Anonymous wrote:It's been proven that white and Asian college applicants currently need SAT scores at least 250 and 450 points higher than AA applicants respectively to achieve similar admissions outcomes.
I conclude that my half white-half Asian family can't afford to mess around in any of these so-so DC pubilc high schools, other than maybe Walls and the BASIS juvenile detention facility. We're not IB for Wilson.
Anonymous wrote:Not buying that expensive test prep is the key to success, or that any DC public school is producing students with 8 Ivy League acceptances. Such stories make the front pages of newspapers of national record. And I've heard more than enough excuses for Banneker's unimpressive scores.
I grew up in a low-income family (qualifying for free lunch through MS, though my proud immigrant parents wouldn't accept the food). We couldn't afford SAT prep classes and I worked in the family business from grade school, yet was a PSAT National Merit Scholarship Semifinalist in NY, a state with one of the country's highest PSAT cut-off scores. My younger sister was also a semifinalist, and as was my lower middle-class spouse and her brother.
What I had that the Banneker and Eastern kids lack were mostly high SES white and Asian classmates. Frequent visits to their homes taught me how mainstream upper middle-class Americans live - with reliable cars, backyard pools, and trips to Disneyland and the Grand Canyon. I wanted in and asked classmates' professional parents how to get there.
DCPS, please end apartheid education on Capitol Hill past elementary school and Stuart-Hobson. Find a way to integrate Eastern in five years or less. The half-baked IB Diploma Program pretty clearly isn't going to do it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any school with average SATs as low as Banneker's by default cannot be academically rigorous.
Do you understand how averages are calculated?
Anonymous wrote:^^^^
The only thing outdated in your post is your nephew's approach to test prep. The SAT book is what I used when I graduated in the 80's. Today most kids benefit from test prep classes, like the ones offered at expensive learning centers. This is what I did for lay 2 DC--and what a lot of parents are doing to give their kids a leg up.
Furthermore, your response ignores the fact that many Banneker students are dealing with situations and traumas that don't allow them the extra prep. No Khan Academy videos if you don't have a computer or Internet access. No time to use internet on library if you're working after school. What if you don't know where you'll be sleeping after school from one day to the next? Don't underestimate the challenges some of those kids face.
PS
I'm more impressed with the fact that Banneker boasted of 2 graduates with acceptance into all 8 Ivy leagues last year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The average of a test in school should still be above the national average. They should do better to serve those students.
Perhaps the students are being served well, but the SAT is a different kind of beast. For everybody. Absent the test prep that many suburban kids can afford, they may be doing okay and would be as competitive on the test if their parents could afford prep instead of housing them in homeless shelters after school where they're needed to babysit.
The kids at Banneker face the same traumas and issues as other DC kids. They're just more motivated to do well.
Anonymous wrote:The average of a test in school should still be above the national average. They should do better to serve those students.