Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That explains BCC, but where is Whitman? My guess is this:
• Step 2: Identify high schools that performed at or better than the state average for their least advantaged students
Yep. This comes up every year. If you don't have any "least advantaged" students, or a statistically uncountable number, you lose out on a major metric. Which is fine. Whiteman families will just have to assume their school is fine.
![]()
I saw that too. LOL!
I am so tired of that stupid joke. I wish PP would come up with something new. I mean, seriously, how many time can you recycle same lame joke?
Not PP, but this is actually what the kids call it. The parents will come up with a new joke as soon as the kids do.
So I have heard of Whiteman, Wonton, Sherweed. --- What are some others?
Chen-tennial in hoco
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That explains BCC, but where is Whitman? My guess is this:
• Step 2: Identify high schools that performed at or better than the state average for their least advantaged students
Yep. This comes up every year. If you don't have any "least advantaged" students, or a statistically uncountable number, you lose out on a major metric. Which is fine. Whiteman families will just have to assume their school is fine.
![]()
I saw that too. LOL!
I am so tired of that stupid joke. I wish PP would come up with something new. I mean, seriously, how many time can you recycle same lame joke?
Not PP, but this is actually what the kids call it. The parents will come up with a new joke as soon as the kids do.
So I have heard of Whiteman, Wonton, Sherweed. --- What are some others?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That explains BCC, but where is Whitman? My guess is this:
• Step 2: Identify high schools that performed at or better than the state average for their least advantaged students
Yep. This comes up every year. If you don't have any "least advantaged" students, or a statistically uncountable number, you lose out on a major metric. Which is fine. Whiteman families will just have to assume their school is fine.
So Churchill and Wooton can make the list because do have "least advantaged" students? I wonder where they live.
Scotland area for Churchill. I don't know about Wootton.
I'm not sure, though, how Churchill can be considered in regards to low income students since the % of FARMS there is less than 5%. In Wootton, it's about 5.5%.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That explains BCC, but where is Whitman? My guess is this:
• Step 2: Identify high schools that performed at or better than the state average for their least advantaged students
Yep. This comes up every year. If you don't have any "least advantaged" students, or a statistically uncountable number, you lose out on a major metric. Which is fine. Whiteman families will just have to assume their school is fine.
![]()
I saw that too. LOL!
I am so tired of that stupid joke. I wish PP would come up with something new. I mean, seriously, how many time can you recycle same lame joke?
Not PP, but this is actually what the kids call it. The parents will come up with a new joke as soon as the kids do.
madmomxyz wrote:BS to Churchill and how they treat SN kids. They failed horresndously.
Anonymous wrote:That explains BCC, but where is Whitman? My guess is this:
• Step 2: Identify high schools that performed at or better than the state average for their least advantaged students