Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Many of the listed items are either wastes of time (e.g. butter) or enjoyable consumption goods that anyone would purchase more of if richer (e.g. travel), so the advice given seems to amount to "spend more money!"
Which is fine, but perhaps underscores what is confusing about the question; the difference between the rich and the affluent is merely the amount of goods purchased.
But see manners aren't a waste of time. If op wants to fit in, manners are one of those subtle "free" signals of wealth and status.
Anonymous wrote: Grew up upper middle class and I was taught that you're supposed to put a pat of butter on your plate and then take that butter to butter your bread - because you don't want to get bread crumbs on the stick of butter.
My understanding is that's a southern thing, and where I come from you have to be invited to attend.Anonymous wrote:I just had to google "Cotillion". Guess that pretty much means I grew up poor and probably still am
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just had to google "Cotillion". Guess that pretty much means I grew up poor and probably still am
Don't worry, I also had to google it, and I am English landed gentry. Maybe this is a very specific to DC thing?
Anonymous wrote:I think a lot of people are confusing UMC with "old money."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I find the butter discussion fascinating! I had no idea that you are not supposed to butter your whole piece of bread
Really? You are either young (under 35) or not raised UMC.
I'm am 45 and raised UMC and never heard about the butter thing. My parents and I also don't have a stick up my butt so.....
Do what you want with your butter! YOLO.
Having good manners means a person is uptight?
Uptight = Spending any length of time thinking about how anyone butters their bread
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just had to google "Cotillion". Guess that pretty much means I grew up poor and probably still am
Don't worry, I also had to google it, and I am English landed gentry. Maybe this is a very specific to DC thing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I find the butter discussion fascinating! I had no idea that you are not supposed to butter your whole piece of bread
Really? You are either young (under 35) or not raised UMC.
I'm am 45 and raised UMC and never heard about the butter thing. My parents and I also don't have a stick up my butt so.....
Do what you want with your butter! YOLO.
Having good manners means a person is uptight?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tons of UMC don't care about the butter. I feel like you people don't know what UMC means.
UMC means in the top 33% and well educated.
Yes, and that includes lots of people who don't care about the butter.
Anonymous wrote:I think a lot of people are confusing UMC with "old money."
Anonymous wrote:I just had to google "Cotillion". Guess that pretty much means I grew up poor and probably still am
Anonymous wrote:This a useful, fascinating, and somewhat depressing thread. I totally identify with the OP; we were small-town middle class and now have a gross income that puts us in the 1%-ish demographic. I feel like my entire life since college has been spent trying to crack the code of all the things that I didn't know that everyone else did. It's even more extreme for my husband, whose family lost everything in a revolution before they fled here. He looked in amazement at our kids when they were ordering in a restaurant one day and said "I didn't know how to do that until I was in my 20s." His family never had the money to go out to dinner.
Here's the thing though - we don't try that hard to make our kids fit into some social standard of UMC. We want them to be smart, kind, well-behaved, interested in the world, and have a powerful moral compass. Beyond that, well, if they want to learn to ski, great, but it's not a priority.
Maybe we're just lazy, but part of being a once penniless, clueless immigrant helped give my husband incredible disdain for peer pressure. He literally could care less if other people don't think he's good enough because he can't ski; he knows he is because he knows what it took to get where he is. I don't have that inner confidence at all. One of our kids takes after him in that department and I really wish that both did.