Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is why I wish APS would release the actual percentage/number of 5th graders applying to HB from each ES. My guess has always been that a higher proportion of ATS 5th graders may apply (compared to the proportion of 5th graders from the neighborhood ES). The ATS kids draw from all over the County and then are scattered to their home zones for middle school. The ATS kids are starting their friendships over, regardless of whether they go to HB or the home middle school. In contrast, many neighborhood ES kids may want to just stick with their existing friends through middle school and therefore not as many apply to HB--- I have heard this from quite a few parents in our neighborhood. This is just a theory... not sure why APS is so secretive about the HB admission pool data.
Maybe they aren't secretive. The form and the lottery are based on your home ES. The transfer report shows how many kids transfer in from which middle school zone (so you can figure out from which group of ES). It's not being "secret" -- they are reporting the information they easily have. What you are really asking is "why doesn't APS run a custom report to satisfy curious gossips?" I can answer that--they have better things to do with their time (and our tax dollars).
PP- you missed the point of my post and are being unnecessarily snarky. The transfer report shows how many kids transfer in from which middle school zone-- but it doesn't show which elementary school they attended before coming to HB. It also doesn't show how many kids apply from each ES (or from private school for that matter). This is information APS should easily have- X%/# of 5th graders from Taylor who apply; X%/# from Long Branch; X%/# from ATS, etc. If more ATS kids proportionally apply to the HB lottery, then it makes sense why it seems like a disproportionate amount are accepted (or maybe that's not even true). The data would also show (or not show) whether there are admissions irregularities that could be chalked up to connections/favoritism people often claim. Without this data, its hard to have a conversation about whether the lottery should change, which was a point of discussion when the APS transfer policy was being revised last year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is why I wish APS would release the actual percentage/number of 5th graders applying to HB from each ES. My guess has always been that a higher proportion of ATS 5th graders may apply (compared to the proportion of 5th graders from the neighborhood ES). The ATS kids draw from all over the County and then are scattered to their home zones for middle school. The ATS kids are starting their friendships over, regardless of whether they go to HB or the home middle school. In contrast, many neighborhood ES kids may want to just stick with their existing friends through middle school and therefore not as many apply to HB--- I have heard this from quite a few parents in our neighborhood. This is just a theory... not sure why APS is so secretive about the HB admission pool data.
Maybe they aren't secretive. The form and the lottery are based on your home ES. The transfer report shows how many kids transfer in from which middle school zone (so you can figure out from which group of ES). It's not being "secret" -- they are reporting the information they easily have. What you are really asking is "why doesn't APS run a custom report to satisfy curious gossips?" I can answer that--they have better things to do with their time (and our tax dollars).
Anonymous wrote:Do we know that there are, in fact, a disproportionate number of kids who go to H-B from ATS? Or is it just that people take more notice of them?
Anonymous wrote:This is why I wish APS would release the actual percentage/number of 5th graders applying to HB from each ES. My guess has always been that a higher proportion of ATS 5th graders may apply (compared to the proportion of 5th graders from the neighborhood ES). The ATS kids draw from all over the County and then are scattered to their home zones for middle school. The ATS kids are starting their friendships over, regardless of whether they go to HB or the home middle school. In contrast, many neighborhood ES kids may want to just stick with their existing friends through middle school and therefore not as many apply to HB--- I have heard this from quite a few parents in our neighborhood. This is just a theory... not sure why APS is so secretive about the HB admission pool data.
Anonymous wrote:This is why I wish APS would release the actual percentage/number of 5th graders applying to HB from each ES. My guess has always been that a higher proportion of ATS 5th graders may apply (compared to the proportion of 5th graders from the neighborhood ES). The ATS kids draw from all over the County and then are scattered to their home zones for middle school. The ATS kids are starting their friendships over, regardless of whether they go to HB or the home middle school. In contrast, many neighborhood ES kids may want to just stick with their existing friends through middle school and therefore not as many apply to HB--- I have heard this from quite a few parents in our neighborhood. This is just a theory... not sure why APS is so secretive about the HB admission pool data.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:HB is for the connected, and once you are in the HB ecosystem you realize how classist it is when the UMC whites in all AP classes don't associate with the very few minorities that are let in. The elitist ATS to HB route is steeped in conspiracy.
ATS to HB is such a joke. Those schools could not be more different, so if one is such a great fit for your child, the other probably isn't. For some people, though, all that matters is exclusivity.
I see people on this board say things like this a lot, and I'm sorry but it just betrays a lack of understanding of both schools, educational philosophies, and child development. The type of discipline that kids need in the early years is very different from what is needed later on in their educations. It's not a joke to decide that both schools have something positive to offer your child at different stages of his/her life.
Complain if you want that people shouldn't be able to win two different lotteries, but that's a different issue. Though, if you're going to be consistent in arguing that the schools are so different that an interest in both of them doesn't make sense, then you should probably also argue that you should be allowed to participate in only one of the lotteries. Whether your child gets in or not should be irrelevant, if your argument is only about the types of schools they are.
No. Just admit why you like those schools. You're not fooling anyone. It has NOTHING to do with child development or whether the particular school's philosophy is a good fit for a particular child or family. It's exclusivity and "prestige" test scores, with a side helping of a smaller setting (perhaps there is a correlation with the scores), and nothing more.
I have no issue with families applying to both lotteries. I just don't believe what you are selling.
Luckily for me, I don't have to get you to buy it. I can believe what I believe, and you can believe what you want. I'm just pointing out the BS of posters who claim that their objections to people going to both schools is about school philosophy. To paraphrase your words, it has NOTHING to do with school philosophies. Your objection is to people who get into both schools. It's bitterness with a side helping of envy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:HB is for the connected, and once you are in the HB ecosystem you realize how classist it is when the UMC whites in all AP classes don't associate with the very few minorities that are let in. The elitist ATS to HB route is steeped in conspiracy.
ATS to HB is such a joke. Those schools could not be more different, so if one is such a great fit for your child, the other probably isn't. For some people, though, all that matters is exclusivity.
I see people on this board say things like this a lot, and I'm sorry but it just betrays a lack of understanding of both schools, educational philosophies, and child development. The type of discipline that kids need in the early years is very different from what is needed later on in their educations. It's not a joke to decide that both schools have something positive to offer your child at different stages of his/her life.
Complain if you want that people shouldn't be able to win two different lotteries, but that's a different issue. Though, if you're going to be consistent in arguing that the schools are so different that an interest in both of them doesn't make sense, then you should probably also argue that you should be allowed to participate in only one of the lotteries. Whether your child gets in or not should be irrelevant, if your argument is only about the types of schools they are.
No. Just admit why you like those schools. You're not fooling anyone. It has NOTHING to do with child development or whether the particular school's philosophy is a good fit for a particular child or family. It's exclusivity and "prestige" test scores, with a side helping of a smaller setting (perhaps there is a correlation with the scores), and nothing more.
I have no issue with families applying to both lotteries. I just don't believe what you are selling.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:HB is for the connected, and once you are in the HB ecosystem you realize how classist it is when the UMC whites in all AP classes don't associate with the very few minorities that are let in. The elitist ATS to HB route is steeped in conspiracy.
ATS to HB is such a joke. Those schools could not be more different, so if one is such a great fit for your child, the other probably isn't. For some people, though, all that matters is exclusivity.
I see people on this board say things like this a lot, and I'm sorry but it just betrays a lack of understanding of both schools, educational philosophies, and child development. The type of discipline that kids need in the early years is very different from what is needed later on in their educations. It's not a joke to decide that both schools have something positive to offer your child at different stages of his/her life.
Complain if you want that people shouldn't be able to win two different lotteries, but that's a different issue. Though, if you're going to be consistent in arguing that the schools are so different that an interest in both of them doesn't make sense, then you should probably also argue that you should be allowed to participate in only one of the lotteries. Whether your child gets in or not should be irrelevant, if your argument is only about the types of schools they are.
No. Just admit why you like those schools. You're not fooling anyone. It has NOTHING to do with child development or whether the particular school's philosophy is a good fit for a particular child or family. It's exclusivity and "prestige" test scores, with a side helping of a smaller setting (perhaps there is a correlation with the scores), and nothing more.
I have no issue with families applying to both lotteries. I just don't believe what you are selling.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:HB is for the connected, and once you are in the HB ecosystem you realize how classist it is when the UMC whites in all AP classes don't associate with the very few minorities that are let in. The elitist ATS to HB route is steeped in conspiracy.
ATS to HB is such a joke. Those schools could not be more different, so if one is such a great fit for your child, the other probably isn't. For some people, though, all that matters is exclusivity.
I see people on this board say things like this a lot, and I'm sorry but it just betrays a lack of understanding of both schools, educational philosophies, and child development. The type of discipline that kids need in the early years is very different from what is needed later on in their educations. It's not a joke to decide that both schools have something positive to offer your child at different stages of his/her life.
Complain if you want that people shouldn't be able to win two different lotteries, but that's a different issue. Though, if you're going to be consistent in arguing that the schools are so different that an interest in both of them doesn't make sense, then you should probably also argue that you should be allowed to participate in only one of the lotteries. Whether your child gets in or not should be irrelevant, if your argument is only about the types of schools they are.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:HB is for the connected, and once you are in the HB ecosystem you realize how classist it is when the UMC whites in all AP classes don't associate with the very few minorities that are let in. The elitist ATS to HB route is steeped in conspiracy.
ATS to HB is such a joke. Those schools could not be more different, so if one is such a great fit for your child, the other probably isn't. For some people, though, all that matters is exclusivity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:HB is for the connected, and once you are in the HB ecosystem you realize how classist it is when the UMC whites in all AP classes don't associate with the very few minorities that are let in. The elitist ATS to HB route is steeped in conspiracy.
ATS to HB is such a joke. Those schools could not be more different, so if one is such a great fit for your child, the other probably isn't. For some people, though, all that matters is exclusivity.
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:HB is for the connected, and once you are in the HB ecosystem you realize how classist it is when the UMC whites in all AP classes don't associate with the very few minorities that are let in. The elitist ATS to HB route is steeped in conspiracy.
ATS to HB is such a joke. Those schools could not be more different, so if one is such a great fit for your child, the other probably isn't. For some people, though, all that matters is exclusivity.