There is no reason why a one size fits all solution needs to be implemented. The county could eliminate centers in areas (such as the ones named above) where they are redundant, and continue using centers in lower SES areas.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our experience, minus 27 kids and SOL nonsense, has been good. No grueling homework, still time for sports every night, a quick family dinner at the table and playtime. We have an only and two full time parents, which helps. Still don't think AAP is particularly challenging.
It's not. Which is why there are so many kids in it and why so many more kids would be able to do it if it wasn't a "closed" program.
It is not a closed program. There are schools in parts of the county where the AAP curriculum is used in all classes.
But is it used in all schools, for all kids? No.
Welcome to the fidelity of implementation issue. This is not new, and is not limited to the AAP curriculum.
And FCPS is a big place where schools serve different populations. It may be that local ES principals have too much say on this sue. But what works in Vienna, McLean, Chantilly may not be appropriate in a low SES ES with a high ESOL population.
+1000
A one size fits all solution does not work well for a county the size of Fairfax.