Anonymous wrote:I have been totally unimpressed with Maura. She can't state her position clearly and she doesn't seem to understand how the SB works. I really wanted to like her, but even when asked directly about 4th comprehensive, she hedged. She talks about diversity with no specific action plan.
Monique O'Grady is 150% for Choice schools. Very welll spoken, but clearly stated that Choice schoools are the answer, the "safety valve" (in her words) for Capacity.
Even if you don't like Lander personally, he has actually stood for some important decisions. He was the ONLY SB member to vote AGAINST renewing Murphy's contract! He voted for neighborhood school at Stratford and tried hard to push for the Wilson/HB site to co-locate with more students, such as Montessori or Pre-K. He has been open to listening and has changed his mind when the facts support a better decision. And he shut down the BS accusations by the HB people that moving them to Wilson was racist. He is a strong supporter of neighborhood schools and has said he is in favor of a 4th comprehensive in the mid-term plan. He says we need 1300 seats short-term PLUS a 4th comprehensive.
With who we have on the ballot, if you favor neighborhood schools and a 4th comprehensive, you should vote for James.
Anonymous wrote:So glad we saw this sh** storm coming and moved to McLean. Can anyone honestly say they are happy with any of these options?
Anonymous wrote:Anyone saying we need MORE choice schools is not making an informed and well-reasoned decision.
Anonymous wrote:Lander is a politician, but he's also been willing to do what it takes to get votes. Most of the other SB members don't care what the people want.
I'm not impressed with O'Grady and her love of choice schools. In fact, she's so out of touch that she is suggesting to the Westover voters that Reed can have neighborhood preference, but anyone watching the current policy changes knows that neighborhood preference is a thing of the past.
What's most important is someone to stand up to Nancy. She's on a huge power trip and she doesn't make good decisions. I've watched her in meetings claim to recap what Tania and Barbara say, but actually say the exact opposite. Tania is letting Nancy walk all over her right now, so I hope she develops a backbone. I'm not sure what to think of Barbara. Reid gets involved with the community more than anyone I've seen, but I'm not sure that it's much more than lip-service. Friends who have met with him says he takes the time to listen, but they don't get the impression he cares to actually make change. He's also a fan of choice schools.
I know who's getting my vote as I bide my time to try (again) to voite out Nancy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This just shouldn't be so complicated.
What shouldn't? Running a school district with a half-billion dollar budget?
That's bound to be complicated. The problem is not that people can't learn to deal with complications, it's that they don't choose to., but Setting definable goals for a project and comparing goals to what's achieved would be a huge help, but that would require people to occasionally admit that they made a bad choice. I think Arlington voters could accept that if it came with an explanation, but that's not the board way. Have an idea, implement the idea, stand by the idea.
cause 80% residents don't use APS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This just shouldn't be so complicated.
What shouldn't? Running a school district with a half-billion dollar budget?
That's bound to be complicated. The problem is not that people can't learn to deal with complications, it's that they don't choose to., but Setting definable goals for a project and comparing goals to what's achieved would be a huge help, but that would require people to occasionally admit that they made a bad choice. I think Arlington voters could accept that if it came with an explanation, but that's not the board way. Have an idea, implement the idea, stand by the idea.
cause 80% residents don't use APS.
I'm not talking about county residents. I'm talking about the school board members.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This just shouldn't be so complicated.
What shouldn't? Running a school district with a half-billion dollar budget?
That's bound to be complicated. The problem is not that people can't learn to deal with complications, it's that they don't choose to., but Setting definable goals for a project and comparing goals to what's achieved would be a huge help, but that would require people to occasionally admit that they made a bad choice. I think Arlington voters could accept that if it came with an explanation, but that's not the board way. Have an idea, implement the idea, stand by the idea.
cause 80% residents don't use APS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This just shouldn't be so complicated.
What shouldn't? Running a school district with a half-billion dollar budget?
That's bound to be complicated. The problem is not that people can't learn to deal with complications, it's that they don't choose to., but Setting definable goals for a project and comparing goals to what's achieved would be a huge help, but that would require people to occasionally admit that they made a bad choice. I think Arlington voters could accept that if it came with an explanation, but that's not the board way. Have an idea, implement the idea, stand by the idea.
Anonymous wrote:This just shouldn't be so complicated.