Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's from Obama and Mooch country and like them, she has an ugly mouth and no class. Even living in the South with her sexual predator husband didn't get her manners. You can't fake Southern Charm no matter how down home you pretend to be.

The Clintons have been and will always be WHITE TRASH WITH MONEY they stole.

You just summed up Trump and his supporters right there.

By not paying people he owes money to, he has stolen money from them.

Many white trash are voting for him.

This is just a tit for tat, really. They are both bad, but he takes it to a whole new level with the amount outright lies compared to HRC, and his hateful rhetoric.

Please, could you not throw around the term "white trash"? It's a pejorative.

I'm done with the double standard. There are plenty of poor whites working hard each day to support themselves and their families. Maybe they live in a trailer home. Maybe they live in the middle of nowhere. Maybe they live in the inner city.

But referring to them as white trash is just as bad as other pejorative terms given to minorities.

But isn't this the season of anti-political correctness?

If that's the case, then all of the pejorative terms assigned to minorities should be resurrected, too, right?

Your game is a losing one, PP.

Anonymous wrote:Hillary attacks voters again labeling Trump supporters "Irredeemable" and "Not American".

Hitler labeled Jews "Irredeemable" and "Not German".

Wonder what Hillary will propose doing with the "Irredeemable", "Not American" Trump supporters if she wins?

Hillary: A Quarter Of America Is ‘Irredeemable,’ ‘Not America’

http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/10/hillary-a-quarter-of-america-is-irredeemable-not-america/



Hear that? That's the sound of a failing campaign.

I believe the elitist-leftist "no label" crowd just pulled out the labeling machine!

Anonymous wrote:Did she actually say that half the Trump supporters are "irredeemable"? That's actually worse than deplorable. It's like saying a good segment of her subjects....oops, I mean constituents... are hopeless. Did she really say that??

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The bottom line is America doesn't like liars, regardless of the complicit media trying to sweep under the rug Clintons past.

This is her 47% moment. This morning on CSPAN radio, one woman from Florida, who sounded like an African American Trump supporter, was very upset to the point that she was sobbing on the air ... "I am not a deplorable person ..."

Anonymous wrote:Anytime someone claims they're a former Republican, just discount it. If they have to work that hard to claim middle of the road objectivity by dropping BS, you know they're full of it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

But isn't this the season of anti-political correctness?

For most anyone else, yes. For the establishment, race-baiting, former Tammy Wynette Senator, no. She's disgusting.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The bottom line is America doesn't like liars, regardless of the complicit media trying to sweep under the rug Clintons past.

Which is why they hate Trump. Biggest liar of them all. Shockingly so. He just makes stuff up right and left. The man has no honest bone in his body.

Sensationalize - yes

Lies - no

The narrative of the left is to push an agenda that Grubernation has seen already. Worked with McCain and Romney, won't with a fighter like Trump.

? uh.. yes. He is the biggest liar of them all. HRC lies don't even compare to Trump's. I just don't understand how his supporters keep talking about what a liar she is when he's an even bigger liar, by far. Do these people not bother to read and check facts?

Please check the facts:

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/

The majority of things he's stated have been found to be false.

True (4%)(9)
Mostly True (11%)(27)
Half True (15%)(36)
Mostly False (18%)(44)
False (35%)(87)
Pants on Fire (18%)(45)
= 71% mostly false, false, pants on fire false

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/hillary-clinton/

True (22%)(55)
Mostly True 28%)(70)
Half True (22%)(54)
Mostly False (15%)(37)
False (11%)(27)
Pants on Fire (2%)(6)

= 28% mostly false, false, pants on fire false



On the front page, there's nothing he's stated that is even somewhat true; they are all false.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/

And what's your point? that Politifact is unbiased? lol

If you were smarter you'd realize that there's no such thing as objectivity. Interpretations vary, and statistics can be twisted to support multiple sides.


http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/peter-roff/2013/05/28/study-finds-fact-checkers-biased-against-republicans
Who’s Checking the Fact Checkers?
A new study sheds some light on what facts the press most likes to check.

Now comes a study from the George Mason University Center for Media and Public Affairs that demonstrates empirically that PolitiFact.org, one of the nation's leading "fact checkers," finds that Republicans are dishonest in their claims three times as often as Democrats. "PolitiFact.com has rated Republican claims as false three times as often as Democratic claims during President Obama's second term," the Center said in a release, "despite controversies over Obama administration statements on Benghazi, the IRS and the AP."

lol.. usnews is not biased? It's a fluff magazine, never won a pulitzer from what I recall.

I don't understand your point about the GMU study. All it says is that both Repubs and Dems lie. Politifact has stated the same. But, this isn't about Repubs vs Dems, really, because there are many Repubs who are crossing over to vote for HRC (myself included). This is a Trump vs. HRC lies, and I bet if GMU did a study, they'd find Trump lies waaaay more than HRC.

Look, genius - something neg comes out about the Rs, and Breitbart negates it.

But then CNN bites back.

And then FOX News jumps in.

Get it?

There's no such thing as objectivity. A Trump fan is voting for his/her best interests. If that means keeping his coal mining job safe, then he's not wrong. Will you argue against him? saying that his skills are outdated? that his field is dirty? that he deserves to die poor?

A bipartisan president doesn't slam opponents. S/he tries to reach out to folks who are suffering.

Furthermore, people who are racist grow up ignorant. You don't fight ignorance by putting down a group a people with some very harmful and outdated beliefs. You work with them so that their children don't hold onto those same believes.

She doesn't care to do that b/c she's hanging on to the wealthy Libs who snub their noses at the rest of the country. Hollywood, here she comes! Poor whites be damned!

If you can't see HOW that pushes folks toward Trump, then you deserve the president you get.

I wash my hands of this whole election. If that means my third party goes to Trump, so be it. If it goes to Clinton, so be it. I don't favor either one. But I am much angrier at Clinton for being such a hypocrite. She doesn't care about the poor any more than Trump cares about working mothers.

Anonymous wrote:Anytime someone claims they're a former Republican, just discount it. If they have to work that hard to claim middle of the road objectivity by dropping BS, you know they're full of it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The bottom line is America doesn't like liars, regardless of the complicit media trying to sweep under the rug Clintons past.

Which is why they hate Trump. Biggest liar of them all. Shockingly so. He just makes stuff up right and left. The man has no honest bone in his body.

Sensationalize - yes

Lies - no

The narrative of the left is to push an agenda that Grubernation has seen already. Worked with McCain and Romney, won't with a fighter like Trump.

? uh.. yes. He is the biggest liar of them all. HRC lies don't even compare to Trump's. I just don't understand how his supporters keep talking about what a liar she is when he's an even bigger liar, by far. Do these people not bother to read and check facts?

Please check the facts:

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/

The majority of things he's stated have been found to be false.

True (4%)(9)
Mostly True (11%)(27)
Half True (15%)(36)
Mostly False (18%)(44)
False (35%)(87)
Pants on Fire (18%)(45)
= 71% mostly false, false, pants on fire false

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/hillary-clinton/

True (22%)(55)
Mostly True 28%)(70)
Half True (22%)(54)
Mostly False (15%)(37)
False (11%)(27)
Pants on Fire (2%)(6)

= 28% mostly false, false, pants on fire false



On the front page, there's nothing he's stated that is even somewhat true; they are all false.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/

And what's your point? that Politifact is unbiased? lol

If you were smarter you'd realize that there's no such thing as objectivity. Interpretations vary, and statistics can be twisted to support multiple sides.


http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/peter-roff/2013/05/28/study-finds-fact-checkers-biased-against-republicans
Who’s Checking the Fact Checkers?
A new study sheds some light on what facts the press most likes to check.

Now comes a study from the George Mason University Center for Media and Public Affairs that demonstrates empirically that PolitiFact.org, one of the nation's leading "fact checkers," finds that Republicans are dishonest in their claims three times as often as Democrats. "PolitiFact.com has rated Republican claims as false three times as often as Democratic claims during President Obama's second term," the Center said in a release, "despite controversies over Obama administration statements on Benghazi, the IRS and the AP."

lol.. usnews is not biased? It's a fluff magazine, never won a pulitzer from what I recall.

I don't understand your point about the GMU study. All it says is that both Repubs and Dems lie. Politifact has stated the same. But, this isn't about Repubs vs Dems, really, because there are many Repubs who are crossing over to vote for HRC (myself included). This is a Trump vs. HRC lies, and I bet if GMU did a study, they'd find Trump lies waaaay more than HRC.