Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Do you hear yourself? You are depressed at the idea that marriage assumes a healthy sex life? Maybe you are right. You are depressed. Get help.
Do you hear yourself? "F@#k your feelings and the fact that I can't get you aroused. F@#k me anyway, because that's obviously YOUR problem, abnormal one. "
Oh, ok there's your problem. You need to be in charge of your own happiness. Touch yourself, tell him what you want, show him what you want, have a glass of wine, buy toys, own it. You can't use the excuse that it is his responsibility to get you aroused. You are an adult. Act like it.
+1
1. It's a problem. (Unless it's not - if your spouse is also uninterested in sex, then ignore all of this, you guys should be delighted to find someone compatible.)
2. The problem needs to be addressed.
3. It's atypical to not be aroused. It's not morally "bad" or anything. Just not the way human bodies and minds normally work.
4. When looking at ways to solve a problem, it's more reasonable to look to make the atypical typical to solve the problem instead of looking to make the typical atypical. In other words, the person without a sex drive is probably the one who is going to be expected to change more.
5. At the end of the day, you'll have to see if you can both change enough to reasonably accommodate the other and if you can live with the result. If not, then there shouldn't be any shame in splitting up.
The asexual spouse isn't bad, just different and potentially incompatible with the sexual spouse. Just importantly, the sexual spouse isn't frivolous to want a sexual relationship and shouldn't be made to feel that he or she is being selfish or that his or her needs are unimportant. That said, sometimes sex just isn't going to be possible in the marriage, and the partners will have to weigh the pros and cons of some unpleasant options at that point.