Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Poor Archduke Ferdinand, take two.

Republicans: this is on you. Whatever mess comes after this, repeat that to yourself and know that we Hillary voters know: this is on you.

Okay we will take this

You take Benghazi and the Iraq war

The Iraq War, seriously?!?!?!?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Poor Archduke Ferdinand, take two.

Republicans: this is on you. Whatever mess comes after this, repeat that to yourself and know that we Hillary voters know: this is on you.

Okay we will take this



You take Benghazi and the Iraq war

Cray, cray. Iraq belongs to Cheney, Powell, Rumsfeld, Halliburton, and wolfowitz.

Supported by the US Senate, including the junior senator from New York

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kremlin is now saying that NATO planned the attack

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4049216/Russian-ambassador-s-assassination-Turkey-organised-NATO-secret-services-provocation-challenge-Moscow-claims-Kremlin-senator.html

And really, why not? The US under Trump won't say anything different. Trump would say "I don't know who did it, maybe it was NATO", even after intelligence briefings tell him who was actually behind it.

Trump has a whole lotta power for a guy who isn't even in office for a month.

DP. What does the above have to do with Trump having power?

What's Obama going to do NOW?

Why does Trump or Obama have to do anything. What am I missing. This happened in Turlkey to a Russian diplomat.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Poor Archduke Ferdinand, take two.

Republicans: this is on you. Whatever mess comes after this, repeat that to yourself and know that we Hillary voters know: this is on you.

Okay we will take this



You take Benghazi and the Iraq war

Cray, cray. Iraq belongs to Cheney, Powell, Rumsfeld, Halliburton, and wolfowitz.

Anonymous wrote:Kremlin is now saying that NATO planned the attack

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4049216/Russian-ambassador-s-assassination-Turkey-organised-NATO-secret-services-provocation-challenge-Moscow-claims-Kremlin-senator.html

Oh well, trump hates NATO. He says that it should be desolved.

Anonymous wrote:Poor Archduke Ferdinand, take two.

Republicans: this is on you. Whatever mess comes after this, repeat that to yourself and know that we Hillary voters know: this is on you.

Okay we will take this

You take Benghazi and the Iraq war

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kremlin is now saying that NATO planned the attack

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4049216/Russian-ambassador-s-assassination-Turkey-organised-NATO-secret-services-provocation-challenge-Moscow-claims-Kremlin-senator.html

And really, why not? The US under Trump won't say anything different. Trump would say "I don't know who did it, maybe it was NATO", even after intelligence briefings tell him who was actually behind it.

He would blame it on the 400 pound fat person that is also doing the hacking...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kremlin is now saying that NATO planned the attack

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4049216/Russian-ambassador-s-assassination-Turkey-organised-NATO-secret-services-provocation-challenge-Moscow-claims-Kremlin-senator.html

And really, why not? The US under Trump won't say anything different. Trump would say "I don't know who did it, maybe it was NATO", even after intelligence briefings tell him who was actually behind it.

Trump has a whole lotta power for a guy who isn't even in office for a month.

DP. What does the above have to do with Trump having power?

What's Obama going to do NOW?

Hand it all over to Trump on the 20th of January. Shall he start a war over this? With whom? Keep in mind we need Turkey to have access to the middle east and airspace. Also, this seems a bit well timed to react quickly, as that is what it seems to be provoking.

Russia is blaming NATO for this planned attack. Shall we withdraw from NATO?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kremlin is now saying that NATO planned the attack

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4049216/Russian-ambassador-s-assassination-Turkey-organised-NATO-secret-services-provocation-challenge-Moscow-claims-Kremlin-senator.html

And really, why not? The US under Trump won't say anything different. Trump would say "I don't know who did it, maybe it was NATO", even after intelligence briefings tell him who was actually behind it.

Trump has a whole lotta power for a guy who isn't even in office for a month.

DP. What does the above have to do with Trump having power?

What's Obama going to do NOW?

What will Mr.Putin say??

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kremlin is now saying that NATO planned the attack

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4049216/Russian-ambassador-s-assassination-Turkey-organised-NATO-secret-services-provocation-challenge-Moscow-claims-Kremlin-senator.html

And really, why not? The US under Trump won't say anything different. Trump would say "I don't know who did it, maybe it was NATO", even after intelligence briefings tell him who was actually behind it.

Trump has a whole lotta power for a guy who isn't even in office for a month.

DP. What does the above have to do with Trump having power?

What's Obama going to do NOW?

Anonymous wrote:OK, so the Turks are investigating ties to Fethullah Gulen and Russian media is positing possible CIA ties. Pick your own convenient narrative!

are you a gulenist?

The murder is a provocation.

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More from NY Times:

The gunman, wearing a dark suit and tie, was seen in video footage of the assault shouting in Arabic: “God is great! Those who pledged allegiance to Muhammad for jihad. God is great!”

OK maybe that's not radical Islamic terrorism, let's call it Sinn Fein or Shining Path.

You happy now?

Are you trying to make yourself look stupid? If so, you are doing a good job.

No, trying to make you look smart, but I give up.

Actually, you made that look effortless. Thanks.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More from NY Times:

The gunman, wearing a dark suit and tie, was seen in video footage of the assault shouting in Arabic: “God is great! Those who pledged allegiance to Muhammad for jihad. God is great!”

OK maybe that's not radical Islamic terrorism, let's call it Sinn Fein or Shining Path.

You happy now?

? OK, so when Sinn Fein was bombing the UK should we have said that all Catholics were terrorists, and they were the enemies?

Back in the 70's or thereabouts some Puerto Ricans bombed a restaurant in NY. IRA was an internal conflict. Radical Islamic terrorists are not internal conflicts. Sunni and Shiite fighting predates us even knowing where those places are on a map. India v Islam helped create Pakistan?

Many Americans helped fund the IRA. Should the UK govt have consindered these Americans to be terrorists, too?

In any case, that PP is the one who called out Sinn Fein, not me. I was just using that PPs logic.

Pakistan was created as a result of the British empire collapsing, when they left India.

I know, let's blame the British. My British DH oftens says this sort of as a joke.

Peter King is a terrorist.

Well, now who better to go after terrorists than a terrorist supporter:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/mar/10/peter-king-muslim-hearings-ira-supporter

"Peter King, the force behind the hearings into homegrown Islamist terrorists on US soil, has offered repeated pronouncements over the threat posed by al-Qaida since 9/11.

But as one Democrat slyly reminded the New York Republican during the committee hearing, King too faces accusations of aiding extremist organisations.

King is a long-time supporter of the IRA, and in the 1980s proclaimed: "If civilians are killed in an attack on a military installation it is certainly regrettable, but I will not morally blame the IRA for it."

King gained further notoriety for his support for the IRA when he was kicked out of a Belfast courtroom during a murder trial. The judge called him an "obvious collaborator"..."

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More from NY Times:

The gunman, wearing a dark suit and tie, was seen in video footage of the assault shouting in Arabic: “God is great! Those who pledged allegiance to Muhammad for jihad. God is great!”

OK maybe that's not radical Islamic terrorism, let's call it Sinn Fein or Shining Path.

You happy now?

Are you trying to make yourself look stupid? If so, you are doing a good job.

No, trying to make you look smart, but I give up.