Anonymous wrote:Was a great event this year. Kids had a terrific time and there was no drama. A lot of parents waited right outside the pavilion and could see everything. I hope they raised a lot of money!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm glad these girls are getting a head start on a lifetime of service through partying.
Philanthropy is somewhat different from service.
Philanthropy is somewhat different from party circuit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm glad these girls are getting a head start on a lifetime of service through partying.
Philanthropy is somewhat different from service.
Anonymous wrote:I'm glad these girls are getting a head start on a lifetime of service through partying.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am just wondering if the sponsors of this event understand the history of Glen Echo and the optics of calling this the "White Party"?????
Seems incredibly tone deaf.
Not everyone is as obsessed with skin color as you seem to be.
It is not a matter of obsession with skin color, it is understanding history and maybe some respect. It could easily be called the "Glen Echo Ball" or the "Suburban Catholic School Spring Frolic" or any one of another names, but sure, go ahead and be Squi.
And I guess the Beatles should change the album name.
Anonymous wrote:Who pays for this party?
Anonymous wrote:Who pays for this party?
Anonymous wrote:So, wait: 'The White Party' isn't slang for private school?
Anonymous wrote:Was a great event this year. Kids had a terrific time and there was no drama. A lot of parents waited right outside the pavilion and could see everything. I hope they raised a lot of money!!