Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Something I'm not sure has been mentioned...
Hayfield Secondary has no trailers; the school is in fine shape.
This means that my children are able to navigate between functioning classrooms with proper space, heat and air conditioning all day long. The benefits of learning in real classrooms instead of being stuck in trailers cannot be underestimated!
Sorry, but I'll take the good teacher and strong peer group in the occasional trailer over a GS 4 school with a focus on behavior management and barely meeting the graduation benchmarks every time.
Np-That's hardly the situation anywhere in FCPS. I've raised a bright, confident kid. They will bloom where planted. It's a shame you have such a volatile student. Maybe you should reexamine what's happening at home.
Nice effort to deflect, but still a fail. Maybe you should be honest next time about the low number of high-achievers at the GS 4 schools.
Why should I when my child and their friends are the high achievers? It's a shame you don't have more faith in your kid.
More of a shame you couldn't have done better for your kid.
Goodness! I'm not sure how they could be doing better? Summers in Europe. We're so well connected, they couldn't possibly take advantage of all the internships handed to them. It's been so lovely not stressing about being in the top 2 percent of their class. What a headache for all the strivers at the "top" schools. I feel so sorry for those kids. They killed themsleves for 4 years and can't even get into the state flagship school. Of course there is a thread all about that. All that pressure and nothing to show for it. Sad.
We can't relate. Our oldest breeezed into UVA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All else being equal schools have almost no influence on how smart your kid is.
That combined with the big fish small pond phenomena is lower GS schools in a slam dunk
Good luck paying for college overpaying for a house too lolz
The fish tend to shrink in the smaller ponds.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Something I'm not sure has been mentioned...
Hayfield Secondary has no trailers; the school is in fine shape.
This means that my children are able to navigate between functioning classrooms with proper space, heat and air conditioning all day long. The benefits of learning in real classrooms instead of being stuck in trailers cannot be underestimated!
Sorry, but I'll take the good teacher and strong peer group in the occasional trailer over a GS 4 school with a focus on behavior management and barely meeting the graduation benchmarks every time.
Np-That's hardly the situation anywhere in FCPS. I've raised a bright, confident kid. They will bloom where planted. It's a shame you have such a volatile student. Maybe you should reexamine what's happening at home.
Nice effort to deflect, but still a fail. Maybe you should be honest next time about the low number of high-achievers at the GS 4 schools.
Why should I when my child and their friends are the high achievers? It's a shame you don't have more faith in your kid.
More of a shame you couldn't have done better for your kid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I moved my family to a GS 8 school and absolutely crossed off all the GS 5 and lower schools. The decision wasn't completely rational and is the result of my own experience at bad schools. I came out of these cesspit schools with not even the option of AP/IB or a language other than French/Spanish but I could probably naturally survive a prison sentence if it came to that. My mind just can't accept that the lower rated schools around here are large enough to actually have decent programs where any motivated child can succeed.
OP here. I agree with the first part of this post. I went to a GS 4 with no AP's and have no desire to put my kid through that particular sort of ringer socially. On the second part of this post though, the lower rated schools do have a s*load of programs. Hayfield for example has a ton of AP's, offer multivariable calculus, Japanese and Arabic. You really do get a ton of resources just by virtue of being in FCPS.
It's great to have the options, but then you need to look at the actual results. If you compare Hayfield to Lake Braddock, the AP participation rate is about 8% lower, and the pass rate for the smaller percentage of students taking AP classes is 15% lower. Which school do you really think has the stronger peer group?
Anonymous wrote:I moved my family to a GS 8 school and absolutely crossed off all the GS 5 and lower schools. The decision wasn't completely rational and is the result of my own experience at bad schools. I came out of these cesspit schools with not even the option of AP/IB or a language other than French/Spanish but I could probably naturally survive a prison sentence if it came to that. My mind just can't accept that the lower rated schools around here are large enough to actually have decent programs where any motivated child can succeed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So you're pointing out that rich kids who have opportunity rammed down their throats from the day they are born have higher test scores?
I think it just shows that either good students don't always rise to the top or there aren't many good students at some schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the county continues its misguided effort to focus the bulk of FARMS/ESOL resources in a handful of schools, those schools will become defacto ghettos as higher-income families flee. That's what is happening now with the lower-performing schools. Boundaries need to be adjusted to bring in higher SES students. Also, offer challenging college-prep courses to make the schools attractive. Scrap the IB program except for 1 or 2 schools county-wide.
Then lobby the School Board to move part of Woodson to Annandale, part of West Springfield to Lee, and part of West Potomac to Mount Vernon, and to get rid of IB at each of Annandale, Lee and Mount Vernon. You can't blame people for wanting to avoid IB when it's a niche program that only appeals to a small percentage of students.
There is no reason to move any of West Springfield oer to Lee. It just makes zero sense.
West springfield has the most logical boundaries in all of Fairfax County. It does not have capacity problems and will actually be under capacity when renovations are complete.it is not the wealthiest zone by any stretch of imagination, just solidly middle/upper middle class. It has done an exceptional job educating all of its students, with some of the highest black and hispanic achievement in the county and state. It is not a large or oversized school like LB, Robinson or many of the other schools.
The only reason to rezone WSHS is to try to socially engineer things and to appease Lee parents. Moving a neighborhood from WSHS to Lee will do nothing to raise achievement at Lee. The only thing it would achieve would be to drive down property values i whatever neighborhood got rezoned to Lee.
If you look at attendance numbers and capacity from the Mt. Vernon area west toward Lake Braddock, I think it would be possible to consolidate and eliminate one school entirely. WSHS will be under capacity after renovation, Lee and Mt. Vernon are way under. I'm not sure about Edison, Hatfield, or Stuart. FCPS needs a comprehensive boundary study.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the county continues its misguided effort to focus the bulk of FARMS/ESOL resources in a handful of schools, those schools will become defacto ghettos as higher-income families flee. That's what is happening now with the lower-performing schools. Boundaries need to be adjusted to bring in higher SES students. Also, offer challenging college-prep courses to make the schools attractive. Scrap the IB program except for 1 or 2 schools county-wide.
Then lobby the School Board to move part of Woodson to Annandale, part of West Springfield to Lee, and part of West Potomac to Mount Vernon, and to get rid of IB at each of Annandale, Lee and Mount Vernon. You can't blame people for wanting to avoid IB when it's a niche program that only appeals to a small percentage of students.
There is no reason to move any of West Springfield oer to Lee. It just makes zero sense.
West springfield has the most logical boundaries in all of Fairfax County. It does not have capacity problems and will actually be under capacity when renovations are complete.it is not the wealthiest zone by any stretch of imagination, just solidly middle/upper middle class. It has done an exceptional job educating all of its students, with some of the highest black and hispanic achievement in the county and state. It is not a large or oversized school like LB, Robinson or many of the other schools.
The only reason to rezone WSHS is to try to socially engineer things and to appease Lee parents. Moving a neighborhood from WSHS to Lee will do nothing to raise achievement at Lee. The only thing it would achieve would be to drive down property values i whatever neighborhood got rezoned to Lee.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Something I'm not sure has been mentioned...
Hayfield Secondary has no trailers; the school is in fine shape.
This means that my children are able to navigate between functioning classrooms with proper space, heat and air conditioning all day long. The benefits of learning in real classrooms instead of being stuck in trailers cannot be underestimated!
Sorry, but I'll take the good teacher and strong peer group in the occasional trailer over a GS 4 school with a focus on behavior management and barely meeting the graduation benchmarks every time.
Np-That's hardly the situation anywhere in FCPS. I've raised a bright, confident kid. They will bloom where planted. It's a shame you have such a volatile student. Maybe you should reexamine what's happening at home.
Nice effort to deflect, but still a fail. Maybe you should be honest next time about the low number of high-achievers at the GS 4 schools.
Why should I when my child and their friends are the high achievers? It's a shame you don't have more faith in your kid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Something I'm not sure has been mentioned...
Hayfield Secondary has no trailers; the school is in fine shape.
This means that my children are able to navigate between functioning classrooms with proper space, heat and air conditioning all day long. The benefits of learning in real classrooms instead of being stuck in trailers cannot be underestimated!
Sorry, but I'll take the good teacher and strong peer group in the occasional trailer over a GS 4 school with a focus on behavior management and barely meeting the graduation benchmarks every time.
Np-That's hardly the situation anywhere in FCPS. I've raised a bright, confident kid. They will bloom where planted. It's a shame you have such a volatile student. Maybe you should reexamine what's happening at home.
Nice effort to deflect, but still a fail. Maybe you should be honest next time about the low number of high-achievers at the GS 4 schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Something I'm not sure has been mentioned...
Hayfield Secondary has no trailers; the school is in fine shape.
This means that my children are able to navigate between functioning classrooms with proper space, heat and air conditioning all day long. The benefits of learning in real classrooms instead of being stuck in trailers cannot be underestimated!
Sorry, but I'll take the good teacher and strong peer group in the occasional trailer over a GS 4 school with a focus on behavior management and barely meeting the graduation benchmarks every time.
Np-That's hardly the situation anywhere in FCPS. I've raised a bright, confident kid. They will bloom where planted. It's a shame you have such a volatile student. Maybe you should reexamine what's happening at home.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Something I'm not sure has been mentioned...
Hayfield Secondary has no trailers; the school is in fine shape.
This means that my children are able to navigate between functioning classrooms with proper space, heat and air conditioning all day long. The benefits of learning in real classrooms instead of being stuck in trailers cannot be underestimated!
Sorry, but I'll take the good teacher and strong peer group in the occasional trailer over a GS 4 school with a focus on behavior management and barely meeting the graduation benchmarks every time.
Anonymous wrote:Something I'm not sure has been mentioned...
Hayfield Secondary has no trailers; the school is in fine shape.
This means that my children are able to navigate between functioning classrooms with proper space, heat and air conditioning all day long. The benefits of learning in real classrooms instead of being stuck in trailers cannot be underestimated!
Anonymous wrote:All else being equal schools have almost no influence on how smart your kid is.
That combined with the big fish small pond phenomena is lower GS schools in a slam dunk
Good luck paying for college overpaying for a house too lolz