Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
+1. Sounds soooooo awkward! Like you are socially inept, maybe Aspergerish.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Anonymous wrote:I don't see why drinks-only is a problem, as long as it's made clear in advance, and it's scheduled late enough to allow time for dinner. I think a casual get-together is perfectly fine for a first date.
If having a man feed you is a requirement, then you should probably make that clear instead of going out and being passive-aggressive about it.
Anonymous wrote:
Not to be a bitch but I would cancel on someone who did that. It's kind of a weasely, passive aggressive way of doing it. Red flag.
Anonymous wrote:
+1. Sounds soooooo awkward! Like you are socially inept, maybe Aspergerish.
Anonymous wrote:
ME: What time are you eating dinner?
HER: Uh, 7 pm?
ME: Great! See you at the bar at 8:30!
MikeL wrote:
If you - as a guy - don't want to do food, make the date for 5:00-5:30 or so.
MikeL wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm another woman who thinks if she was hungry she should have ordered food. If I was invited to go out for drinks at 7:30, I'd either eat before I showed up or say "Hey, I'm really hungry, I'm going to order some food."
Yes to this. The 7:30 time pretty much means there should be some food involved.
If you - as a guy - don't want to do food, make the date for 5:00-5:30 or so.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Please don't flame me, but I think there might be an age gap in the "right" answer here. I'm 42. And while I don't expect a man to buy me dinner on a blind date to prove his worth to me, I also have enough confidence in myself/boldness that after 15-20 min of chatting, if I were starving, I would have said "hey lets, order an app, I'm starving" and if he had objected, I would have politely excused myself to go eat by myself. But anyway, I really wanted to say to the OP.... if your friend is 32ish or under... I will tell you it's a very different world. I hear this all the time from my younger co-workers, both male and female. They do coffee only and drinks only as the normal first date protocol. Nobody wants to invest more time than necessary to see if there's anything clicking. If there's chemistry. It doesn't mean your date is cheap. Or uninterested. It's just what they do. And you commit to the drinks only thing upfront. Second date, if there is one, is more of a time investment. It's what the kids are doing now. You might not like it. You might not do it if you were out in the dating world. But it doesn't mean this guy was cheap or didn't like her.
I'm 50 and I totally get the whole drinks/coffee thing and would not expect a meal. I've been with my husband for over 20 years but I dated A LOT back in the day. This is not that new!
Anonymous wrote:I think just drinks or even just coffee is fine for the first date. As in general, men still carry most of the financial burden for dating (please see posts above for proof of this), it could get awfully expensive for them to shell out hundreds of dollars on first dates that never get any further.
I'm surprised it wasn't clear when the date was arranged, that it was just for drinks? Any date I've been on, it was basically clear Ie. "Why don't we meet for a drink on Thursday night?".
If she was starving, she has a tongue and is an adult, I assume, and could have ordered an app herself. I do find it weird that it wasnt offered as part of the date (because sharing a little food is a great tension breaker), but maybe he wasn't hungry aside from the bread. Maybe drinks was only an hour of time and he didn't think food was necessary.
Friend can speak up and not play games like "appearing" ravenous and hoping date will order food.
Oh, and before I get accused of being MRA or something, I'm a female. And if I'm hungry, I order and pay for my own food.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Very interesting thread. I've been out of the game forever but still seems the guy is expected to foot the bill. I know a few posters qualified with "if he asked her out." How common is it for the woman to do the asking?
As often as it snows in hell.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My newly separated friend went on a date with a guy at 7:30pm. They met at the bar of a restaurant. Both my friend and her date were obviously hungry as they finished all the bread on the table. Date did not offer any food. Friend went home starving. It's been a while since I've been married for 10 years but most of my dates were for dinner or we'd meet up at a bar/club but it was after dinner time and usually with other people.
Is this guy just not into my friend? Cheap? Poor? Or is this normal to have just drinks?
I think it is fine to go out for drinks but if you meet at 7:30 and clearly both people are hungry, shouldn't you just order food?
Tell your newly separated friend she can order the god damn food if she's hungry. Nothing is stopping her from doing this, other than the preconceived notion that women entitled to a dating gravy train where men pay for everything.
This is why I say to women when setting up dates:
ME: What time are you eating dinner?
HER: Uh, 7 pm?
ME: Great! See you at the bar at 8:30!
Not to be a bitch but I would cancel on someone who did that. It's kind of a weasely, passive aggressive way of doing it. Red flag.
+1. Sounds soooooo awkward! Like you are socially inept, maybe Aspergerish.