Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How many of you ladies grew out your hair before your wedding then cut it quite a bit shortly thereafter?
In any case, pretty much nobody cuts their hair short for their wedding. So the idea that it looks more attractive is b.s. When you want to look pretty, the hair gets long.
And I think that what you are saying is total B.S. I've had a short cut since I was 22. Long hair just does not look nice on me, at all. I had a short hair at my wedding (at 27), and let me assure you that I looked great. My husband absolutely adores my look and when I let it grow a bit longer than usual, he asks when I will have it cut again. He loves it when my neck is open and he really loves kissing my neck.
To say that ALL women look better with long hair and that ALL men prefer long hair is a rediculous and untrue oversimplification.
So you figure short hair on the wedding day is about 50/50 then?
I will concede that there are exceptions. But I still contend that, for most women, when beauty is the goal, they go for long (or at least longer) hair. There are other considerations that lead to the bob, but the short cut is a sign that looking good for her spouse is low on the priority list.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How many of you ladies grew out your hair before your wedding then cut it quite a bit shortly thereafter?
In any case, pretty much nobody cuts their hair short for their wedding. So the idea that it looks more attractive is b.s. When you want to look pretty, the hair gets long.
And I think that what you are saying is total B.S. I've had a short cut since I was 22. Long hair just does not look nice on me, at all. I had a short hair at my wedding (at 27), and let me assure you that I looked great. My husband absolutely adores my look and when I let it grow a bit longer than usual, he asks when I will have it cut again. He loves it when my neck is open and he really loves kissing my neck.
To say that ALL women look better with long hair and that ALL men prefer long hair is a rediculous and untrue oversimplification.
Anonymous wrote:How many of you ladies grew out your hair before your wedding then cut it quite a bit shortly thereafter?
In any case, pretty much nobody cuts their hair short for their wedding. So the idea that it looks more attractive is b.s. When you want to look pretty, the hair gets long.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Its no wonder so many of you are miserable in your marriages. Both of us have preferences about levels of fitness and personal grooming. Of course our decision is our own but we certainly are not dismissive of what each of finds attractive.
Good luck, many of you need it.
So your husband prefers you with a fuscia pixie cut, turquoise contact lenses, in thigh high boots and fishnets. He sees you in yoga pants and feels nauseated. No nightgowns either.
Are you accommodating him because it's what he finds attractive?
No woman should have to mitigate her own
Wow, a very intellectual arguement and poorly spelled. Way to go.
I do shave my pits. And my legs. And my undercarriage. I get my hair done regularly, and I have a drawer filled with sexy lingerie that I wear. But - I don't do it "for" my DH. I do it for me. I do it because I lovefeeling sexy and turning him on, I do it because he makes me feel sexy every day, regardless if I am in pajamas with a snotty cold, in yoga pants and a ponytail, or in candlelight wearing black lace with my hair tumbled all around. I am not there for his enjoyment. I am there to share in the enjoyment together.
The fact that so many on this board can't understand the difference just shows me why there seems to be so many unhappily sexless marriages out there. What makes a woman feel sexy is being happy in her own skin, at all times. Needing to play a part to meet her partner's exacting standards undermines that.
You sound insane and long winded. Do you jabber all this nonsense in your husband's ear as well?
If you're not actually going to add anything to the discussion other than hurl personal insults, why post at all? Do you gaslight your partner as well?
Here's how fruitful discussion goes:
Person 1: I believe X. Here is why.
Person 2: I dis/agree. I don't support x because.. Y is what I believe. Here is where I feel you X argument is flawed.
Person 1: interesting. I never considered it that way. I still think X is correct, but Y is certainly a consideration.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Its no wonder so many of you are miserable in your marriages. Both of us have preferences about levels of fitness and personal grooming. Of course our decision is our own but we certainly are not dismissive of what each of finds attractive.
Good luck, many of you need it.
So your husband prefers you with a fuscia pixie cut, turquoise contact lenses, in thigh high boots and fishnets. He sees you in yoga pants and feels nauseated. No nightgowns either.
Are you accommodating him because it's what he finds attractive?
No woman should have to mitigate her own happiness in her own skin to make her partner happy. A haircut or hair color doesnt define a person.
Sure, you can have a preference, but for me, this getting caught up in superficial trappings is really bizarre to me. So she cuts her hair short for a year? Two? Five? Does that define her differently as a short haired person? Is she less of a mother? Is her vagina less wonderful?
I'm sorry, this post is really confounding me because I really don't get it.
And as a post note - gentlemen, if you are so desperate for passionate and regular sex with your wives, DON'T put in their heads that you find them anything but irresistible. If you think that you suggesting a hairstyle isn't a big deal, trust me when I say many women will then worry about the other things you DONT say. So you don't like her hair - how do you feel about her stretch marks, saggy boobs, cellulite, the fact she didn't shave her legs for a week, the chin hair she's praying you didn't notice, her chapped lips, the spinach she had between her teeth on Tuesday.
Of course you are confounded. I bed you don't even shave your pits.
If not shaving your pits means a person is confounded, then that explains a lot about you.
Wow, a very intellectual arguement and poorly spelled. Way to go.
I do shave my pits. And my legs. And my undercarriage. I get my hair done regularly, and I have a drawer filled with sexy lingerie that I wear. But - I don't do it "for" my DH. I do it for me. I do it because I lovefeeling sexy and turning him on, I do it because he makes me feel sexy every day, regardless if I am in pajamas with a snotty cold, in yoga pants and a ponytail, or in candlelight wearing black lace with my hair tumbled all around. I am not there for his enjoyment. I am there to share in the enjoyment together.
The fact that so many on this board can't understand the difference just shows me why there seems to be so many unhappily sexless marriages out there. What makes a woman feel sexy is being happy in her own skin, at all times. Needing to play a part to meet her partner's exacting standards undermines that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Its no wonder so many of you are miserable in your marriages. Both of us have preferences about levels of fitness and personal grooming. Of course our decision is our own but we certainly are not dismissive of what each of finds attractive.
Good luck, many of you need it.
So your husband prefers you with a fuscia pixie cut, turquoise contact lenses, in thigh high boots and fishnets. He sees you in yoga pants and feels nauseated. No nightgowns either.
Are you accommodating him because it's what he finds attractive?
No woman should have to mitigate her own happiness in her own skin to make her partner happy. A haircut or hair color doesnt define a person.
Sure, you can have a preference, but for me, this getting caught up in superficial trappings is really bizarre to me. So she cuts her hair short for a year? Two? Five? Does that define her differently as a short haired person? Is she less of a mother? Is her vagina less wonderful?
I'm sorry, this post is really confounding me because I really don't get it.
And as a post note - gentlemen, if you are so desperate for passionate and regular sex with your wives, DON'T put in their heads that you find them anything but irresistible. If you think that you suggesting a hairstyle isn't a big deal, trust me when I say many women will then worry about the other things you DONT say. So you don't like her hair - how do you feel about her stretch marks, saggy boobs, cellulite, the fact she didn't shave her legs for a week, the chin hair she's praying you didn't notice, her chapped lips, the spinach she had between her teeth on Tuesday.
Of course you are confounded. I bed you don't even shave your pits.
If not shaving your pits means a person is confounded, then that explains a lot about you.
Anonymous wrote:[
Hm, no. After 35-40 very few woman have shiny, healthy looking hair. Hair, like skin, ages., no matter how well you care for it. Long old hairs is not pretty. Woman with long thining hair look pathetic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Its no wonder so many of you are miserable in your marriages. Both of us have preferences about levels of fitness and personal grooming. Of course our decision is our own but we certainly are not dismissive of what each of finds attractive.
Good luck, many of you need it.
So your husband prefers you with a fuscia pixie cut, turquoise contact lenses, in thigh high boots and fishnets. He sees you in yoga pants and feels nauseated. No nightgowns either.
Are you accommodating him because it's what he finds attractive?
No woman should have to mitigate her own happiness in her own skin to make her partner happy. A haircut or hair color doesnt define a person.
Sure, you can have a preference, but for me, this getting caught up in superficial trappings is really bizarre to me. So she cuts her hair short for a year? Two? Five? Does that define her differently as a short haired person? Is she less of a mother? Is her vagina less wonderful?
I'm sorry, this post is really confounding me because I really don't get it.
And as a post note - gentlemen, if you are so desperate for passionate and regular sex with your wives, DON'T put in their heads that you find them anything but irresistible. If you think that you suggesting a hairstyle isn't a big deal, trust me when I say many women will then worry about the other things you DONT say. So you don't like her hair - how do you feel about her stretch marks, saggy boobs, cellulite, the fact she didn't shave her legs for a week, the chin hair she's praying you didn't notice, her chapped lips, the spinach she had between her teeth on Tuesday.
Of course you are confounded. I bed you don't even shave your pits.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Its no wonder so many of you are miserable in your marriages. Both of us have preferences about levels of fitness and personal grooming. Of course our decision is our own but we certainly are not dismissive of what each of finds attractive.
Good luck, many of you need it.
So your husband prefers you with a fuscia pixie cut, turquoise contact lenses, in thigh high boots and fishnets. He sees you in yoga pants and feels nauseated. No nightgowns either.
Are you accommodating him because it's what he finds attractive?
No woman should have to mitigate her own happiness in her own skin to make her partner happy. A haircut or hair color doesnt define a person.
Sure, you can have a preference, but for me, this getting caught up in superficial trappings is really bizarre to me. So she cuts her hair short for a year? Two? Five? Does that define her differently as a short haired person? Is she less of a mother? Is her vagina less wonderful?
I'm sorry, this post is really confounding me because I really don't get it.
And as a post note - gentlemen, if you are so desperate for passionate and regular sex with your wives, DON'T put in their heads that you find them anything but irresistible. If you think that you suggesting a hairstyle isn't a big deal, trust me when I say many women will then worry about the other things you DONT say. So you don't like her hair - how do you feel about her stretch marks, saggy boobs, cellulite, the fact she didn't shave her legs for a week, the chin hair she's praying you didn't notice, her chapped lips, the spinach she had between her teeth on Tuesday.
Anonymous wrote:How many of you ladies grew out your hair before your wedding then cut it quite a bit shortly thereafter?
In any case, pretty much nobody cuts their hair short for their wedding. So the idea that it looks more attractive is b.s. When you want to look pretty, the hair gets long.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dcum wife on one thread -- I will wear my hair the way I want and dress how I want. It's my body and DH needs to accept it!!!!
Same wife on another thread -- DH NEVER plans a date night! He is so boring!
Lol, yup. Pretty much! Haha.
More like:
DCUM husband on one thread: my wife won't have sex with me. When she does, the lights have to be off and the conditions have to be perfect.
DCUM husband on another thread: I am going to get hung up on some superficial thing about my wife. Regardless of the fact it may make her feel sexy as hell, I am going to tell her I don't find it as sexy as what it is I specifically want.
Not more like, but also
NP. Nope, it's more like.
Nope
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Its no wonder so many of you are miserable in your marriages. Both of us have preferences about levels of fitness and personal grooming. Of course our decision is our own but we certainly are not dismissive of what each of finds attractive.
Good luck, many of you need it.
So your husband prefers you with a fuscia pixie cut, turquoise contact lenses, in thigh high boots and fishnets. He sees you in yoga pants and feels nauseated. No nightgowns either.
Are you accommodating him because it's what he finds attractive?
No woman should have to mitigate her own happiness in her own skin to make her partner happy. A haircut or hair color doesnt define a person.
Sure, you can have a preference, but for me, this getting caught up in superficial trappings is really bizarre to me. So she cuts her hair short for a year? Two? Five? Does that define her differently as a short haired person? Is she less of a mother? Is her vagina less wonderful?
I'm sorry, this post is really confounding me because I really don't get it.
And as a post note - gentlemen, if you are so desperate for passionate and regular sex with your wives, DON'T put in their heads that you find them anything but irresistible. If you think that you suggesting a hairstyle isn't a big deal, trust me when I say many women will then worry about the other things you DONT say. So you don't like her hair - how do you feel about her stretch marks, saggy boobs, cellulite, the fact she didn't shave her legs for a week, the chin hair she's praying you didn't notice, her chapped lips, the spinach she had between her teeth on Tuesday.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dcum wife on one thread -- I will wear my hair the way I want and dress how I want. It's my body and DH needs to accept it!!!!
Same wife on another thread -- DH NEVER plans a date night! He is so boring!
Lol, yup. Pretty much! Haha.
More like:
DCUM husband on one thread: my wife won't have sex with me. When she does, the lights have to be off and the conditions have to be perfect.
DCUM husband on another thread: I am going to get hung up on some superficial thing about my wife. Regardless of the fact it may make her feel sexy as hell, I am going to tell her I don't find it as sexy as what it is I specifically want.
Not more like, but also
NP. Nope, it's more like.