Anonymous wrote:Fed supervisor here. I tend to be very lenient and flexible as long as the work is getting done. As soon as the work slips or the quality is sacrificed, I crack the whip. Usually that doesn't happen.
If your employee is still submitting quality work on-time and not slacking, then I'd have no problem if she's home and occasionally has to tend to a sick child.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My thoughts:
I have a 6 year old. To me, age isn't as relevant to this as type of sickness. If it's a stomach thing, I'm not getting anything done, because my kid is barfing every 10 minutes or running to the bathroom thinking she will. Then I'm cleaning it up, getting her settled back, giving her liquids, etc. Could I get some work done? Sure. Would I be as productive as on a regular work day? No.
The main reason I think she is taking advantage, and why I think if you enforced the policy it would clearly become obvious she was, is because there's no reason she should be the one who stays home with the kid every single time. In a family where the parents have to take leave if their kid is sick and stay home with them, the parents would switch off. If she's staying home 7 times in 7 times of her kid getting "sick" it's because there's a benefit for her to do so. If it was an enforced policy of having to take her own sick leave or vacation day to do it, I think you'd quickly find she would be in the office with her husband taking the hit from time to time. Because she wouldn't want to lose her PTO every single time her kid got sick.
I would explain you've been understanding, but that 7 times in a month is excessive and she's going to need to either start switching off with her husband or using PTO because you can't set that precedent.
Did OP confirm that the teleworker isn't a single parent? Because this is a pretty awful assumption to make if you don't know.
She didn't but my guess is OP would not have nearly as big an issue with this as she does if she knew this was a struggling single mom trying to hold it all together herself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My thoughts:
I have a 6 year old. To me, age isn't as relevant to this as type of sickness. If it's a stomach thing, I'm not getting anything done, because my kid is barfing every 10 minutes or running to the bathroom thinking she will. Then I'm cleaning it up, getting her settled back, giving her liquids, etc. Could I get some work done? Sure. Would I be as productive as on a regular work day? No.
The main reason I think she is taking advantage, and why I think if you enforced the policy it would clearly become obvious she was, is because there's no reason she should be the one who stays home with the kid every single time. In a family where the parents have to take leave if their kid is sick and stay home with them, the parents would switch off. If she's staying home 7 times in 7 times of her kid getting "sick" it's because there's a benefit for her to do so. If it was an enforced policy of having to take her own sick leave or vacation day to do it, I think you'd quickly find she would be in the office with her husband taking the hit from time to time. Because she wouldn't want to lose her PTO every single time her kid got sick.
I would explain you've been understanding, but that 7 times in a month is excessive and she's going to need to either start switching off with her husband or using PTO because you can't set that precedent.
Did OP confirm that the teleworker isn't a single parent? Because this is a pretty awful assumption to make if you don't know.
Anonymous wrote:This is one of the reasons I'll never work for the government - rigid rules reign over common sense. Progressive companies have caught onto the fact that we are actually human beings when we're not in the office.
As the baby boomers keep getting older, more and more people need to take time off to be with their families. And people have always needed occasional time off to stay with sick kids. That's not going to change.
I work for a company that allows liberal teleworking - you can take it whether you are single or married, have kids or not. Whether it's a sick pet or a grandmother who needs someone with her once a week, as long as you get your work done and don't inconvenience the rest of the team, you are allowed to be a responsible adult.
I'm not saying that this particular employee is not in the wrong; she seems like she is taking advantage. But life is hard for a lot of people. The OP sounds like she is married with only one child, and doesn't understand the juggling that many of us have to do. What happens when she has two or three, or her husband leaves her? Balancing work with the rest of your life becomes much more difficult. I agree with PPs that the OP should ask her if something serious is going on in her life - maybe her child has cancer or a serious illness.
Anonymous wrote:My thoughts:
I have a 6 year old. To me, age isn't as relevant to this as type of sickness. If it's a stomach thing, I'm not getting anything done, because my kid is barfing every 10 minutes or running to the bathroom thinking she will. Then I'm cleaning it up, getting her settled back, giving her liquids, etc. Could I get some work done? Sure. Would I be as productive as on a regular work day? No.
The main reason I think she is taking advantage, and why I think if you enforced the policy it would clearly become obvious she was, is because there's no reason she should be the one who stays home with the kid every single time. In a family where the parents have to take leave if their kid is sick and stay home with them, the parents would switch off. If she's staying home 7 times in 7 times of her kid getting "sick" it's because there's a benefit for her to do so. If it was an enforced policy of having to take her own sick leave or vacation day to do it, I think you'd quickly find she would be in the office with her husband taking the hit from time to time. Because she wouldn't want to lose her PTO every single time her kid got sick.
I would explain you've been understanding, but that 7 times in a month is excessive and she's going to need to either start switching off with her husband or using PTO because you can't set that precedent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Others on team are watching.
Our GSE has devolved to people working at home and having infants crying on the conf calls in background . everyone knows and many do it.
So if you want others to do same thing do nothing
And if people think they can work with a sick 6 year old you must have nothing to do. There is no way I could do my job with a small child in the house and no one else watching.
I'm curious what your sick 6 year old is doing. Mine literally will watch tv/movies all day, and occasionally moan. What type of at-home job can't you do while your kid watches tv?
Sure if your dc has a fever and sleeps it is possible but when the kid is getting sick or getting better it is an all day affair. Wanting to go for walk. Play with toys. Chase dog. Eat lunch turn on tv. Turn off music. Read a book. Chase squirrels. Go to cousins play football. You name it. A 6 year old craves attention. Anyone that says they work while watching a 6 year old is lying
Either you don't have a six year old or you treat your six year old like a two year old and that needs to stop. Chase squirrels? WTF? If your kid is healthy enough to want to chase squirrels, why isn't he or she in school?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Others on team are watching.
Our GSE has devolved to people working at home and having infants crying on the conf calls in background . everyone knows and many do it.
So if you want others to do same thing do nothing
And if people think they can work with a sick 6 year old you must have nothing to do. There is no way I could do my job with a small child in the house and no one else watching.
I'm curious what your sick 6 year old is doing. Mine literally will watch tv/movies all day, and occasionally moan. What type of at-home job can't you do while your kid watches tv?
Sure if your dc has a fever and sleeps it is possible but when the kid is getting sick or getting better it is an all day affair. Wanting to go for walk. Play with toys. Chase dog. Eat lunch turn on tv. Turn off music. Read a book. Chase squirrels. Go to cousins play football. You name it. A 6 year old craves attention. Anyone that says they work while watching a 6 year old is lying
Either you don't have a six year old or you treat your six year old like a two year old and that needs to stop. Chase squirrels? WTF? If your kid is healthy enough to want to chase squirrels, why isn't he or she in school?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Others on team are watching.
Our GSE has devolved to people working at home and having infants crying on the conf calls in background . everyone knows and many do it.
So if you want others to do same thing do nothing
And if people think they can work with a sick 6 year old you must have nothing to do. There is no way I could do my job with a small child in the house and no one else watching.
I'm curious what your sick 6 year old is doing. Mine literally will watch tv/movies all day, and occasionally moan. What type of at-home job can't you do while your kid watches tv?
Sure if your dc has a fever and sleeps it is possible but when the kid is getting sick or getting better it is an all day affair. Wanting to go for walk. Play with toys. Chase dog. Eat lunch turn on tv. Turn off music. Read a book. Chase squirrels. Go to cousins play football. You name it. A 6 year old craves attention. Anyone that says they work while watching a 6 year old is lying
Anonymous wrote:If my 6 year old were really sick - like the flu - he would lay around and sleep all day or watch tv, and I could get work done. If he were just a bit under the weather, he would harass me constantly and I would get nothing done.