Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I attended. Don't have much time to write up but what I heard was encouraging. In the pilot areas the same test is administered but on computer so it can be scored faster. There are no plans to change the selection criteria. Selection for the in school HGCs will be centralized. So what we are ending up with is more seats and more kids tested which all sounds reasonable.
Math... there are 2x more kids are in math 4/5 than 5/6 this year since they softened up the criteria. This sounds like a mistake to me.
So if only 10 kids meet the criteria at those schools, they will have one small class?
NP... at our school, the compacted math kids are in the same math class as on track kids. The teacher has to teach both. Not ideal iMO.
Anonymous wrote:What do they mean by no plans to change the selection criteria? So would the median scores be similar at that school-based center as in previous years for that cluster?
If so that really makes my mind bend because that means that maybe there are enough kids at many many schools for a full HGC class?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I attended. Don't have much time to write up but what I heard was encouraging. In the pilot areas the same test is administered but on computer so it can be scored faster. There are no plans to change the selection criteria. Selection for the in school HGCs will be centralized. So what we are ending up with is more seats and more kids tested which all sounds reasonable.
Math... there are 2x more kids are in math 4/5 than 5/6 this year since they softened up the criteria. This sounds like a mistake to me.
So if only 10 kids meet the criteria at those schools, they will have one small class?
NP... at our school, the compacted math kids are in the same math class as on track kids. The teacher has to teach both. Not ideal iMO.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I attended. Don't have much time to write up but what I heard was encouraging. In the pilot areas the same test is administered but on computer so it can be scored faster. There are no plans to change the selection criteria. Selection for the in school HGCs will be centralized. So what we are ending up with is more seats and more kids tested which all sounds reasonable.
Math... there are 2x more kids are in math 4/5 than 5/6 this year since they softened up the criteria. This sounds like a mistake to me.
So if only 10 kids meet the criteria at those schools, they will have one small class?
Anonymous wrote:I attended. Don't have much time to write up but what I heard was encouraging. In the pilot areas the same test is administered but on computer so it can be scored faster. There are no plans to change the selection criteria. Selection for the in school HGCs will be centralized. So what we are ending up with is more seats and more kids tested which all sounds reasonable.
Math... there are 2x more kids are in math 4/5 than 5/6 this year since they softened up the criteria. This sounds like a mistake to me.
Anonymous wrote:I attended. Don't have much time to write up but what I heard was encouraging. In the pilot areas the same test is administered but on computer so it can be scored faster. There are no plans to change the selection criteria. Selection for the in school HGCs will be centralized. So what we are ending up with is more seats and more kids tested which all sounds reasonable.
Math... there are 2x more kids are in math 4/5 than 5/6 this year since they softened up the criteria. This sounds like a mistake to me.