Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The segregationists are always championing walkability, and strong communities.
They are never going to admit we could do a county wide system. They paid too much money for an almost all wealthy school.
I live within walking distance of W-L, and I'm happy my teens can walk to school.
That said, if APS went to a county-wide system tomorrow, I'd say, great! Arlington is definitely small enough, and my kids wouldn't spend any more time on a bus then I did when I was there age (in a rural area). And of course, there'd be at least a 33% chance they'd end up at W-L anyway. So, fine with me.
A county-wide system defeats one of the great advantages of public schools: going to school with kids in your neighborhood or at least 5-10 minutes away. No need to balance the three high schools -- let them each retain their own identity.
^^segregationist
Says a south Arlington parent who is just looking for a way to get their schools rated higher by shipping the problem kids to a different school that they weren't able to afford.
No, I'm the person who wrote "segregationist." (And I was joking.) I'm also the person whose teens walk to W-L.
I do think the "walkable neighborhood" argument is pretty much BS for high school. Again, my kids walk to W-L, it's a nice benefit. I don't think it outweighs other important county/school system concerns.
sorry, hit return to quickly. I meant to add--While I was joking that the PP was a segregationist, you might be. You are definitely a jerk.
W-L parent--disagree.,,walkability is huge for me. Keeps my kids from having to drive. They walk home after sports practices. Don't worry about bus schedules, etc.
My FFxco HS was a 30 minute car ride. My siblings and I had are fair share of dents and accidents to the family car. The school parking lot was also a nightmare.
I needed to go to W-L recently and walked over from Ballston. Lot of noisy kids yelling on the streets and one threw a football into the window of a house on Stafford. No thanks, plus that school is just a giant cluster-fuck in general these days.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Father of a current senior here. I believe Yorktown's central mission is to get as many kids into JMU as possible. If you are aiming higher and want a school that will help...consider IB at W&L or private.
Yorktown's 2016 SAT scores for white kids are about 70 points lower than at W-L, but then the scores for non-whites at W-L are poor.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The segregationists are always championing walkability, and strong communities.
They are never going to admit we could do a county wide system. They paid too much money for an almost all wealthy school.
I live within walking distance of W-L, and I'm happy my teens can walk to school.
That said, if APS went to a county-wide system tomorrow, I'd say, great! Arlington is definitely small enough, and my kids wouldn't spend any more time on a bus then I did when I was there age (in a rural area). And of course, there'd be at least a 33% chance they'd end up at W-L anyway. So, fine with me.
A county-wide system defeats one of the great advantages of public schools: going to school with kids in your neighborhood or at least 5-10 minutes away. No need to balance the three high schools -- let them each retain their own identity.
^^segregationist
Says a south Arlington parent who is just looking for a way to get their schools rated higher by shipping the problem kids to a different school that they weren't able to afford.
No, I'm the person who wrote "segregationist." (And I was joking.) I'm also the person whose teens walk to W-L.
I do think the "walkable neighborhood" argument is pretty much BS for high school. Again, my kids walk to W-L, it's a nice benefit. I don't think it outweighs other important county/school system concerns.
sorry, hit return to quickly. I meant to add--While I was joking that the PP was a segregationist, you might be. You are definitely a jerk.
W-L parent--disagree.,,walkability is huge for me. Keeps my kids from having to drive. They walk home after sports practices. Don't worry about bus schedules, etc.
My FFxco HS was a 30 minute car ride. My siblings and I had are fair share of dents and accidents to the family car. The school parking lot was also a nightmare.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The segregationists are always championing walkability, and strong communities.
They are never going to admit we could do a county wide system. They paid too much money for an almost all wealthy school.
I live within walking distance of W-L, and I'm happy my teens can walk to school.
That said, if APS went to a county-wide system tomorrow, I'd say, great! Arlington is definitely small enough, and my kids wouldn't spend any more time on a bus then I did when I was there age (in a rural area). And of course, there'd be at least a 33% chance they'd end up at W-L anyway. So, fine with me.
A county-wide system defeats one of the great advantages of public schools: going to school with kids in your neighborhood or at least 5-10 minutes away. No need to balance the three high schools -- let them each retain their own identity.
^^segregationist
Says a south Arlington parent who is just looking for a way to get their schools rated higher by shipping the problem kids to a different school that they weren't able to afford.
No, I'm the person who wrote "segregationist." (And I was joking.) I'm also the person whose teens walk to W-L.
I do think the "walkable neighborhood" argument is pretty much BS for high school. Again, my kids walk to W-L, it's a nice benefit. I don't think it outweighs other important county/school system concerns.
sorry, hit return to quickly. I meant to add--While I was joking that the PP was a segregationist, you might be. You are definitely a jerk.
Apology accepted South Arlington parent
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The segregationists are always championing walkability, and strong communities.
They are never going to admit we could do a county wide system. They paid too much money for an almost all wealthy school.
I live within walking distance of W-L, and I'm happy my teens can walk to school.
That said, if APS went to a county-wide system tomorrow, I'd say, great! Arlington is definitely small enough, and my kids wouldn't spend any more time on a bus then I did when I was there age (in a rural area). And of course, there'd be at least a 33% chance they'd end up at W-L anyway. So, fine with me.
A county-wide system defeats one of the great advantages of public schools: going to school with kids in your neighborhood or at least 5-10 minutes away. No need to balance the three high schools -- let them each retain their own identity.
^^segregationist
Says a south Arlington parent who is just looking for a way to get their schools rated higher by shipping the problem kids to a different school that they weren't able to afford.
No, I'm the person who wrote "segregationist." (And I was joking.) I'm also the person whose teens walk to W-L.
I do think the "walkable neighborhood" argument is pretty much BS for high school. Again, my kids walk to W-L, it's a nice benefit. I don't think it outweighs other important county/school system concerns.
sorry, hit return to quickly. I meant to add--While I was joking that the PP was a segregationist, you might be. You are definitely a jerk.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The segregationists are always championing walkability, and strong communities.
They are never going to admit we could do a county wide system. They paid too much money for an almost all wealthy school.
I live within walking distance of W-L, and I'm happy my teens can walk to school.
That said, if APS went to a county-wide system tomorrow, I'd say, great! Arlington is definitely small enough, and my kids wouldn't spend any more time on a bus then I did when I was there age (in a rural area). And of course, there'd be at least a 33% chance they'd end up at W-L anyway. So, fine with me.
A county-wide system defeats one of the great advantages of public schools: going to school with kids in your neighborhood or at least 5-10 minutes away. No need to balance the three high schools -- let them each retain their own identity.
^^segregationist
Says a south Arlington parent who is just looking for a way to get their schools rated higher by shipping the problem kids to a different school that they weren't able to afford.
No, I'm the person who wrote "segregationist." (And I was joking.) I'm also the person whose teens walk to W-L.
I do think the "walkable neighborhood" argument is pretty much BS for high school. Again, my kids walk to W-L, it's a nice benefit. I don't think it outweighs other important county/school system concerns.
sorry, hit return to quickly. I meant to add--While I was joking that the PP was a segregationist, you might be. You are definitely a jerk.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The segregationists are always championing walkability, and strong communities.
They are never going to admit we could do a county wide system. They paid too much money for an almost all wealthy school.
I live within walking distance of W-L, and I'm happy my teens can walk to school.
That said, if APS went to a county-wide system tomorrow, I'd say, great! Arlington is definitely small enough, and my kids wouldn't spend any more time on a bus then I did when I was there age (in a rural area). And of course, there'd be at least a 33% chance they'd end up at W-L anyway. So, fine with me.
A county-wide system defeats one of the great advantages of public schools: going to school with kids in your neighborhood or at least 5-10 minutes away. No need to balance the three high schools -- let them each retain their own identity.
^^segregationist
Says a south Arlington parent who is just looking for a way to get their schools rated higher by shipping the problem kids to a different school that they weren't able to afford.
No, I'm the person who wrote "segregationist." (And I was joking.) I'm also the person whose teens walk to W-L.
I do think the "walkable neighborhood" argument is pretty much BS for high school. Again, my kids walk to W-L, it's a nice benefit. I don't think it outweighs other important county/school system concerns.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The segregationists are always championing walkability, and strong communities.
They are never going to admit we could do a county wide system. They paid too much money for an almost all wealthy school.
I live within walking distance of W-L, and I'm happy my teens can walk to school.
That said, if APS went to a county-wide system tomorrow, I'd say, great! Arlington is definitely small enough, and my kids wouldn't spend any more time on a bus then I did when I was there age (in a rural area). And of course, there'd be at least a 33% chance they'd end up at W-L anyway. So, fine with me.
A county-wide system defeats one of the great advantages of public schools: going to school with kids in your neighborhood or at least 5-10 minutes away. No need to balance the three high schools -- let them each retain their own identity.
^^segregationist
Says a south Arlington parent who is just looking for a way to get their schools rated higher by shipping the problem kids to a different school that they weren't able to afford.
Anonymous wrote:The segregationists are always championing walkability, and strong communities.
They are never going to admit we could do a county wide system. They paid too much money for an almost all wealthy school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The segregationists are always championing walkability, and strong communities.
They are never going to admit we could do a county wide system. They paid too much money for an almost all wealthy school.
I live within walking distance of W-L, and I'm happy my teens can walk to school.
That said, if APS went to a county-wide system tomorrow, I'd say, great! Arlington is definitely small enough, and my kids wouldn't spend any more time on a bus then I did when I was there age (in a rural area). And of course, there'd be at least a 33% chance they'd end up at W-L anyway. So, fine with me.
A county-wide system defeats one of the great advantages of public schools: going to school with kids in your neighborhood or at least 5-10 minutes away. No need to balance the three high schools -- let them each retain their own identity.
^^segregationist
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The segregationists are always championing walkability, and strong communities.
They are never going to admit we could do a county wide system. They paid too much money for an almost all wealthy school.
I live within walking distance of W-L, and I'm happy my teens can walk to school.
That said, if APS went to a county-wide system tomorrow, I'd say, great! Arlington is definitely small enough, and my kids wouldn't spend any more time on a bus then I did when I was there age (in a rural area). And of course, there'd be at least a 33% chance they'd end up at W-L anyway. So, fine with me.
A county-wide system defeats one of the great advantages of public schools: going to school with kids in your neighborhood or at least 5-10 minutes away. No need to balance the three high schools -- let them each retain their own identity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The segregationists are always championing walkability, and strong communities.
They are never going to admit we could do a county wide system. They paid too much money for an almost all wealthy school.
I live within walking distance of W-L, and I'm happy my teens can walk to school.
That said, if APS went to a county-wide system tomorrow, I'd say, great! Arlington is definitely small enough, and my kids wouldn't spend any more time on a bus then I did when I was there age (in a rural area). And of course, there'd be at least a 33% chance they'd end up at W-L anyway. So, fine with me.