Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It sounds like the neighborhood school folks are sipping on the Kool-aid too. Trendy folks love to call other people trendy.
As one of the neighborhood school folks, I am confused about this. I was very upfront that my choice was driven by convenience. If my neighborhood school was immersion, I would have embraced immersion. Choosing convenience may be trendy, but I suspect it is an enduring trend.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It sounds like the neighborhood school folks are sipping on the Kool-aid too. Trendy folks love to call other people trendy.
As one of the neighborhood school folks, I am confused about this. I was very upfront that my choice was driven by convenience. If my neighborhood school was immersion, I would have embraced immersion. Choosing convenience may be trendy, but I suspect it is an enduring trend.
Anonymous wrote:It sounds like the neighborhood school folks are sipping on the Kool-aid too. Trendy folks love to call other people trendy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think people pick immersion because they like the idea of being able to say, "My kid speaks two languages!" It makes their kids sound smarter than your kid.
I have yet to meet an immersion kid (from monolingual family) that actually speaks another language. Sure they can say many words and a few sentences but they aren't really fluent. When I look at the scores (specifically advanced and at LAMB and YY) I don't see kids excelling in the basics. My fear is that the language exposure is actually limiting them. I'm even looking at white only (aka non FARM) and not impressed. So I don't think you can get STEM at immersion (at least not in DC). And yes I have seen the studies (no need for links).
You realize you are talking about STEM for elementary school. My DC who is really good at math is happy at Yu Ying and we don't feel the need to push or accelerate math in 2nd grade. My brother was a math prodigy who skipped high school to attend Johns Hopkins. We are also happy with his progress in English and Mandarin both of which he tests above grade level although he has a tutor for Mandarin. It's elementary school, they learn to read and write.
Good your boy is above level. He's the exception not the norm. Only 8% of YY testers are testing advanced in reading. [/quote
Shrug. DS would be testing above grade level in English no matter which school, immersion or not, we sent him. At least at Yu Ying, he's learning Mandarin and the curriculum challenges him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry there's such an "us vs. them" attitude about immersion. Totally unnecessary. I'm bullish on it, but that's just me. No judgment to others who chose something else for their kids. I think the kids without the immersion will be just fine. Let's pick something else to fight about. The energy here put towards better school options would do so much good.
Best post in this thread. The way OP asked the original question did have a judgemental flavor to it, but in the end it's great that parents on both sides of the "prioritize immersion / do not prioritize immersion" feel good about their choices. It's not a competition, but so many are making it sound like one. In the end this energy really would be better spent on improving schools instead of a passing contest about types of schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have yet to meet an immersion kid (from monolingual family) that actually speaks another language.
When I look at the scores (specifically advanced and at LAMB and YY) I don't see kids excelling in the basics.
Stop by Oyster when you have a chance, you'll disabuse yourself from both of those notions.
Oyster is impossible to get into if you are monolingual and OOB.
And somehow that fact negates the fact that they do both immersion and the basics well? Riiiiiiight...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If my kids are destined to speak only one language, I am sure grateful it happens to be English.
Agreed!
Having said that, unless your kids are donkeys, you surely don't believe they are destined to speak only one language, correct?
Anonymous wrote:If my kids are destined to speak only one language, I am sure grateful it happens to be English.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are at an immersion charter but supplement with a math tutor and private instrument instruction each week. I feel like I can supplement where the school could be stronger, but I can't creat immersion at home.
If you couldn't afford the tutor, what type of program would you choose?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think people pick immersion because they like the idea of being able to say, "My kid speaks two languages!" It makes their kids sound smarter than your kid.
Do people think that? My maid speaks 2 languages and didn't graduate high school my FIL has 2 PHDs and is monolingual.
I always think this in my head when I see the "monolingual is the new stupid" mantra reposted on DCUM by the kook-aid drinkers.
The guy who cuts my grass in 96 degree weather is also bilingual.
Anonymous wrote:To the person, asking literally "how could you?", there are other ways than immersion to become fluent in multiple languages. I'm not convinced that immersion is necessarily the best way, surely not for everyone. Immersion isn't a magic wand that you can wave over your child's head to give her/him "the gift". Language development is more complex than that. For example, I speak and write four languages pretty fluently and wrote my Ph.D. in a foreign language. But was never in an immersion school. I learned them as second languages in school, starting in middle school. I traveled with my parents for vacation and did an exchange year in high school as well as in college.