Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think many of you guys are missing the a big point. NO ONE IS THE WRONGED PARTY!! A kid accidentally took another kids swim suit. A Target suit swim suit!
I'm sure the OP wishes now that she had just offered to pay for a new one and then replace the old one latter.
I disagree. The Mom is inconvenienced. And she's certainly wronged now that she's out the swimsuit that OP offered to drive to her.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think many of you guys are missing the a big point. NO ONE IS THE WRONGED PARTY!! A kid accidentally took another kids swim suit. A Target suit swim suit!
I'm sure the OP wishes now that she had just offered to pay for a new one and then replace the old one latter.
This shouting prompts me to ask WHO ONLY HAS ONE BATHING SUIT FOR THEIR KID?!!
Anonymous wrote:I think many of you guys are missing the a big point. NO ONE IS THE WRONGED PARTY!! A kid accidentally took another kids swim suit. A Target suit swim suit!
I'm sure the OP wishes now that she had just offered to pay for a new one and then replace the old one latter.
Anonymous wrote:You should have driven it to them. Your son took it, his mistake. It sucks but that is what you should have done.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She was inconvenienced because of your son's fault. That is the fact. It does not matter if you think that her inconvenience was small. That is your opinion.
You are feeling inconvenienced because you are supposed to fix your son's fault. That was your moral obligation. But you did not allow yourself to be inconvenienced to fix your son's fault. That is your selfishness and entitlement. You are not a good role model to your children in doing the right thing. Sorry, but I am not on your side. Even though I have sympathy for your situation.
Sometime doing the right thing is not easy, but not doing the right thing is wrong.
Following this logic, if the swimsuit snafu was not discovered until the family was in New Jersey it would be OP's moral obligation to drive the swimsuit to them there to "fix her son's fault." She would be selfish, entitled and a poor role model not to do so.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, I understand that the lady was crazy.
However, if it was me, I would have made sure that she gets it somehow. Even if I had to send my neighbor on Uber to drop it at her house or something. Mainly because it was my DS's fault. After that I would have never had any communication with that person because best to leave toxic people out of your life. This would be called taking the high road.
Agreed. Her unreasonable request should not outweigh taking responsibility for an unfortunate mistake.
You teach your kids to take responsibility for someone else's mistake?
Anonymous wrote:I think many of you guys are missing the a big point. NO ONE IS THE WRONGED PARTY!! A kid accidentally took another kids swim suit. A Target suit swim suit!
I'm sure the OP wishes now that she had just offered to pay for a new one and then replace the old one latter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She was inconvenienced because of your son's fault. That is the fact. It does not matter if you think that her inconvenience was small. That is your opinion.
You are feeling inconvenienced because you are supposed to fix your son's fault. That was your moral obligation. But you did not allow yourself to be inconvenienced to fix your son's fault. That is your selfishness and entitlement. You are not a good role model to your children in doing the right thing. Sorry, but I am not on your side. Even though I have sympathy for your situation.
Sometime doing the right thing is not easy, but not doing the right thing is wrong.
Thank you, thank you, thank you. Can't believe most of the posters are putting the obligation on the wronged party and NOT the OP. Unbelievable.
No way. A normal mom wouldn't have had unrealistic expectations of OP.