Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think this would be very difficult, if not impossible to orchestrate. States such as VA don't allow pubic employees to collectively strike. It's against the law.
And also, in some areas of the US people who have the power, the votes and the voices don’t use public school at all, they use private school, they homeschool... so this would not have a nationwide universal effect...
I think it would. If all the nation's public schools were shut down for several weeks or months, the economy would crash. People wouldn't be able to go to work. It is about time for teachers to do what no one else is brave enough or willing enough to do.
I would fully support teachers and/or students going on strike. Something has to be done.
Not every parent would support that. I’m a teacher of elementary students and I’m not “going on strike”.
Anonymous wrote:Virginia teachers can’t legally walk out nor strike in any way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think this would be very difficult, if not impossible to orchestrate. States such as VA don't allow pubic employees to collectively strike. It's against the law.
And also, in some areas of the US people who have the power, the votes and the voices don’t use public school at all, they use private school, they homeschool... so this would not have a nationwide universal effect...
I think it would. If all the nation's public schools were shut down for several weeks or months, the economy would crash. People wouldn't be able to go to work. It is about time for teachers to do what no one else is brave enough or willing enough to do.
I would fully support teachers and/or students going on strike. Something has to be done.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think this would be very difficult, if not impossible to orchestrate. States such as VA don't allow pubic employees to collectively strike. It's against the law.
And also, in some areas of the US people who have the power, the votes and the voices don’t use public school at all, they use private school, they homeschool... so this would not have a nationwide universal effect...
I think it would. If all the nation's public schools were shut down for several weeks or months, the economy would crash. People wouldn't be able to go to work. It is about time for teachers to do what no one else is brave enough or willing enough to do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Women's March organizers announced a nationwide school walkout on March 14 at 10 a.m. (local). They're operating under #Enough. I don't know if Facebook pages can be linked here, but will try: https://www.facebook.com/events/1767175080245694/
Please not this group again. Enough with the vaginas - it's become a laughingstock.
You are sure bothered by those vaginas. Seems like they were pretty effective if you’re still triggered by them today.
VAGINA!
DP. No, the women's marches made women look silly and weak. They served no purpose but to trash up the mall. Women need to be serious to be taken seriously.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think this would be very difficult, if not impossible to orchestrate. States such as VA don't allow pubic employees to collectively strike. It's against the law.
And also, in some areas of the US people who have the power, the votes and the voices don’t use public school at all, they use private school, they homeschool... so this would not have a nationwide universal effect...
Anonymous wrote:I think this would be very difficult, if not impossible to orchestrate. States such as VA don't allow pubic employees to collectively strike. It's against the law.
Anonymous wrote:Most teachers would not go along with this. Perhaps I'm jaded, but public school teachers who really care are few and far between. They would only do it if:
1) they continued to get paid during the strike or back pay once it's over,
2) they are guaranteed to get their jobs back after the strike.
In other words, only if it benefits them personally.
Anonymous wrote:I think most parents would support it, especially if they had appropriate notice so could make other arrangements.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
DP. No, the women's marches made women look silly and weak. They served no purpose but to trash up the mall. Women need to be serious to be taken seriously.
Your opinion of large groups of women (and men) in hand-knit bright-pink hats is really irrelevant to this thread and this topic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
DP. No, the women's marches made women look silly and weak. They served no purpose but to trash up the mall. Women need to be serious to be taken seriously.
Your opinion of large groups of women (and men) in hand-knit bright-pink hats is really irrelevant to this thread and this topic.
No, if you had read, on p. 3 a poster recommends aligning with Women's March to march on Washington on this issue. Our point is that group doesn't have credibility. go back and read above.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
DP. No, the women's marches made women look silly and weak. They served no purpose but to trash up the mall. Women need to be serious to be taken seriously.
Your opinion of large groups of women (and men) in hand-knit bright-pink hats is really irrelevant to this thread and this topic.