apply early in PK/K or perhaps apply first to a K-8 private and transfer from there (because they do have relationships
with the top privates and it's much easier to get into a big 3 than from DPCS). Applying directly to a "big 3" from DCPS is a numbers game and not a good one lately (in the experience of those from our school). Maybe it's different
from other schools. Who knows. I'm sure it varies by year, by school, as the wind shifts, etc.
In my own case, I hadn't spent more than 6 months thinking about any of this. I certainly didn't have a 3 year plan to apply to a K-8 and then on to a Big 3. Quite frankly, I'm (we're)
happy with DCPS options for middle and high. We dipped our toe into other options and at this point, they didn't work out. If I was in a situation where I had to move my kid from DCPS at middle
or high school (either based on the kid or the school) or had a life-long plan to send my kid to a top private I would have done well to "set up" my private options earlier.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm not familiar yet with PARCC scores, but it's striking to read that a 99% in the DCPS standardized test (PARCC) translates into 30% in the private school one (SSAT). Can other parents comment on this?
It doesn't translate that way, but also the tests do not align -- PARCC is testing a grade level, middle school SSAT is testing a range of grades (5-7). For high school, our DC did very little prep; never even took a full practice test. The SSAT scores were completely consistent with DC's top PARCC scores. DC got no rejections. Actually, DC did better on the SSAT than on the ELA part of the PARCC and thought the SSAT was easier than PARCC. There was nothing in the math part of the SSAT that DC had not learned in school, so the score there was pure test performance. There was no knowledge gap. I will add that in the interviews, ADs consistently had enthusiastic comments about their experiences with kids admitted from DCPS schools.
What school were you coming from? Kids at our JKLM bombed the ssat and isee. A large amount of the math was brand new to them. I know because I studied it with my child and it was all parents talked about. Our kids had never seen the concepts before.
What grade? The SSAT for middle school is the same test for 5th through 7th graders, so you would expect to see new stuff if you are a 5th grader, unless you are tracked to 7th grade math.
The 5th graders at our JKLM had never seen much the SSAT math before but it was the same for the ISEE. The kids all did badly, despite many having top PARCC scores.
I was the one who studied with my child and he/she had never seen a number of the concepts before (even for the ISEE which was normed to be a 4th/5th grade test).
None of us (parents) could figure out what went wrong in their math curriculum. These are smart kids, who have 4's in math and good if not great PARCC scores but who did horribly on the SSAT and ISEE without a signifiant amount of tutoring
and test prep. Many of the kids ended up taking the SSAT/ISEE 4 or 5 times to get their scores up!
It was eye opening and I'm still not sure why it happened. This is from one of the most popular JKLM schools.
Anonymous wrote:What about applying to privates from DCPS PreK4 programs? Should we stay in our preschool for another year and apply to private K from there, or should we go to DCPS for a year and then apply to private K? If we get into DCPS for PreK debating whether to send our son for a year.
Anonymous wrote:Many of the K-8 schools have really good outplacement, including Lowell. I think there is some advantage in the long run going to a K-8 and then a top private for HS as your children really earned the spot and will be ready when college application season arrives.
Anonymous wrote:OP again.
Thanks to the last 10 or so kind posters.
You have all taken my post as it was intended: an FYI.
At our JKLM a very common conversation (since K almost) is "what are you guys doing for middle and high school". And most people reply, "we're not sure. Perhaps private, perhaps public".
I think many of us had (have) this vague thought that all options were reasonably obtainable if our kids were doing well in school, etc. Turns out it's not the case. C'est la vie.
If a "top" private is your goal, do what others have said: apply early in PK/K or perhaps apply first to a K-8 private and transfer from there (because they do have relationships
with the top privates and it's much easier to get into a big 3 than from DPCS). Applying directly to a "big 3" from DCPS is a numbers game and not a good one lately (in the experience of those from our school). Maybe it's different
from other schools. Who knows. I'm sure it varies by year, by school, as the wind shifts, etc.
In my own case, I hadn't spent more than 6 months thinking about any of this. I certainly didn't have a 3 year plan to apply to a K-8 and then on to a Big 3. Quite frankly, I'm (we're)
happy with DCPS options for middle and high. We dipped our toe into other options and at this point, they didn't work out. If I was in a situation where I had to move my kid from DCPS at middle
or high school (either based on the kid or the school) or had a life-long plan to send my kid to a top private I would have done well to "set up" my private options earlier.
Anonymous wrote:OP again.
Thanks to the last 10 or so kind posters.
You have all taken my post as it was intended: an FYI.
At our JKLM a very common conversation (since K almost) is "what are you guys doing for middle and high school". And most people reply, "we're not sure. Perhaps private, perhaps public".
I think many of us had (have) this vague thought that all options were reasonably obtainable if our kids were doing well in school, etc. Turns out it's not the case. C'est la vie.
If a "top" private is your goal, do what others have said: apply early in PK/K or perhaps apply first to a K-8 private and transfer from there (because they do have relationships
with the top privates and it's much easier to get into a big 3 than from DPCS). Applying directly to a "big 3" from DCPS is a numbers game and not a good one lately (in the experience of those from our school). Maybe it's different
from other schools. Who knows. I'm sure it varies by year, by school, as the wind shifts, etc.
In my own case, I hadn't spent more than 6 months thinking about any of this. I certainly didn't have a 3 year plan to apply to a K-8 and then on to a Big 3. Quite frankly, I'm (we're)
happy with DCPS options for middle and high. We dipped our toe into other options and at this point, they didn't work out. If I was in a situation where I had to move my kid from DCPS at middle
or high school (either based on the kid or the school) or had a life-long plan to send my kid to a top private I would have done well to "set up" my private options earlier.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So "win in the lottery or go private" isn't a real thing? Shocking.
You can make it work if you are willing to go to a 'lesser' K-8 or middle, and then apply to your Big 3 school in high school. Then you have the advantage of the outplacement office of the K-8 pushing for your child.
I am a different poster, but was making the same point in another post. Agreed!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So "win in the lottery or go private" isn't a real thing? Shocking.
You can make it work if you are willing to go to a 'lesser' K-8 or middle, and then apply to your Big 3 school in high school. Then you have the advantage of the outplacement office of the K-8 pushing for your child.
Anonymous wrote:So "win in the lottery or go private" isn't a real thing? Shocking.