Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a coffee chat with Joe Weedon this Friday from 8-9:30 AM at Compass Coffee on 7th Street to discuss the future of Shaw MS. Here is a link I received today:
https://www.joeweedon.com/cup_of_joe_oct_12?platform=hootsuite
Wow, I guess that is Ward 6.
That location is so central; it really does make sense for it to be a citywide school.
Shaw is in Ward 1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a coffee chat with Joe Weedon this Friday from 8-9:30 AM at Compass Coffee on 7th Street to discuss the future of Shaw MS. Here is a link I received today:
https://www.joeweedon.com/cup_of_joe_oct_12?platform=hootsuite
Wow, I guess that is Ward 6.
That location is so central; it really does make sense for it to be a citywide school.
Anonymous wrote:There is a coffee chat with Joe Weedon this Friday from 8-9:30 AM at Compass Coffee on 7th Street to discuss the future of Shaw MS. Here is a link I received today:
https://www.joeweedon.com/cup_of_joe_oct_12?platform=hootsuite
Anonymous wrote:Would be good for Banneker to move to the Shaw site. More accessible - room for growth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First work with the kids who are there. < 10% at grade level is unacceptable for any cohort.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But the population of kids will change as the feeders change. I agree that a change can be made. I also agree that DCPS needs to give a longer leadership contract in order to attract someone talented who will commit for multiple years. It is simply ridiculous that DC is creating these beautiful school buildings and nobody will go near them and in fact prefer crappy charter facilities.
This. Attracting the truly high-income kids is a later stage. First, more middle-income kids who are closer to grade level. It's a gradual process.
Correct. Who is going to give a school with those stats even a passing glance? Not me, for one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I guess I'm just wondering why Francis-Stevens is fine but Cardozo with the same feeders plus Cleveland, Garrison, and Seaton would not be.
Is it that people like the Francis-Stevens building or location better?
A fear of having HS students in the same building?
Not wanting the Cleveland, Garrison, and Seaton kids?
It can't be the lack of a middle school principal because F-S doesn't have that either. It probably shouldn't be the teaching staff since those turn over so quickly.
It is because Cardozo middle and high are low-performing. A lot more principal-ing work will be needed to turn them around. It is just too much of a job for any one person.
Also, Cardozo Middle has had a new AP almost every year. No leadership continuity. Without the title of Principal, APs tend to get promoted or leave for whatever reason.
It's not just academic performance but the indicators for school safety and satisfaction are very poor at Cardozo. Compared to FS, there are more suspensions, absences, and student turn-over (take a look at the most recent Equity reports). I also think that having a smaller middle school with a smaller pool of high-achieving feeder elementary schools like FS, Ross, and Thomson, will allow FS to be a high-quality desirable MS faster than Shaw MS or Cardozo. The fact is there are more struggling kids at Garrison and Cleveland.
Anonymous wrote:First work with the kids who are there. < 10% at grade level is unacceptable for any cohort.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But the population of kids will change as the feeders change. I agree that a change can be made. I also agree that DCPS needs to give a longer leadership contract in order to attract someone talented who will commit for multiple years. It is simply ridiculous that DC is creating these beautiful school buildings and nobody will go near them and in fact prefer crappy charter facilities.
This. Attracting the truly high-income kids is a later stage. First, more middle-income kids who are closer to grade level. It's a gradual process.