Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP is free to have whatever type of party she wants for her DD, though I suspect it's more for her than her DD. Whatever. That's their decision.
But, a) OP seems overly wrapped up in how fancy the party was, how exclusive, how much she spent, etc. I guarantee this spilled down to her DD and the party was flaunted in the excluded girl's face.
and b) it was absolutely bitchy to not invite the 4th girl. You had no obligation to, but that's not what we are talking about. Put yourself - or your daughter- in her shoes. These are kids that are her friends, they play together regularly, and she is fairly new and so probably desperate for a "tribe" of her own. She probably thought she had it. And it was likely a slap in the face to not only not be invited, but to realized that the people you thought were good friends don't feel the same about you.
It's wrong of the mom to publicly complain about it. But, you kind of could see this going down. You excluded her kid. You did. You had that right, but you did. I'd be pissed too, but I wouldn't publicly say so. I'd manage my DD's feelings and we'd move on. But, I'd think less of you going forward.
Sounds like the birthday girl has lots of friends. Surely more than 2 or 3 from soccer or whatever sport she's in and more than 2 or 3 from school So I'm sure other girls got "excluded." But the other parents weren't whiny. You can't invite everyone, the little girl's mom that complained about it is socially inept.
Anonymous wrote:If you can afford a $150 per head party, you can afford to add one more to the invite list.
Anonymous wrote:I think it may be a troll guys. Maybe a little hyperbole creating the mean girl mom indulging her daughter and not understanding that throwing the pre-teen par-tay of the century and excluding anyone considered a true friend may cause drama? The type of parent who spends that much on a kid's party isn't going to want to host hyped up, sugar drenched partying tweens all day and night without a lot of hired help. Maybe this is just the type of person who moves into the mini-mansions on small lots being built everywhere.
If this is real, the mom has a right to think it was tacky, but needs to let it go. You teach your kid to not sweat this stuff, but also to assume this is not a close friend. It's one thing if you want a nice venue and limit the amount, but if you can afford $150 per child then inclusion of at the very least friends is a nice way to go. Do as you please, but don't be surprised when a little girls feel are hurt and she distances herself from your princess.
Anonymous wrote:OP is free to have whatever type of party she wants for her DD, though I suspect it's more for her than her DD. Whatever. That's their decision.
But, a) OP seems overly wrapped up in how fancy the party was, how exclusive, how much she spent, etc. I guarantee this spilled down to her DD and the party was flaunted in the excluded girl's face.
and b) it was absolutely bitchy to not invite the 4th girl. You had no obligation to, but that's not what we are talking about. Put yourself - or your daughter- in her shoes. These are kids that are her friends, they play together regularly, and she is fairly new and so probably desperate for a "tribe" of her own. She probably thought she had it. And it was likely a slap in the face to not only not be invited, but to realized that the people you thought were good friends don't feel the same about you.
It's wrong of the mom to publicly complain about it. But, you kind of could see this going down. You excluded her kid. You did. You had that right, but you did. I'd be pissed too, but I wouldn't publicly say so. I'd manage my DD's feelings and we'd move on. But, I'd think less of you going forward.
Anonymous wrote:If you can afford a $150 per head party, you can afford to add one more to the invite list.
Anonymous wrote:How did you spend $150 per kid? I’m really curious! Did you take them to the theater or ballet? What could possibly cost so much??