I prefer to sleep with a guy who knows Melissa has two s's and only one l and that Rosie O'Donnell has two l's at the end of her last name.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My first wife was a size 16/18, about 5'7". I think she was probably about 180ish or so?
She was thick, but she was sexy, too. Lots of curves, big hips, big breasts, just a big, voluptuous woman. She was always self conscious, but I thought she looked fantastic.
I'd much rather be with someone who looked like Kelly Clarkson or Queen Latifah and was confident and sexy, than some bony waif who constantly worried about not eating.
Guys like curves. (Well, REAL guys do. I have no idea what metrosexual douchebags like, as I don't understand them). Look at a sportscar. It's a collection of exaggerated curves. That should tell you something about how men see objects of desire.
Interesting. I'm 174 but a size 14 (and thanks for your post). How big is your current wife?
Ah..the no true sctotsman fallacy..all real men must like fat chicks.
Sorry, most don't prefer that. Curves doesn't mean fat. There are women in the gym who have curves because they work out and have deprived those curves. That's what a lot of men prefer. There are "chubby chasers" but that's not the norm. If it were you'd see modern fat actress, and you don't because no ines really wants to sleep with them. Guys prefer to look at Scarlet Johansson not Mellisa McCarthy or Rosie O'Donnel.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Men saying 4 should see the pictures showing how women of different weights and body types can fit into the exact same size 4 pants. They aren't loose elastic waist pants either.
totally agree with this. I'm pretty hippy, just because of my shape. But I've got a thigh gap and a small waist and a nice booty. So, if you judged me by my pants size, you might be missing out.
Guy here, not interested in a HIPPY woman. I would pass.
Anonymous wrote:I'm female and for me:
Size 8- never get hit on, DH has zero interest in sex
Size 4-6: occasionally hit on, DH moderate interest in sex
Size 2- hit on constantly, DH can't keep his hands off me.
I think you have to look at people's actions rather than what they say they want. There's a reason celebrities have low body fat, wear a lot of makeup, have certain hairstyles/clothing, and use photoshop- it's what the majority of people are attracted to.
And it goes both ways- a lot of women I know say they like dad bod, but 50 Shades and Magic Mike probably wouldn't have had as much success if the men in them had flabby stomachs and flat butts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My first wife was a size 16/18, about 5'7". I think she was probably about 180ish or so?
She was thick, but she was sexy, too. Lots of curves, big hips, big breasts, just a big, voluptuous woman. She was always self conscious, but I thought she looked fantastic.
I'd much rather be with someone who looked like Kelly Clarkson or Queen Latifah and was confident and sexy, than some bony waif who constantly worried about not eating.
Guys like curves. (Well, REAL guys do. I have no idea what metrosexual douchebags like, as I don't understand them). Look at a sportscar. It's a collection of exaggerated curves. That should tell you something about how men see objects of desire.
Interesting. I'm 174 but a size 14 (and thanks for your post). How big is your current wife?
Ah..the no true sctotsman fallacy..all real men must like fat chicks.
Sorry, most don't prefer that. Curves doesn't mean fat. There are women in the gym who have curves because they work out and have deprived those curves. That's what a lot of men prefer. There are "chubby chasers" but that's not the norm. If it were you'd see modern fat actress, and you don't because no ines really wants to sleep with them. Guys prefer to look at Scarlet Johansson not Mellisa McCarthy or Rosie O'Donnel.
Anonymous wrote:I recently had to confront this question. I met a woman on Tinder who really represented herself in the best light weight wise.
When she showed up, I realized she was 30lbs over what the photos indicated. I would say she was 5'5" and 165 lbs
I'm usually attracted to thin, very thin girls. But I had already committed my evening to this woman and I didn't want to be rude so I went with it. The fact that she was significantly younger than me probably helped.
Anyway, after several rounds of very strong drinks, we ended up at her place and WOW. At first I was worried if I would be able to get it up because I was so focused on how overweight she was. But she was so into sex it made the whole thing worth it 3x
Now I think I am into chubby
Anonymous wrote:I'm female and for me:
Size 8- never get hit on, DH has zero interest in sex
Size 4-6: occasionally hit on, DH moderate interest in sex
Size 2- hit on constantly, DH can't keep his hands off me.
I think you have to look at people's actions rather than what they say they want. There's a reason celebrities have low body fat, wear a lot of makeup, have certain hairstyles/clothing, and use photoshop- it's what the SOME people are attracted to.
And it goes both ways- a lot of women I know say they like dad bod, but 50 Shades and Magic Mike probably wouldn't have had as much success if the men in them had flabby stomachs and flat butts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This picture is ridiculously wrong.
From L-R: Size 0, size 6, size 10-12
+1 about the wrongness. As a buff guy, the woman on the right is by far the hottest. I'm not alone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My first wife was a size 16/18, about 5'7". I think she was probably about 180ish or so?
She was thick, but she was sexy, too. Lots of curves, big hips, big breasts, just a big, voluptuous woman. She was always self conscious, but I thought she looked fantastic.
I'd much rather be with someone who looked like Kelly Clarkson or Queen Latifah and was confident and sexy, than some bony waif who constantly worried about not eating.
Guys like curves. (Well, REAL guys do. I have no idea what metrosexual douchebags like, as I don't understand them). Look at a sportscar. It's a collection of exaggerated curves. That should tell you something about how men see objects of desire.
Interesting. I'm 174 but a size 14 (and thanks for your post). How big is your current wife?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Men saying 4 should see the pictures showing how women of different weights and body types can fit into the exact same size 4 pants. They aren't loose elastic waist pants either.
totally agree with this. I'm pretty hippy, just because of my shape. But I've got a thigh gap and a small waist and a nice booty. So, if you judged me by my pants size, you might be missing out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This picture is ridiculously wrong.
From L-R: Size 0, size 6, size 10-12
+1 about the wrongness. As a buff guy, the woman on the right is by far the hottest. I'm not alone.
I believe that was from a European newspaper where a US 12 is a 16. And a US 16 is sold as a car cover.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This picture is ridiculously wrong.
From L-R: Size 0, size 6, size 10-12
L-R size 2/4, size 6, size 14
Finally, someone gets it right
Agree and I think the size 14 looks like the one who would be the most fun!
+1
I'm built like the size 14 above but with blondish hair. Sure, I'd love to be a bit trimmer but my DH seems very happy with the way I am. If I lost weight in the wrong places he wouldn't be happy!