Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did anyone watch the public hearing last night? Did people show up to speak?
About 6 current BASIS parents or prospective parents spoke. All were supportive of the expansion.
10:52 PP here. Also a current BASIS parent. I'd love to hear what they had to say -- what were their reasons for being in favor. I'm not against, but I'm not in favor either -- I just don't understand it well enough.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did anyone watch the public hearing last night? Did people show up to speak?
About 6 current BASIS parents or prospective parents spoke. All were supportive of the expansion.
Anonymous wrote:Did anyone watch the public hearing last night? Did people show up to speak?
Anonymous wrote:Did anyone watch the public hearing last night? Did people show up to speak?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is quite different from any other elementary school in the city.
For starters students would begin changing classes / having different teachers for different core subjects in early elementary (but not K).
Has anyone else read this yet?
OK, that is the one thing that is NOT different -- there are other schools (JKLMs) that change classes and have subject matter specialized teachers at least by 4th, and at least one does starting in 1st.
All the rest of what they plan for this school is what makes it "quite different" and, IMHO, nuts.
Anonymous wrote:This is quite different from any other elementary school in the city.
For starters students would begin changing classes / having different teachers for different core subjects in early elementary (but not K).
Has anyone else read this yet?
Anonymous wrote:There are usually interesting tidbits in the capacity interviews, and the one for BASIS expansion is here. I don't have time to go through all 100_ pages, but maybe someone else does. Charter Board public hearing is tomorrow:
http://www.livebinders.com/play/play?id=2095787#anchor
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another BASIS DC parent--+1000 to the post above.
Also, to all parents who may have signed the list of parents interested in getting more information on the plans for a Basis primary last year--even if your desire for info had nothing to do with sending your child to a Basis elementary and/or you were just concerned about how the primary school might impact your child who was already at BDC, the school is purporting in their proposal to the PCSB that you and all the other parents interested in information are in fact clamoring for them to create a BDC elementary. They are now also proposing that 20% more students be allowed to occupy their Penn Quarter building.
I would not believe everything you read on DCurbanmom. I was told otherwise in regards to the number of students so I will not believe this unless I see a link to a document saying otherwise.
As for the elementary school model, everyone is making assumptions that their model will be drill and kill and be age inappropriate. I will not make this assumption at all since I have found their middle school methods age appropriate for the most part. The only thing I would like to see is a shorter school day and 10 to 20% less homework. But otherwise, the content they have covered and the methods they have used I believe are very accessible. A student will have a harder time if they are years behind or have little exposure to academic content.
Our kid had a lot of exposure to the sort of things BASIS will most likely be covering in elementary school from what I can tell in age appropriate ways. Kids can actually learn a lot about history, grammar, science and so on at young ages in very fun ways. I think there is this notion that kids are unable to this which I think is wrong. Also, kids who go to a BASIS elementary school will most likely be more prepared for middle and high schools.
Project enrollment/capacity for 8th street building is on page 3 of the proposal http://www.dcpcsb.org/sites/default/files/report/2016-09-02%20BASIS%20DC%20ES%20Amendment%20Application%20REDACTED.compressed.pdf
Read pages 10-50 at the same link and decide for yourself if the approach is appropriate.
-BDC middle school parent who read 100+ pages of this and would vote NO
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:By having so many kids held back, it would create a lot of kids who by 9th grade, are considered "at risk" since one of the at-risk categories is being a high school student who is a year or more behind in credits for age.
That creates a whole bunch more kids who are eligible for the at-risk preference for Wilson and other high schools, should that be implemented. It will be interesting to see how that all plays out.
In this case, I think "held back" is a euphemism for getting "counseled out".