Anonymous wrote:You could be at a great school but your kid could be in a class where the personality mix is a little toxic. The wonderful thing about DC is that you have school choice so you're not stuck with one option. Good luck to you!
True enough, but I don't find it wonderful, honestly. School choice also means uprooting your kid whenever something doesn't work... which I don't think is always the right thing to do. I would have rather stayed and worked things out. But administrators and teachers can only do so much. And sometimes the Mocha Mamas might as well be the Larchmont Junior League, for all of their inclusiveness and tolerance. (As seen by the other poster.)
Sorry, still sensitive on this topic, probably more than I should be.
, but absolutely worth it in the end. Kids are hardier than you think. Our final move was made mid-September with the oldest kicking and screaming. After the first month she never looked back. It did however, take another year to get a "thank you" out of her
.You could be at a great school but your kid could be in a class where the personality mix is a little toxic. The wonderful thing about DC is that you have school choice so you're not stuck with one option. Good luck to you!
Anonymous wrote:My child, like all children, has moments, but no--in this case, I don't think it was my child's issue. The previous school we attended for several years in another state has surface demographics similar to Shepherd. No issue there. The day camp my child attends this summer has the same demographics--again, no issues. Maybe we were just unlucky. Maybe it's the age where a few mean kids can really impact everything. I don't know. I've agonized over this a great deal, but finally concluded--whatever happened (and it's very hard to know for sure, as a great deal of it was unwitnessed by any adults), it's not a problem when we aren't at Shepherd.
I did bring up concerns with Ms. MIles and the teachers. I thought everyone was amazingly responsive. If my child could have the same teacher next year, if ms miles was staying.... those are things that might have made us stay. However, going into this again with an unknown principal, and a completely unresponsive parent cohort (I did attempt to work things out with the parents of the other children--responses varied from none to accusing my child of being the problem--and thanks, again, other Shepherd parent for reminding me of how great it is to hear that again....) -- we've decided to cut our losses and find a better fit.
I continue to think Shepherd is a fantastic school. But our experience was not fantastic. And again, not an ses thing. If anything, the opposite.
Anonymous wrote:Maybe your child was the difficult one. Students are so resilient and their issues are really adult driven. As for the AA community being affluent is so subjective because the riches and or the wealth can be viewed in so many different ways. I have seen elaborate play dates, birthday parties and other familiar type activites. Such as Mocha Moms, Jack and Jill, Black Sororities Debutantes and other social-activities geared to AA families. They were attended by many who salaries ranged from barely affordable to affluent and as they say in the community the struggle is real and it ain't always the money. Just ask 50-cent LOL!!! #bankruptcy
Anonymous wrote:Maybe your child was the difficult one. Students are so resilient and their issues are really adult driven. As for the AA community being affluent is so subjective because the riches and or the wealth can be viewed in so many different ways. I have seen elaborate play dates, birthday parties and other familiar type activites. Such as Mocha Moms, Jack and Jill, Black Sororities Debutantes and other social-activities geared to AA families. They were attended by many who salaries ranged from barely affordable to affluent and as they say in the community the struggle is real and it ain't always the money. Just ask 50-cent LOL!!! #bankruptcy
) and who have high(er) achieving children send their kids. As you noted, college educated folk can have salaries that cover a very wide range so income shouldn't be the primary determining factor here, at least in my opinion. Besides, as previously noted, most AA's in DC with real wealth (and certainly those with some degree of power) do not send their kids to public schools.Anonymous wrote:I felt like my kid was exposed to a lot of negativity at Shepherd last year--not in a poor kids vs rich kids way--more like, it is a socially conservative school, and kids who are different seem to be teased for it.
That may be due to its demographics, or not. I just know that as welcoming as everyone was to our family (and they were), my kid had a lot of trouble with the other children.
Anonymous wrote:I felt like my kid was exposed to a lot of negativity at Shepherd last year--not in a poor kids vs rich kids way--more like, it is a socially conservative school, and kids who are different seem to be teased for it.
That may be due to its demographics, or not. I just know that as welcoming as everyone was to our family (and they were), my kid had a lot of trouble with the other children.