Why was her last name Fricker if her father was still involve with her. He's in some creepy youtube videos she did under a different name, but it comes up searching images and it's most definitely her when she was younger. She seemed to have a thing for making eery scary borderline horror movies. You can find the last name googling. The girls was from her first marriage.

Anyone know which private they attended?

I wouldn't be surprised if she did know or was involved in planning.

It's happened before.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The parents instincts about the boy were correct.

If their daughter had believed them, they would be alive.

Maybe she did believe him. The WaPo article said she broke up with him. Maybe he came to her window and threatened her with the gun.

I meant maybe she did believe THEM.

I was wondering about this, too. The mother's grown son had come home for the holidays and the father's parents had arrived for a visit. Seems strange that the girl would sneak her boyfriend into the house with extended family visiting like that. Plus, the boy had a gun. Why would he bring a gun with him to visit with his girlfriend?

Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry, but all 16 year olds need an "intervention", yet most parents realize its part of the learning process. Shame parents lost their lives over a moment of trying to do the right thing, yet few realize it wasn't the best approach.

There is something wrong with you that you keep repeating this nonsense. No one carea what you think is the best parenting approach.

Anonymous wrote:I hope the poor little boy gets his dog back. The rest of his family is gone.

This is heartbreaking! I just can't imagine how the survivors would move forward (that includes the girl, the older brother and the little kid).

And I hope the little piece of shit with the gun will get two life sentences without parole.

I hope the poor little boy gets his dog back. The rest of his family is gone.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The parents instincts about the boy were correct.

If their daughter had believed them, they would be alive.

Maybe she did believe him. The WaPo article said she broke up with him. Maybe he came to her window and threatened her with the gun.

I meant maybe she did believe THEM.

Anonymous wrote:The parents instincts about the boy were correct.

If their daughter had believed them, they would be alive.

Maybe she did believe him. The WaPo article said she broke up with him. Maybe he came to her window and threatened her with the gun.

I'm sorry, but all 16 year olds need an "intervention", yet most parents realize its part of the learning process. Shame parents lost their lives over a moment of trying to do the right thing, yet few realize it wasn't the best approach.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The parents instincts about the boy were correct.

If their daughter had believed them, they would be alive.

Yes, and the daughter may be dead. This was a situation that potentially had no way out if she was that involved with a nut.

Sorry my tense was off-the daughter could have ended up dead.

Anonymous wrote:The parents instincts about the boy were correct.

If their daughter had believed them, they would be alive.

Yes, and the daughter may be dead. This was a situation that potentially had no way out if she was that involved with a nut.

Anonymous wrote: If he was already sneaking in i might secure the house more, but this all came to light recently. They may have thought it was just a typical teenage romance until then.

I figured the daughter let him in, not that he snuck in on his own.

Anonymous wrote: And we MUST stop turning common sense behavior into "you're blaming the victim" mentality.

This x1,000

The parents instincts about the boy were correct.

If their daughter had believed them, they would be alive.