Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Y’all are just pissed that
a. The speechwriter took full responsibility
b. The speechwriter is a woman
c. Trump did not fire her
....Because, if he had fired her, y’all would be prattling on and on about how he hates women.........
But I thought there was nothing to take responsibility for? I thought these were "common phrases"?
They are common phrases. That's why the writer didn't even bother to go back to check and Melania said it with ease.
Millions of Americans work hard for what they want in life. Whoops, sorry Michelle for infringe on your patents.
Methinks someone doesn't understand how to keep sensitive information safe, but it's not Clinton. Reminder: lots of people, at State, the CIA, etc., send emails to each other, and Clinton's server wasn't hacked. Unlike other government servers...
Yep, the plagiarism wasn't as important as the fact that the campaign staff behaved amateurishly in their failure to contain the scandal. And these people are going to run the country? We're in trouble.Anonymous wrote:It's official. Parts of the speech was plagiarized. Instead of coming upfront when it was called out and said 'hey, we f**ked up. We're moving on. But no. Everybody else was at fault....the press, Clinton, the kid down the street, everybody EXCEPT the Trump camp.
So now they have their fall guy (gal in this case), yet I hear Republicans insist it's not important. They know good and damn well if this had been Clinton they would NOT have been able to contain themselves.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As of 2005, McIver existed.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/20/books/review/ghosts-in-the-machine.html?_r=0
Maybe she is really reclusive.
That's not proof that she exists. That's proof that Trump used the same name for something in 2005. You'll note the NYT author didn't talk to her or anything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand this excuse? If Melania originally told the speechwriter that she admires these remarks of Mrs. Obama, doesn't that indicate that Melania knew they were Mrs. Obama's words when she spoke them at the convention? How does this help things?
It is even better than that. It sounds like Melania actually read the phrases to the speechwriter over the phone. She obviously knew they were Michelle's words.
But there is the underlying issue that Melania did not graduate from college (Although The Donald has promoted that she has). Maybe she does not know what plagiarism is? [I doubt this - but he let's give her the benefit of the doubt]
Oh sure. You need a college degree to know that when you give a speech on TV, don't copy word for word from the speech of someone who presented on a similar occasion.![]()
Maybe I would buy that if she had just read all of Michelle Obama's speech and sat down.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As of 2005, McIver existed.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/20/books/review/ghosts-in-the-machine.html?_r=0
Maybe she is really reclusive.
That's not proof that she exists. That's proof that Trump used the same name for something in 2005. You'll note the NYT author didn't talk to her or anything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The plot thickens: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/meredith-mciver-rnc-speechwriter-melania-trump-donald-trump-allias-a7147081.html
Omg. Too funny if this turns out to be true!
I am dying hereAnonymous wrote:As of 2005, McIver existed.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/20/books/review/ghosts-in-the-machine.html?_r=0
Maybe she is really reclusive.
Anonymous wrote:The plot thickens: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/meredith-mciver-rnc-speechwriter-melania-trump-donald-trump-allias-a7147081.html
Anonymous wrote:The plot thickens: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/meredith-mciver-rnc-speechwriter-melania-trump-donald-trump-allias-a7147081.html
Anonymous wrote:The plot thickens: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/meredith-mciver-rnc-speechwriter-melania-trump-donald-trump-allias-a7147081.html