Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am not involved because it is boring & fluffy.
Makes sense.
Now, you donate you due, correct?
My taxes are my due.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our PTA is a clique of mean moms who get botox, wear make-up to pick-up, and stuff their boobs in push-up bras. Tried to fit in, but I'm 40-lb overweight with only chapstick and clothes that make me look like a sausage. I was the clearly the un-cool person there, no one talked to me, and one of the mean girls (not the official PTA president, but clearly the "leader" basically told me that I didn't have any good ideas on the one time that I spoke up).
That sounds about right.
Anonymous wrote:Our PTA is a clique of mean moms who get botox, wear make-up to pick-up, and stuff their boobs in push-up bras. Tried to fit in, but I'm 40-lb overweight with only chapstick and clothes that make me look like a sausage. I was the clearly the un-cool person there, no one talked to me, and one of the mean girls (not the official PTA president, but clearly the "leader" basically told me that I didn't have any good ideas on the one time that I spoke up).
Anonymous wrote:Can't figure out how to join. I thought I was signing up at back-to-school night, but haven't heard anything since about meetings, etc. Similarly, I believe there's also a school listserv but can't for my life figure out how to get added.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am not involved because it is boring & fluffy.
Makes sense.
Now, you donate you due, correct?
Anonymous wrote:Just time. I have the utmost respect for those who do it, but I mostly just can't figure out where to fit it. I make the effort to introduce myself to the more active parents (some of whom are also part of 2-working parent households). I'll write a check and show up to a couple of events during the year. (I offered to help with the school garden this year but haven't heard back.) But I lack the time energy or talent to be an involved organizer type. Most of my day is scheduled in 10 minute increments, I get about 3 hours of straight family time at the end of the workday, and 5 hours of sleep at night. Weekends are a little looser, but I like to keep them that way to keep myself sane.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:An inordinate amount of PTA time is spent on planning, staffing, and follow up from fundraisers. I say just give me a $ amount at the beginning of the year and I'm happy to write a check for the year.
+10000
+ a million...assuming you actually cut the check.
Some folks prefer to be free-raiders, investing no time or money in their kids' school.
Amen, sometimes I wish parents were interviewed prior to enrolling their child into school so they can have an understanding of the support needed. Write a check or get involved.
This is such a DC fear. Someone, somewhere is getting away with something and we have to stop them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A NPR story on the radio featuring this article:
http://www.houstonpublicmedia.org/articles/news/2014/12/16/54797/pasadena-schools-experiment-with-charlas-to-help-students-by-coaching-their-parents/
"“We found that most forms of parental involvement yield no benefit to children’s test scores or grades regardless of their racial or ethnic background or socioeconomic status.”
Robinson found traditional activities like attending PTA meetings didn’t help.
But he said a few things can make a difference.
“The list of what consistently works is pretty short. That would be expecting your child to go to college, regularly discussing activities that your child engages in at school and requesting a particular teacher for your child,” he said."
This is not surprising. Our school has a PTA funded program that doesn't appear to be audited or measured for performance in any way. Everyone loves to talk about our unique "XXXX" program but nobody can answer basics questions about how the program is measured for effectiveness and impact or why the PTA continues to fund it year after year. So we will keep paying $00 because everybody thinks the program is so great and some of us are wondering why we don't consider other programs.
I think you and other posters are confused about the study cited in the NPR study.
There are two different propositions here:
1) the attendance of low-income parents at PTA meetings does not improve the test scores of the children of those parents. Other involvements are more effective for engaging these parents, for example the "charlas" discussed in the article.
2) PTA-funded programming is ineffective at raising the test scores of children or meaningfully contribuing to their education.
The study established (1). It didn't say anything about (2), and we know that (2) is false because for example, PTAs can fund these types of charlas and also tutoring, enrichment, classroom aides, and many things that help students.