Anonymous wrote:Typo? Maybe. Probably.
But am shocked that someone would have the audacity to assume that median scores ran along gender lines (& that boys were higher). Good grief.

Race line? Is it part of what Metis was recommending? If it is so, the difference is minuscule.

And for those who want to know the HS clusters that feed into Barnsley ... WJ, RM, Rockville, and Wheaton.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cold Spring HGC has two classes with 50 students. Only Silver Spring's HGCs has more then two classes per school.

I think Lucy Barnsley HGC has three classes, can anyone verify?

Yes, Barnsley has 3 classes per grade (Barnsley is fed by 4 HS clusters)

Anonymous wrote:Cold Spring HGC has two classes with 50 students. Only Silver Spring's HGCs has more then two classes per school.

I think Lucy Barnsley HGC has three classes, can anyone verify?

Typo? Maybe. Probably.
But am shocked that someone would have the audacity to assume that median scores ran along gender lines (& that boys were higher). Good grief.

Anonymous wrote:It looks like we have both out of boundary and in boundary children who have received letters with the higher median test scores so there must be another reason for having two sets of median scores for the same program

Typo?

It looks like we have both out of boundary and in boundary children who have received letters with the higher median test scores so there must be another reason for having two sets of median scores for the same program

In boundary girl. TPMS medians stated:
Raven -- 27
SCAT -- 41
RC -- 22

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Takoma medians:

Raven - 26
SCAT - 40
Reading Comp - 22

Is this (above) for last year?
My letter says Takoma medians were:
Raven -- 27
SCAT -- 41
RC -- 22

My daughter's letter (2017) also has the first quoted medians: 26/40/22. Maybe they have different letters/medians for the in-boundary students? We are out of boundary.

Our letter had the second quoted medians 27/41/22, and we are in-boundary.

OP of the different TPMS stats. Yes, we are in boundary too. Strange that they did separate sets if avgs & interesting the in boundary was higher. Also, Hey, neighbor!

I'm happy to hear that MCPS published separate in boundary scores and they are higher to shut down the people on this board who think the in boundary kids are not competitive with the rest of the county.

No way it's in bound score, more likely boys v. Girls

Say what? Nice try, but no way. They don't take averages by gender. Must be in boundary. And, yes, it is refreshing to say that in boundary test scores are higher than out of boundary. So, we can just stick a cork in the old complaint about in boundary having it easier!

TKMS acceptance. Out of boundary boy. Median 27/41/22.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Takoma medians:

Raven - 26
SCAT - 40
Reading Comp - 22

Is this (above) for last year?
My letter says Takoma medians were:
Raven -- 27
SCAT -- 41
RC -- 22

My daughter's letter (2017) also has the first quoted medians: 26/40/22. Maybe they have different letters/medians for the in-boundary students? We are out of boundary.

Our letter had the second quoted medians 27/41/22, and we are in-boundary.

OP of the different TPMS stats. Yes, we are in boundary too. Strange that they did separate sets if avgs & interesting the in boundary was higher. Also, Hey, neighbor!

I'm happy to hear that MCPS published separate in boundary scores and they are higher to shut down the people on this board who think the in boundary kids are not competitive with the rest of the county.

No way it's in bound score, more likely boys v. Girls

My child is a boy in-boundary--so your theory doesn't work.

out-boundary boy here median score 27/41/22. PP makes sense.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Takoma medians:

Raven - 26
SCAT - 40
Reading Comp - 22

Is this (above) for last year?
My letter says Takoma medians were:
Raven -- 27
SCAT -- 41
RC -- 22

My daughter's letter (2017) also has the first quoted medians: 26/40/22. Maybe they have different letters/medians for the in-boundary students? We are out of boundary.

Our letter had the second quoted medians 27/41/22, and we are in-boundary.

OP of the different TPMS stats. Yes, we are in boundary too. Strange that they did separate sets if avgs & interesting the in boundary was higher. Also, Hey, neighbor!

I'm happy to hear that MCPS published separate in boundary scores and they are higher to shut down the people on this board who think the in boundary kids are not competitive with the rest of the county.

No way it's in bound score, more likely boys v. Girls

My child is a boy in-boundary--so your theory doesn't work.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Takoma medians:

Raven - 26
SCAT - 40
Reading Comp - 22

Is this (above) for last year?
My letter says Takoma medians were:
Raven -- 27
SCAT -- 41
RC -- 22

My daughter's letter (2017) also has the first quoted medians: 26/40/22. Maybe they have different letters/medians for the in-boundary students? We are out of boundary.

Our letter had the second quoted medians 27/41/22, and we are in-boundary.

OP of the different TPMS stats. Yes, we are in boundary too. Strange that they did separate sets if avgs & interesting the in boundary was higher. Also, Hey, neighbor!

I'm happy to hear that MCPS published separate in boundary scores and they are higher to shut down the people on this board who think the in boundary kids are not competitive with the rest of the county.

No way it's in bound score, more likely boys v. Girls

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Takoma medians:

Raven - 26
SCAT - 40
Reading Comp - 22

Is this (above) for last year?
My letter says Takoma medians were:
Raven -- 27
SCAT -- 41
RC -- 22

My daughter's letter (2017) also has the first quoted medians: 26/40/22. Maybe they have different letters/medians for the in-boundary students? We are out of boundary.

Our letter had the second quoted medians 27/41/22, and we are in-boundary.

OP of the different TPMS stats. Yes, we are in boundary too. Strange that they did separate sets if avgs & interesting the in boundary was higher. Also, Hey, neighbor!

I'm happy to hear that MCPS published separate in boundary scores and they are higher to shut down the people on this board who think the in boundary kids are not competitive with the rest of the county.

^^^^^^ Sorry for my bad typing!