Anonymous wrote:I like the creative thinking this represents- but I don't think the east/west zones they are proposing are realistic.
What I heard at the work session is the reason for adding additional middle school and high school immersion options was the thought that kids were dropping out of immersion b/c they didn't want to go all the way to Gunston.
But now- they expect kids to go to Claremont for elementary- which is next door to Wakefield- but then trek all the way to Williamsburg for middle, and Yorktown for Highschool- when they live next to Wakefield?
By the last transfer report I could find- there were only 42 kids who transferred to Wakefield for Immersion, and 227 who transferred to Gunston. None of those transferred from Williamsburg, and 3 transferred from Swanson.
So I get why they might think that kids are being lost to immersion b/c they have to trek to Gunston.
However- I think this sets up most of the Claremont population to also drop out of immersion if they are told to go to Williamsburg.
If the concern is distance- they need to draw the zones North/South.
Anonymous wrote:I like the creative thinking this represents- but I don't think the east/west zones they are proposing are realistic.
What I heard at the work session is the reason for adding additional middle school and high school immersion options was the thought that kids were dropping out of immersion b/c they didn't want to go all the way to Gunston.
But now- they expect kids to go to Claremont for elementary- which is next door to Wakefield- but then trek all the way to Williamsburg for middle, and Yorktown for Highschool- when they live next to Wakefield?
By the last transfer report I could find- there were only 42 kids who transferred to Wakefield for Immersion, and 227 who transferred to Gunston. None of those transferred from Williamsburg, and 3 transferred from Swanson.
So I get why they might think that kids are being lost to immersion b/c they have to trek to Gunston.
However- I think this sets up most of the Claremont population to also drop out of immersion if they are told to go to Williamsburg.
If the concern is distance- they need to draw the zones North/South.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Williamsburg people are already upset about immersion moving there.
I am a "Williamsburg person". Really glad to see the new idea of East-West and hope they will redraw all boundaries to level out school capacity. Immersion in 2 middle schools seems great!
Thank you for saying this. It's nice to know there are folks in north Arlington who aren't immediately opposed to this concept.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Williamsburg people are already upset about immersion moving there.
I am a "Williamsburg person". Really glad to see the new idea of East-West and hope they will redraw all boundaries to level out school capacity. Immersion in 2 middle schools seems great!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If they move forward with this plan, they should keep Campbell as a county-wide options program and ditch ATS-- not the other way around. APS needs to open either the ATS property or the Reed property as a neighborhood school-- that's the only way to alleviate the overcrowding at McKinley. I like the plan overall though- it is at least creative.
Don't even bother with ATS. It's no closing. Find a different fight. That's a lost cause.
We can have both. They are very different schools.
--Campbell Parent
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If they move forward with this plan, they should keep Campbell as a county-wide options program and ditch ATS-- not the other way around. APS needs to open either the ATS property or the Reed property as a neighborhood school-- that's the only way to alleviate the overcrowding at McKinley. I like the plan overall though- it is at least creative.
Don't even bother with ATS. It's no closing. Find a different fight. That's a lost cause.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again, 2 choice schools in the McK boundaries while the school grows to 800 is pathetic.
No one is forcing you people to live in Westover. Move if you don't like it.
Really? You think that people should just up and move rather than insisting that problems be fixed?
Anonymous wrote:Yes. That could really overcrowd Swanson. Given the choice, won't every--or at least most-- families otherwise zoned to Kenmore try to opt into Swanson?
Anonymous wrote:Yes. That could really overcrowd Swanson. Given the choice, won't every--or at least most-- families otherwise zoned to Kenmore try to opt into Swanson?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But you can't be zoned to Kenmore as your neighborhood school but then have Stratford as your STEAM option. That would be two STEAM options.
So it DOES assume middle school boundary changes. Lots of them.
If Abingdon were staying in Kenmore, it wouldn't be in the "East" zone with Stratford as its STEAM school. Same with Barcroft--currently attends Kenmore, but it's in the East district map, so now Stratford would be its STEAM option.
Oh, yes, I see it now. Interesting. So, I guess what this does is guarantee you a spot at either Kenmore or Stratford STEAM, based on east-west boundary, and then you have the option of either Swanson or Jefferson if you want IB, Williamsburg or Gunston if you want Immersion, and then countywide options for Montessori and HBW. I sure hope a lot of people want IB and Immersion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again, 2 choice schools in the McK boundaries while the school grows to 800 is pathetic.
No one is forcing you people to live in Westover. Move if you don't like it.
Anonymous wrote:Again, 2 choice schools in the McK boundaries while the school grows to 800 is pathetic.