Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You don't let the kid "die in the gutter".
You take it away.
I wish. There are thousands of responsible, self-sufficient couples who would die for the chance to adopt a needy child. I wish we COULD remove children from irresponsible parents who can't take care of them. But unless the poor parents are outright abusive, we can't. Unfortunately.
This is...not true. There are thousands of kids in foster care available for adoption.
Everyone wants a healthy white infant. Not exposed to drugs in utero. No disabilities. Nobody want a disabled kid, or a crack baby or a meth baby or a screwed up minority 10 year old. And most kids who are fostered are nit healthynwhote babies. In fact, they are the kids who need CHIP.
Anonymous wrote:Hatch said today that the US didn't have money to pay for CHIP (but I guess it does have money for a $1.5T debt explosion for billionaires)
Anonymous wrote:That's funny because I'm tired of Orrin Hatch.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You don't let the kid "die in the gutter".
You take it away.
I wish. There are thousands of responsible, self-sufficient couples who would die for the chance to adopt a needy child. I wish we COULD remove children from irresponsible parents who can't take care of them. But unless the poor parents are outright abusive, we can't. Unfortunately.
This is...not true. There are thousands of kids in foster care available for adoption.
Anonymous wrote:I think Hatch has a point- why can't kids be in some kind of work-study program for health care? Not kindergarteners of course but slightly older, why not? Would give them better work ethic than their parents and break the cycle.
Anonymous wrote:Hatch was the Republican sponsor of the CHIP bill in 1997
''Children are being terribly hurt and perhaps scarred for the rest of their lives'' when they have no health insurance, Mr. Hatch said.
http://www.nytimes.com/1997/03/14/us/hatch-joins-kennedy-to-back-a-health-program.html
Guess when you're 83 years old you forget about things like that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They've been living there for DECADES.
Section 8 is for people making minimum wage, the working poor.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You don't let the kid "die in the gutter".
You take it away.
I wish. There are thousands of responsible, self-sufficient couples who would die for the chance to adopt a needy child. I wish we COULD remove children from irresponsible parents who can't take care of them. But unless the poor parents are outright abusive, we can't. Unfortunately.
This is...not true. There are thousands of kids in foster care available for adoption.
Anonymous wrote:They've been living there for DECADES.
Anonymous wrote:I think Hatch has a point- why can't kids be in some kind of work-study program for health care? Not kindergarteners of course but slightly older, why not? Would give them better work ethic than their parents and break the cycle.
Anonymous wrote:
I came to this country with virtually nothing and over the decades I worked multiple jobs during the first several years because I had a family to feed and clothe and provide housing. Not once did I think that the government was obligated to take care of my children because I was not able to make enough money. Over the years, I did well for myself and put three children through college - two through medical school and one did her MBA. They are all self-sufficient as are we (their parents).
There were years when our Sunday treat for lunch was eating at McDonalds because that was all that I could afford.
.