Maybe we should move this discussion to Explicit. Everyone has to log in other there.Anonymous wrote:TomSietsema wrote:Ha! That was a mistake there. i meant to log in as myself, but come on, it was obvious, right?
I'm curious why so few people log in as themselves. Honestly, the site loses credibility when people don't identify themselves. Real names = credibility (and responsibility).
Take one look at the political forum and you'll understand why.![]()
TomSietsema wrote:I liked Le Diplomate very much at one point, but that's not to say my opinion can't change. I haven't been since my last review -- too many new restaurants to check out, and old restaurants to monitor -- and I'll be curious to see what I find. In the past, I've been impressed how a restaurant that seats almost 300 at full tilt cooks so much food at such a high level. (I've been at least a dozen times since it opened.)
UhAnonymous wrote:Jaleo, le diplomate, roses luxury, arroz, and rasika. All on repeat.
TomSietsema wrote:Hey, falafel fan, you do know I get hundreds of submission to my chat and I'm reading most of them in real time and adding links to stories and .... I can't address EVERY SINGLE COMMENT. (i was warned not to weigh in here, and I can see why.)
TomSietsema wrote:Ha! That was a mistake there. i meant to log in as myself, but come on, it was obvious, right?
I'm curious why so few people log in as themselves. Honestly, the site loses credibility when people don't identify themselves. Real names = credibility (and responsibility).
Anonymous wrote:TomSietsema wrote: Actually, I address a mix of reader questions and comments in my weekly chat -- including from readers who don't agree with me. I think it's only fair. If you follow me with any regularity, you'll see that although there are a lot of "Where should I go for my 30th birthday?" type questions, i intersperse those with travel, etiquette and other dining advice.
The incident regarding Commissary was a long time ago. You seem stuck on it for some reason. Why the curiosity? I briefly dated someone who had a stake in it, we ended the brief relationship amicably, but another party chose to turn the issue into something it was not. We all make mistakes. I apologized. Life goes on!
You ignored my comment about how Amsterdam falafel sucks. You have no idea what good falafel should taste like. Try Falafel Inc or Fava Pot in the burns for the Egyptian version.
TomSietsema wrote: Actually, I address a mix of reader questions and comments in my weekly chat -- including from readers who don't agree with me. I think it's only fair. If you follow me with any regularity, you'll see that although there are a lot of "Where should I go for my 30th birthday?" type questions, i intersperse those with travel, etiquette and other dining advice.
The incident regarding Commissary was a long time ago. You seem stuck on it for some reason. Why the curiosity? I briefly dated someone who had a stake in it, we ended the brief relationship amicably, but another party chose to turn the issue into something it was not. We all make mistakes. I apologized. Life goes on!
Anonymous wrote:I think part of it is that Tom's writing style is a bit repetitive. I'm sure it's hard to come up with new ways to write about food, but he could afford to use some new words and phrases or to vary his tone.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why does he recommend the same two restaurants every week? Surely everyone has heard of Jaleo and Rashika by now.
Jaleo is great, but please don't tell me he's recommended it in the last 5 five years.
There's an explosion of Spanish cuisine in town, Estadio is probably my favorite...yours?
Any chance he can, he will recommend Jaleo or another Jose Andres restaurant. I wish he would just acknowledge his bias.