Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We got into RCF and have no other kids in school, so it wasn't through a sibling spot.
No one is saying that all the spots are given to siblings. That would highly unlikely, it's the issue of lottery seats being given to siblings. I am merely making a case for what many see as an unfair sibling policy.
Actually someone did say that a page or two earlier in the thread, or at least said they had heard it. I personally think the sibling thing is appropriate. Maybe not fair, but appropriate. There are pros to keeping families in the same school and I think it would be crappier for a younger sub not to go to the same program as his/her older sib than it would be for someone who applied not to get a spot. So anyway, people are posting non-sib spots to assure those earlier posters that siblings are not taking every spot. Really what we need is more classes added to the programs - let's unite and push for that rather than pushing for eliminating the sibling policy - in the classes I know in immersion, there are a only a handful of siblings in each class. It's really not as big a problem as you might you think it is.
Heard that in some cases they may be filling the entire or most of the K class with siblings. Does anyone know if this is true?
[\quote]
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We got into RCF and have no other kids in school, so it wasn't through a sibling spot.
No one is saying that all the spots are given to siblings. That would highly unlikely, it's the issue of lottery seats being given to siblings. I am merely making a case for what many see as an unfair sibling policy.
Anonymous wrote:We got into RCF and have no other kids in school, so it wasn't through a sibling spot.