Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I believe strongly in the classic formula:
((older person's age)/2 + 7 = (lowest partner age))
For a 50 year old:
50/2 + 7 = 32
At 30, you're already a couple of years below a 50 year old's floor. I know 30 is only 2 years young than 32, but the formula is already lenient. It allows for greater differences in age as you get older, as those differences gradually mean less. If he was in his mid-40s, I'd say go for it.
Of course, there are always exceptions. Maybe he is unusually fit and youthful looking, or has enough money or personality to make up for it? Patrick Stewart was the "Sexiest Man in America" in his 50s.
I hate to say it, but unless he has enough money that you don't have to worry about affording medical care, or help around the house as he ages, I would tread cautiously.
Everyone talks of this classic formula, but they forget that this formula was for men from ages 18 to 30 years. It was not for really old guys, like a 60 year old man with a 37 year old woman, Which is quite creepy.
So for a 18 year old :
18/2 + 7 = 16
For a 30 year old man:
30/2 + 7 = 22
Both of those ages work quite well for the *lowest* possible age.
It's not "creepy" for a 60 year old to be dating someone who is almost 40. 60 with a 20 year old would be creepy.
What?! A 60 yo dating a 39 yo is definitely creepy!
Anonymous wrote:Anyone can get sick or infirm at any time. Go for it, OP. "Being the only 50 year old at a gathering of 70 year olds" is twenty years down the road, for heaven's sake, and the bulk of your time is not spent at gatherings. People on these boards relish other people's loss and misery, so ignore the naysayers.
Anonymous wrote:I know one couple. He was 50, twice divorced with two kids from different marriages, middle class. He was looking for a wife in a third world country. She was 25 with little prospect of getting married. She's attractive, tall and thin like model.
They have been married for under 10 years now. Had a kid. He's very controlling. Doesn't let her have friends, get a job or go to school. He didn't want her to learn to drive a car, he likes her to stay at home and tend to him. Very patriarchal style of family. He doesn't help her with the kid at all. Constantly demands servicing. She's anxious and feels very protected by him. He manipulates her by playing on her fears. Not a good dynamic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think men dating or marrying much younger women (15 years or so) fall into 2 categories: loser guys and wealthy guys. Of course, there is sometimes an overlap here.
100%
Yep totally agree!! 40 year old men with 20 year old women- we aren't jealous! Anytime I see a guy like that's I thank the universe for getting him out of my 40 year old dating pool. Ain't nobody got time for that! When I see never married 40 year old men with 30 year olds, all I can see is "ISSUES" flashing in neon lights over their heads. They need someone young to control, to make them feel like a man. Eventually the 20 year olds grow up and figure out who they are and dump the guys. Then they're 50 year olds chasing 30 year olds and the cycle continues. Thank you for getting this guy off the market, op!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think men dating or marrying much younger women (15 years or so) fall into 2 categories: loser guys and wealthy guys. Of course, there is sometimes an overlap here.
100%