Anonymous wrote:Starting around 15 they start to look older, by 20-25 they look old IMO.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I usually don’t examine people’s faces for wrinkles, crow’s feet, sunspots, etc. but being overweight is aging. Many white women are fat, matronly and frumpy even in their 20s which makes them look at least ten yrs older than their actual age.
AA women carry their weight better or at least know how to dress and don’t look so frumpy even if they are overweight.
And many AA women do not carry their weight well at all and wear unflattering clothing, but nice try.
AA try even when they have too much booty and are thick probably because AA culture is more accepting of overweight women. Thick and too much junk is still sexy.
Overweight white women just give up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I usually don’t examine people’s faces for wrinkles, crow’s feet, sunspots, etc. but being overweight is aging. Many white women are fat, matronly and frumpy even in their 20s which makes them look at least ten yrs older than their actual age.
AA women carry their weight better or at least know how to dress and don’t look so frumpy even if they are overweight.
And many AA women do not carry their weight well at all and wear unflattering clothing, but nice try.
Anonymous wrote:I usually don’t examine people’s faces for wrinkles, crow’s feet, sunspots, etc. but being overweight is aging. Many white women are fat, matronly and frumpy even in their 20s which makes them look at least ten yrs older than their actual age.
AA women carry their weight better or at least know how to dress and don’t look so frumpy even if they are overweight.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This again?
How else will we get to hear from the fervent "all white women are hags" poster?
+1,000. I know, what is with all of these comments? Aging is not a matter of race, but of genetics, which vary widely even within a single race. I think that it is just a bunch of PC posters who want to pat themselves on the back for denigrating the appearances of white women and complimenting those of minority women. I've seen plenty of minority women of a certain age who don't look good and plenty of white women who do, and vice-versa. It really is a mixed bag and it does not follow along racial lines as much as some people here would like to think.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I usually don’t examine people’s faces for wrinkles, crow’s feet, sunspots, etc. but being overweight is aging. Many white women are fat, matronly and frumpy even in their 20s which makes them look at least ten yrs older than their actual age.
AA women carry their weight better or at least know how to dress and don’t look so frumpy even if they are overweight.
It's because dark skin in more flattering. Pale skin, especially pale fat skin, i isn't as attractive or thinning as darker skin.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I usually don’t examine people’s faces for wrinkles, crow’s feet, sunspots, etc. but being overweight is aging. Many white women are fat, matronly and frumpy even in their 20s which makes them look at least ten yrs older than their actual age.
AA women carry their weight better or at least know how to dress and don’t look so frumpy even if they are overweight.
It's because dark skin in more flattering. Pale skin, especially pale fat skin, i isn't as attractive or thinning as darker skin.
Anonymous wrote:I usually don’t examine people’s faces for wrinkles, crow’s feet, sunspots, etc. but being overweight is aging. Many white women are fat, matronly and frumpy even in their 20s which makes them look at least ten yrs older than their actual age.
AA women carry their weight better or at least know how to dress and don’t look so frumpy even if they are overweight.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This again?
How else will we get to hear from the fervent "all white women are hags" poster?