Anonymous wrote:Yes, voting for trump at the very least means that white supremacy, misogyny, bullying of the disabled and sexual assault are not deal breakers for you.

Which makes you a sympathizer.

Sorry Not sorry if the truth hurts, honey.

And supporting a path to citizenship for illegal aliens makes you a criminal sympathizer. Though I'm sure that's a mantel SJWs like yourself wear proudly. Breaking the law is wrong - except when you guys do it, amirite?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because there are horrible places to live that make getting here legally nearly impossible and I have sympathy for people who flee for their lives with very little.

I've always wondered why we couldn't get many of these people some type of refugee status. And then some path to citizenship.

That would be the humane thing to do.

Is the US the refuge for all people in the world who live in horrible places? Should we let in any and all people who flee from their country in search of safety, a job, a better way of life?

Good question. We do have limited resources so obviously we can't help ALL. But we can't just close our doors and help none.

Cutting the number of legal refugees is pretty sh1tty, too. Thanks, DJT.

We DON’T close our doors and help none. Promoting this lie is not helping.

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/01/30/key-facts-about-refugees-to-the-u-s/

Trump IS reducing the number of refugees we save. You are promoting the lie.

How many other countries accept the number of refugees we have? DP, btw.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is kind of a straw man. I don't support illegal immigration. But it happens and we have to deal with it in a rational and proportional way. And if we want to get serious about it, go after the employers who hire people who are undocumented. Instead of making undocumented people out to be the boogeyman. Sorry. You aren't unemployed because some undocumented worker took your job.

This is how I feel about it too.

I met an undocumented family years ago. The parents came here to leave a desperate situation back home and have taken terrible jobs (including poultry industry) to try to make ends meet. The dad has been sent home a few times. Their lives are very precarious. Despite all of their troubles they are very kind and very hard working. I have a great amount of sympathy for them even though I don't think they should have come here illegally. But they were in a bad situation - not sure what I would have done differently myself if I were in their shoes.

The poultry factory where they work is terrible. They seem to be blatantly breaking the law and going unpunished. Plus the working conditions are terrible. Seems unjust that this family and others are being prosecuted but this company goes unscathed.

Agree with both PPs. A woman who used to care for a neighbor's daughter was here illegally and she fled her home country after her entire immediate family, including a younger brother, was killed by gang warfare. She came to the US as a 17 year old girl - no family at home and only a distant relative in the DC area. People like this woman are fleeing terror at home and while I don't think entering the country illegally is okay, now that she's here she should be treated humanely and with a path to citizenship. She is hardworking, two jobs (both menial but nevertheless she works them) and she has taught herself English.

Again: this woman, here illegally, should get to jump ahead of all the other immigrants who have waited patiently for years to LEGALLY become citizens? Why?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because there are horrible places to live that make getting here legally nearly impossible and I have sympathy for people who flee for their lives with very little.

I've always wondered why we couldn't get many of these people some type of refugee status. And then some path to citizenship.

That would be the humane thing to do.

So then, ahead of all those who have waited YEARS for citizenship? Wow.

Agree. And why should illegal aliens get citizenship at all? That's the problem with liberals. They are too willing to overlook illegal behavior. MAYBE legal residency (assuming they don't get so much as a DUI), but if they want citizenship, they need to go back and take their place in line.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because there are horrible places to live that make getting here legally nearly impossible and I have sympathy for people who flee for their lives with very little.

I've always wondered why we couldn't get many of these people some type of refugee status. And then some path to citizenship.

That would be the humane thing to do.

So then, ahead of all those who have waited YEARS for citizenship? Wow.

Anonymous wrote:To be fair, I think trump and un are both bsc. Basically interchangeable. Two insane people who should not have nuclear weapons.

Guess what? We had a choice. They don't. You idiots chose to put the bsc dotard in charge of us. So, frankly, we deserve whatever happens to us at this point. You wrote our death warrant.

But, sure, it doesn't matter who's president, right?

Sadly, agree.

To be fair, I think trump and un are both bsc. Basically interchangeable. Two insane people who should not have nuclear weapons.

Guess what? We had a choice. They don't. You idiots chose to put the bsc dotard in charge of us. So, frankly, we deserve whatever happens to us at this point. You wrote our death warrant.

But, sure, it doesn't matter who's president, right?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why? He calls another leader rocket man?

Ridiculous comparison. Are his own citizens calling him by demeaning names?

No. They aren't allowed. We are. At least for now. Until you all get your way. Killers of the first amendment.

From where I sit, it's the liberals trying to silence free speech. Say something they don't agree with, and they do everything to silence you - from ridicule to hate-filled verbal attacks to burning down buildings. Liberals LOVE free speech, as long as your speech agrees with them.

But you're right. NK citizens cannot criticize their leader (if they want to live). Why then do we have liberals saying they'd prefer him to our president, and comedians saying we should switch places?

Ahem. See Trump's rant against the NFL players who are taking advantage of the First Amendment to express their opinion.

Ahem. First amendment on their OWN time. They are there as paid (and extremely well paid) employees. Let them criticize their country on their own time.

They, unlike many workers, have a contract and a union. Take it up with those two things.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why? He calls another leader rocket man?

Ridiculous comparison. Are his own citizens calling him by demeaning names?

No. They aren't allowed. We are. At least for now. Until you all get your way. Killers of the first amendment.

From where I sit, it's the liberals trying to silence free speech. Say something they don't agree with, and they do everything to silence you - from ridicule to hate-filled verbal attacks to burning down buildings. Liberals LOVE free speech, as long as your speech agrees with them.

But you're right. NK citizens cannot criticize their leader (if they want to live). Why then do we have liberals saying they'd prefer him to our president, and comedians saying we should switch places?

Are you serious? They are comedians. Try to keep up.

That was half of my comment. What about the ordinary liberal idiots saying they'd rather have him as our president than Trump. For real?????

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why? He calls another leader rocket man?

Ridiculous comparison. Are his own citizens calling him by demeaning names?

No. They aren't allowed. We are. At least for now. Until you all get your way. Killers of the first amendment.

From where I sit, it's the liberals trying to silence free speech. Say something they don't agree with, and they do everything to silence you - from ridicule to hate-filled verbal attacks to burning down buildings. Liberals LOVE free speech, as long as your speech agrees with them.

But you're right. NK citizens cannot criticize their leader (if they want to live). Why then do we have liberals saying they'd prefer him to our president, and comedians saying we should switch places?

Are you serious? They are comedians. Try to keep up.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why? He calls another leader rocket man?

Ridiculous comparison. Are his own citizens calling him by demeaning names?

No. They aren't allowed. We are. At least for now. Until you all get your way. Killers of the first amendment.

From where I sit, it's the liberals trying to silence free speech. Say something they don't agree with, and they do everything to silence you - from ridicule to hate-filled verbal attacks to burning down buildings. Liberals LOVE free speech, as long as your speech agrees with them.

But you're right. NK citizens cannot criticize their leader (if they want to live). Why then do we have liberals saying they'd prefer him to our president, and comedians saying we should switch places?

Ahem. See Trump's rant against the NFL players who are taking advantage of the First Amendment to express their opinion.

Ahem. First amendment on their OWN time. They are there as paid (and extremely well paid) employees. Let them criticize their country on their own time.

Liberals have everything ass-backward:

- The illegal immigrants be called by the more respectful "undocumented workers" label and be protected in Sanctuary Cities, while law-abiding citizens exercising their right to vote are called every nasty name in the book and threatened with their livelihoods.

- Lawless thugs burning down property are given "space to destroy" by the liberal mayor, while hard-working shop owners watch their businesses go up in flames.

- A young man tries to grab a gun from a cop in an effort to kill him, and the liberals defend the thug with lies and force the law-abiding cop into hiding for fear of his life.

- Liberals become enraged if there is any hint of criticism of a welfare recipient with five kids acting entitled to public support, while mocking hard working lower-income folks, making do on what they earn, as uneducated, stupid rednecks from West Virginia.

- Liberals go bat-shit crazy if someone complains about all these bilingual signs and says illegal immigrants need to learn English, yet when a legal immigrant makes some errors in grammar, they ridicule her.

- Liberals demonstrate more hatred and acrimony for their fellow citizens (who wouldn't vote for Hillary) than they do a murdering dictator who is threatening our country.

I could go on, but you get the message.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why? He calls another leader rocket man?

Ridiculous comparison. Are his own citizens calling him by demeaning names?

No. They aren't allowed. We are. At least for now. Until you all get your way. Killers of the first amendment.

From where I sit, it's the liberals trying to silence free speech. Say something they don't agree with, and they do everything to silence you - from ridicule to hate-filled verbal attacks to burning down buildings. Liberals LOVE free speech, as long as your speech agrees with them.

But you're right. NK citizens cannot criticize their leader (if they want to live). Why then do we have liberals saying they'd prefer him to our president, and comedians saying we should switch places?

Ahem. See Trump's rant against the NFL players who are taking advantage of the First Amendment to express their opinion.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why? He calls another leader rocket man?

Ridiculous comparison. Are his own citizens calling him by demeaning names?

No. They aren't allowed. We are. At least for now. Until you all get your way. Killers of the first amendment.

From where I sit, it's the liberals trying to silence free speech. Say something they don't agree with, and they do everything to silence you - from ridicule to hate-filled verbal attacks to burning down buildings. Liberals LOVE free speech, as long as your speech agrees with them.

But you're right. NK citizens cannot criticize their leader (if they want to live). Why then do we have liberals saying they'd prefer him to our president, and comedians saying we should switch places?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why? He calls another leader rocket man?

Ridiculous comparison. Are his own citizens calling him by demeaning names?

No. They aren't allowed. We are. At least for now. Until you all get your way. Killers of the first amendment.