Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am the poster who started writing about my issues with the Boy Scouts and their exclusion of atheists. I want to say a couple of things and then I'm going to exit this thread. First of all, I am under no illusion that the Boy Scouts and especially individual troops are, on the whole, malevolent. I think that they do a lot of good for a lot of boys. While some troops are, of course, better than others, I don't doubt that, in this area in particular, they do a lot of good. In fact, I think that the organization as a whole is just a couple of reforms from all ing their remaining major issues.
That said, the people suggesting that the discrimination against atheists is no big deal and that the BSA is acting like other religious organizations are missing the point. There is a BIG difference between promoting a specific belief system and excluding a specific belief system. It is the difference between, for example, the Mormons saying that only Mormons are welcome in our temple (perfectly normal) and saying that absolutely everyone except Jews are welcome in our temple, which is bigotry. As many people have pointed out, the BSA does not use its status as a private organization to promote any one single belief system. What people don't like to point out is that the BSA does use its status as a private organization to exclude, marginalize, and stigmatized one particular belief system.
I hope that they eventually do better.
I've appreciated hearing your perspective. I do think that it's all about how you frame it. Boy Scouts does promote a system of belief that acknowledges that some form of faith in a higher being guides your morals. Many of us that are religious (I'm a very liberal Catholic) find that IMPORTANT! The point of BSA is charter-building and just because you think that character is unrelated to God doesn't meant that I (or BSA) needs to agree with you. I can respect you, but I don't have to agree with you.
Do you feel the same way about Alcoholics Anonymous? Are they too bigoted, striving to marginalize you.
Anonymous wrote:I am the poster who started writing about my issues with the Boy Scouts and their exclusion of atheists. I want to say a couple of things and then I'm going to exit this thread. First of all, I am under no illusion that the Boy Scouts and especially individual troops are, on the whole, malevolent. I think that they do a lot of good for a lot of boys. While some troops are, of course, better than others, I don't doubt that, in this area in particular, they do a lot of good. In fact, I think that the organization as a whole is just a couple of reforms from all ing their remaining major issues.
That said, the people suggesting that the discrimination against atheists is no big deal and that the BSA is acting like other religious organizations are missing the point. There is a BIG difference between promoting a specific belief system and excluding a specific belief system. It is the difference between, for example, the Mormons saying that only Mormons are welcome in our temple (perfectly normal) and saying that absolutely everyone except Jews are welcome in our temple, which is bigotry. As many people have pointed out, the BSA does not use its status as a private organization to promote any one single belief system. What people don't like to point out is that the BSA does use its status as a private organization to exclude, marginalize, and stigmatized one particular belief system.
I hope that they eventually do better.
Anonymous wrote:Hypocrite of the year award ... I don't want him hanging around with kids that weren't raised to be sensitive to others but also don't want him hanging around with a bunch of dorks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The kids that I see that stick with scouts through school (to eagle scout) are all good kids with their head screwed on the right way. These are kids that are polite and have inclusive viewpoints.
The troops where I am are fairly liberal.
The issue scouts had in the past was equating gay with pedophile. The anti-gay aspect was nominally (and mistakenly) to protect the kids.
Hint: Joe Biden: former Boyscout
Donald Trump: Not a boy scout
Love this re Trump & Biden! You could add to the list of Boy Scouts, especially Eagle Scouts: Alexander Haig, John Glenn, the list of Senators, astronauts, judges, etc is mind bending.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Leaving aside the issue of whether OP is a troll, I am not going to let my son join the Boy Scouts. The activities are great but, fortunately, there are plenty of opportunities to engage in similar activities without the Boy Scouts (e.g. 4H). More importantly, while it is good that, after years of intense pressure, the Boy Scouts are finally in the process of addressing their overt discrimination against homosexuals, they continue to be a non-sectarian religious organization that discriminates against atheists and, ironically, has encouraged atheist scouts to lie about their beliefs in order to remain in the organization.
Nope. Not for my son.
Eh. We're atheists and DS loves scouts. It was recommended by his therapist for him to deal with social anxiety and it's definitely been helpful that way. I'm sure many would tell us we're horrid because we basically give DS the greenlight to mouth the religious stuff without believing it, but I grew up with rigid parents who denied me some fun memories because of their righteousness, and I'm not interested in telling him he can't do something benign that he really likes just because he has to say an oath that mentions a god he doesn't believe in.
My main beef has always been with their stance on gay scouts and scoutmasters, and they have improved on some of that recently, but luckily DS belongs to a very liberal troop (that probably includes quite a few atheists), and we also talk to him about the issue. And we don't give money to the national office.
I also wish they didn't have to wear the silly uniforms, but whatever.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is the issues with having any values. Someone without those values wants you to bend to their values.
The Boy Scouts is VERY upfront with its values. If they are not something that you can live by ... join another organization!
I agree with you on all counts.
1. Bigotry is, in fact, a value.
2. Not having that value, I would, in fact, prefer that the BSA bent to my values.
3. The Boy Scouts have, indeed, been VERY upfront about this and other values.
4. Since it's not a value that I can live with or want my child to learn, I will join another organization.
Look at that! Complete agreement!
Boy, it's REALLY a stretch to try to say that Boy Scouts' values are lacking. You aren't doing "atheists" any favors.
Is it really a stretch? This is an organization thst spent a century practicing overt homophobia. It is only now, slowly and against the wishes of much of its membership, trying to disengage from THAT bigotry. They may promote some fine values but let's not act like they aren't profoundly lacking in some respects. Even the BSA has (finally) acknowledged that fact.
Anonymous wrote:I was a scout but dropped out because I disagreed with the organization's values (read: discrimination). I would not let my kid join on principle. It has a racist and bigoted history. It also pushes religion, and I am not religious. It is basically a lite version of a Mormon youth group.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My good friend is a scout leader and has told me that if it's a scout troop in a smaller town, their ideals are smaller. Most troops around here are no longer as 'backwards' thinking as they were years ago. FWIW, he's an openly gay scout leader who wanted to be a leader because he greatly enjoy scouts when he was younger and went all the way through to Eagle Scout. He's in in the NOVA area and doesn't have any parents or scouts who have issues with his sexuality. His troop is also much less religious and more spiritual.
I think most troops meet at either a church or school. And from my experience with troops in this area, you don't have to worry about your son thinking he's more "manly" than you. They mostly stick to "camping" vs camping. My neighbor's son has yet to actually go camping because each time they have a trip scheduled, it rains and they cancel. They've mainly done backyard camp outs where a few parents crash on the host's couch and the other dads leave past a certain time. Their last outing for a badge was bowling, soooo, yeah.
I will suggest that is a very unlikely scenario for a boy scout troop (versus say a cub scout troop). To advance up the boy scout ranks there are certain requirements that must be met - a good many pertaining to outdoor and camping activities. By way of example -- to become a "first class scout" (a rank that usually is reached within the first couple of years of scouting) a kid needs to (among other things): Participate in 10 troop activities (not meetings) 6 of which must involve overnight camping. Five of those overnights must be in a tent, lean-to or igloo. The kid also needs to help plan a least 1 day's menu for a campout, and be responsible for cooking 2 of the meals (help from other scouts allowed). Other requirements include completing an orienteering course using a compass and discussing when to use lashings and particular knots - and then demonstrating how to use/tie them. Scout camp outs will include a lot of activities but will also be focused on helping kids complete requirements for rank advancement and to earn merit badges.
The troop my son is in does not camp in the backyard nor have they done any bowling badges. The projects they work on have substance to them.