Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not saying that this letter by her doctor is hiding anything. But, anyone with a decent level of intelligence can see that it is a carefully worded letter.

For instance "Mrs. Clinton’s current medications include (comprise or contain as part of a whole) Armor Thyroid, Coumadin dosed as directed, Levaquin (for a total ten days), Clarinex, as well as B12 as needed."

This does not rule out the fact there are no other medications. If in fact these were the only medications shouldn't the letter state, Mrs. Clinton's current medications are.....

Again, this isn't to allude there is more (unfortunately you have to state that here) but to point out that anyone that takes this as an absolute assessment of her health is being foolish. As is anyone that declares there is more without proof. Considering she is running for the highest office of the land one would hope that there isn't in fact anything else.

She's an attorney. What did you expect?

She's hounded by people like you. So if she throws away a tube of Icy-Hot, one of you will jump out of the bushes to grab it and say "Aha! She has not been giving us the whole truth!" And suddenly there will be a series of youtube videos showing how she has degenerative bone disease followed by an analysis of her gait, and then she will need a note from her doctor to prove that she is not due for a hip replacement any day now. And if you think that's unlikely, please refer to the "seizure pen" hoax.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not saying that this letter by her doctor is hiding anything. But, anyone with a decent level of intelligence can see that it is a carefully worded letter.

For instance "Mrs. Clinton’s current medications include (comprise or contain as part of a whole) Armor Thyroid, Coumadin dosed as directed, Levaquin (for a total ten days), Clarinex, as well as B12 as needed."

This does not rule out the fact there are no other medications. If in fact these were the only medications shouldn't the letter state, Mrs. Clinton's current medications are.....

Again, this isn't to allude there is more (unfortunately you have to state that here) but to point out that anyone that takes this as an absolute assessment of her health is being foolish. As is anyone that declares there is more without proof. Considering she is running for the highest office of the land one would hope that there isn't in fact anything else.

She's an attorney. What did you expect?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not saying that this letter by her doctor is hiding anything. But, anyone with a decent level of intelligence can see that it is a carefully worded letter.

For instance "Mrs. Clinton’s current medications include (comprise or contain as part of a whole) Armor Thyroid, Coumadin dosed as directed, Levaquin (for a total ten days), Clarinex, as well as B12 as needed."

This does not rule out the fact there are no other medications. If in fact these were the only medications shouldn't the letter state, Mrs. Clinton's current medications are.....

Again, this isn't to allude there is more (unfortunately you have to state that here) but to point out that anyone that takes this as an absolute assessment of her health is being foolish. As is anyone that declares there is more without proof. Considering she is running for the highest office of the land one would hope that there isn't in fact anything else.

She's an attorney. What did you expect?

Anonymous wrote:Not saying that this letter by her doctor is hiding anything. But, anyone with a decent level of intelligence can see that it is a carefully worded letter.

For instance "Mrs. Clinton’s current medications include (comprise or contain as part of a whole) Armor Thyroid, Coumadin dosed as directed, Levaquin (for a total ten days), Clarinex, as well as B12 as needed."

This does not rule out the fact there are no other medications. If in fact these were the only medications shouldn't the letter state, Mrs. Clinton's current medications are.....

Again, this isn't to allude there is more (unfortunately you have to state that here) but to point out that anyone that takes this as an absolute assessment of her health is being foolish. As is anyone that declares there is more without proof. Considering she is running for the highest office of the land one would hope that there isn't in fact anything else.

Anonymous wrote:
What all this tells is that fainting is very common and associated with dehydration most of the time, because when you are going to rallies of presidential candidates or presidents, you usually go through long security lines where you most likely cant carry water bottles and its a long and tiring process. The same logic applies to those who are speaking in rallies, plus exhaustion by months of speaking and easy to be dehydrated.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think team Clinton is giving us the full story. This statement seems parsed to death which is typical of the Clinton team. Hillary clearly has a neurological problem - probably Parkinsons. She is purposely avoiding obtaining an official diagnosis until after the election so she can claim she did not lie about this. The nonsense about she is fully mentally capable does not mean she doesn't have Parkinsons. A reporter needs to ask her point blank about possible neurological problems.

Might be the reason she has not had a press conference in over a year? Hmmmm.

If you ignore the three in the last two weeks.

You really call those press conferences? LOL

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think team Clinton is giving us the full story. This statement seems parsed to death which is typical of the Clinton team. Hillary clearly has a neurological problem - probably Parkinsons. She is purposely avoiding obtaining an official diagnosis until after the election so she can claim she did not lie about this. The nonsense about she is fully mentally capable does not mean she doesn't have Parkinsons. A reporter needs to ask her point blank about possible neurological problems.

Her doctor is not qualified to evaluate her mental condition. She needs to be examined by a neurologist.

They didn't reveal she had a surgery in March for sinus and ear infection. She was already on antibiotics on September 2, but still lie about her cough after Labor Day. You really can't trust her on telling you the full picture ever.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think team Clinton is giving us the full story. This statement seems parsed to death which is typical of the Clinton team. Hillary clearly has a neurological problem - probably Parkinsons. She is purposely avoiding obtaining an official diagnosis until after the election so she can claim she did not lie about this. The nonsense about she is fully mentally capable does not mean she doesn't have Parkinsons. A reporter needs to ask her point blank about possible neurological problems.

Her doctor is not qualified to evaluate her mental condition. She needs to be examined by a neurologist.

They didn't reveal she had a surgery in March for sinus and ear infection. She was already on antibiotics on September 2, but still lie about her cough after Labor Day. You really can't trust her on telling you the full picture ever.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think team Clinton is giving us the full story. This statement seems parsed to death which is typical of the Clinton team. Hillary clearly has a neurological problem - probably Parkinsons. She is purposely avoiding obtaining an official diagnosis until after the election so she can claim she did not lie about this. The nonsense about she is fully mentally capable does not mean she doesn't have Parkinsons. A reporter needs to ask her point blank about possible neurological problems.

Her doctor is not qualified to evaluate her mental condition. She needs to be examined by a neurologist.

They didn't reveal she had a surgery in March for sinus and ear infection. She was already on antibiotics on September 2, but still lie about her cough after Labor Day. You really can't trust her on telling you the full picture ever.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think team Clinton is giving us the full story. This statement seems parsed to death which is typical of the Clinton team. Hillary clearly has a neurological problem - probably Parkinsons. She is purposely avoiding obtaining an official diagnosis until after the election so she can claim she did not lie about this. The nonsense about she is fully mentally capable does not mean she doesn't have Parkinsons. A reporter needs to ask her point blank about possible neurological problems.

Might be the reason she has not had a press conference in over a year? Hmmmm.

If you ignore the three in the last two weeks.

They literally live in an alternate universe

You are right. The Clintons have no clue how the “little people” live. They are in an alternate universe.

Anonymous wrote:I don't think team Clinton is giving us the full story. This statement seems parsed to death which is typical of the Clinton team. Hillary clearly has a neurological problem - probably Parkinsons. She is purposely avoiding obtaining an official diagnosis until after the election so she can claim she did not lie about this. The nonsense about she is fully mentally capable does not mean she doesn't have Parkinsons. A reporter needs to ask her point blank about possible neurological problems.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hilary's vitals are really good. And they did a ct scan of her heart and her brain, both normal. Based on this she would be low risk from an actuarial basis.

You obviously don't have a clue about actuarial science. Just because her pulse and bp is good, and a ct of her heart and brain is normal, there are a 100 other things that can affect a persons health and mortality.

You mean the actuarial science that greatly favors a 68-year-old woman whose mother died at 92, over a 70-year-old man whose father died in his early 70s from Alzheimer's which she was diagnosed with in his late 60s?

No, the fact that isolating someones health to one or two areas, which is that the pp did, is not enough. Family history is nice but it only plays a more significant part if there is a history of major illness and death in close family members at a young age. No one that knows anything about this would make such a statement as above. There is a reason there are a lot of questions asked about a persons health and lifestyle to determine what group they might fit in. In Hillary's case we already have a history of blood clots. Did her mother have that same history?

BTW, she is taking the coumadin for DVT and we know that is an effective treatment yet it recurred even so. But, DVT is a life threatening illness and can strike at any time and there are additional risk factors in taking blood thinners.

So, this isn't an assessment of her overall health, just rebutting the silly notion that a ct of someone's heart and brain, along with good blood pressure and heart rate, makes her a low risk from an actuarial standpoint.

I can't speak to actuarial science, but I can say that the brain CT rules out Parkinson's and stroke.

"There is no specific test for Parkinson’s disease, making it sometimes a difficult condition to diagnose, especially early on. Parkinsonism - the group of signs and symptoms of Parkinson’s disease - may have other causes, such as dementia with Lewy bodies, progressive supranuclear palsy, as well as some antipsychotic medication, toxins, head injuries, and some types of stroke."

"most MRI or CT scans of people with Parkinson's disease will appear normal."

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/info/parkinsons-disease/parkinsons-disease-diagnosis.php

Is that so?

http://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2014-06-12-mri-brain-scans-detect-people-early-parkinsons#

Did you read this rather interesting report?
"Conventional MRI cannot detect early signs of Parkinson's, so the Oxford researchers used an MRI technique, called resting-state fMRI, in which people are simply required to stay still in the scanner. They used the MRI data to look at the 'connectivity', or strength of brain networks, in the basal ganglia – part of the brain known to be involved in Parkinson's disease."

It appears they are onto something and are pursuing it further.

But, this does not mean they are using this technique here. It is an evolving science. And, she had a CT of the brain, not an MRI.

She didn't get an MRI because she doesn't have Parkinson's. Except in your head

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think team Clinton is giving us the full story. This statement seems parsed to death which is typical of the Clinton team. Hillary clearly has a neurological problem - probably Parkinsons. She is purposely avoiding obtaining an official diagnosis until after the election so she can claim she did not lie about this. The nonsense about she is fully mentally capable does not mean she doesn't have Parkinsons. A reporter needs to ask her point blank about possible neurological problems.

Might be the reason she has not had a press conference in over a year? Hmmmm.

If you ignore the three in the last two weeks.

Anonymous wrote:http://www.omicsonline.org/magnetic-resonance-imaging-mri-in-parkinsons-disease-2161-0460.S1-001.php?aid=11918