Anonymous wrote:Really? Pretty sure if I polled those who send personal texts or pics, it's presumed private. Especially cunt pics.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who cares if you can sue? If you don't want your picture distributed, don't send it out. Period. Anyone who has dated in the past ten years knows this is a possibility and protects themselves accordingly. Or not.
I haven't dated in the past 10 years but I think that's good advice.
Go ahead and grab your burka. Great advice, but unrealistic. Most of us dating sext and assume privacy. Welcome to 2015.
You assume privacy with your non-exclusive f-buddy? Good luck with that.
Yes, I would assume some level of privacy. If I go to a party and use the bathroom I assume that there are no hidden cameras filming me. If I go to bed with a guy I assume that he is not videotaping what we're doing without my knowledge and consent. I think that most people would agree that those assumptions are both quite reasonable.
We are talking about sending selfies, not being secretly taped.
Yes. I was just pointing out that we can and do - ALL of us - assume a certain level of privacy in various situations. However, taking a nude selfie and sending it to a guy that I'm having a casual thing with....no. I don't think I can ASSume that he won't show that pic to someone else.
Agreed.
Anonymous wrote:But that does not mean that the guy is not a jerk for sharing the pic w/o asking me first.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who cares if you can sue? If you don't want your picture distributed, don't send it out. Period. Anyone who has dated in the past ten years knows this is a possibility and protects themselves accordingly. Or not.
I haven't dated in the past 10 years but I think that's good advice.
Go ahead and grab your burka. Great advice, but unrealistic. Most of us dating sext and assume privacy. Welcome to 2015.
You assume privacy with your non-exclusive f-buddy? Good luck with that.
Yes, I would assume some level of privacy. If I go to a party and use the bathroom I assume that there are no hidden cameras filming me. If I go to bed with a guy I assume that he is not videotaping what we're doing without my knowledge and consent. I think that most people would agree that those assumptions are both quite reasonable.
We are talking about sending selfies, not being secretly taped.
Yes. I was just pointing out that we can and do - ALL of us - assume a certain level of privacy in various situations. However, taking a nude selfie and sending it to a guy that I'm having a casual thing with....no. I don't think I can ASSume that he won't show that pic to someone else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who cares if you can sue? If you don't want your picture distributed, don't send it out. Period. Anyone who has dated in the past ten years knows this is a possibility and protects themselves accordingly. Or not.
I haven't dated in the past 10 years but I think that's good advice.
Go ahead and grab your burka. Great advice, but unrealistic. Most of us dating sext and assume privacy. Welcome to 2015.
You assume privacy with your non-exclusive f-buddy? Good luck with that.
Yes, I would assume some level of privacy. If I go to a party and use the bathroom I assume that there are no hidden cameras filming me. If I go to bed with a guy I assume that he is not videotaping what we're doing without my knowledge and consent. I think that most people would agree that those assumptions are both quite reasonable.
We are talking about sending selfies, not being secretly taped.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who cares if you can sue? If you don't want your picture distributed, don't send it out. Period. Anyone who has dated in the past ten years knows this is a possibility and protects themselves accordingly. Or not.
I haven't dated in the past 10 years but I think that's good advice.
Go ahead and grab your burka. Great advice, but unrealistic. Most of us dating sext and assume privacy. Welcome to 2015.
You assume privacy with your non-exclusive f-buddy? Good luck with that.
Yes, I would assume some level of privacy. If I go to a party and use the bathroom I assume that there are no hidden cameras filming me. If I go to bed with a guy I assume that he is not videotaping what we're doing without my knowledge and consent. I think that most people would agree that those assumptions are both quite reasonable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who cares if you can sue? If you don't want your picture distributed, don't send it out. Period. Anyone who has dated in the past ten years knows this is a possibility and protects themselves accordingly. Or not.
I haven't dated in the past 10 years but I think that's good advice.
Go ahead and grab your burka. Great advice, but unrealistic. Most of us dating sext and assume privacy. Welcome to 2015.
You assume privacy with your non-exclusive f-buddy? Good luck with that.
Anonymous wrote:I am a happily married woman in my 40s and one of my besties is back in the dating game after a divorce.
Men she is dating will send her their "c**k" pics, and she will send it to me asking "what do you think?"
I will then make some suitably inappropriate remark and we will laugh about it.
I do not find OP's husband sketchy in anyway. He is not trying to hide anything, nor he is the one who is getting these pics sent to him by females.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who cares if you can sue? If you don't want your picture distributed, don't send it out. Period. Anyone who has dated in the past ten years knows this is a possibility and protects themselves accordingly. Or not.
I haven't dated in the past 10 years but I think that's good advice.
Go ahead and grab your burka. Great advice, but unrealistic. Most of us dating sext and assume privacy. Welcome to 2015.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who cares if you can sue? If you don't want your picture distributed, don't send it out. Period. Anyone who has dated in the past ten years knows this is a possibility and protects themselves accordingly. Or not.
I haven't dated in the past 10 years but I think that's good advice.
Go ahead and grab your burka. Great advice, but unrealistic. Most of us dating sext and assume privacy. Welcome to 2015.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who cares if you can sue? If you don't want your picture distributed, don't send it out. Period. Anyone who has dated in the past ten years knows this is a possibility and protects themselves accordingly. Or not.
I haven't dated in the past 10 years but I think that's good advice.
Go ahead and grab your burka. Great advice, but unrealistic. Most of us dating sext and assume privacy. Welcome to 2015.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who cares if you can sue? If you don't want your picture distributed, don't send it out. Period. Anyone who has dated in the past ten years knows this is a possibility and protects themselves accordingly. Or not.
I haven't dated in the past 10 years but I think that's good advice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Copyright and breach of privacy come to mind.
I'll add it's kind of similar to leaving you a private voicemail or sending you a private written letter. My intent wasn't for China to hear/see it.
So if I send Aunt Bea a picture of my son in his baseball uniform and Aunt Bea forwards it to her friend and says - "Look how cute Zach is!" - I could sue Aunt Bea for Copyright and breach of privacy? Really?
Or does this Copyright/Breach of privacy just apply when Sexy Suzie sends Hot Howie a nude selfie and Hot Howie forwards the selfie to impress his wingman Dumb Dave?
You can pretty much sue for anything. To actually prevail you would have to prove damages. Obviously, it would be much harder for you to prove damages from
Zach, and Sexy Suzie would have a much easier time proving damages (lost her job, can't find job as direct consequence of Hot Howie forwarding pics etc...)
Suppose Hot Howie only forwarded the pics to Beavis and Butthead and Dumb Dave who will just gawk at them and tell Howie to send more. Maybe Howie also showed a few mutual friends who also knew Suzie socially but had no business dealings with her at all. Suzie would be mortified to know that these people had been gawking at her, but beyond embarrassment/humiliation...what are her damages?
This can go back and forth with endless possibilities to whatever scenario you pitch. Maybe Suzie is now clinically depressed, and has hefty therapy bills not covered by insurance. She's so mortified she can't go to work, and loses her home.