Anonymous wrote:Nothing is more misogynistic than one woman judging another woman. "just a waitress"' really? MYOB and work on your personality. Mayhap then a man will take an interest in you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When I was in law school, many of the men in my class were very open about the fact that they were not the least bit interested in dating women who were fellow law students. I was already engaged at the time so it didn't affect me, but I thought it was weird.
They were smart.
I'm married to a lawyer. I can't imagine trying to have a family and give your children the attention they deserve with two lawyers as parents. The hours are brutal and not compatible with a balanced home life.
Anonymous wrote:
I hope parents like you understand that your children are separate from you and certainly get to have their own lives outside of your preferences. Being a nanny is a honorable vocation, one often held by people who were teachers and have multiple degrees. All professions that serve society in some way are equally honorable. There's no intelligence difference between the barista and the doctor- in many cases, the barista is studying and paying for degrees. Intelligence is spread over all demographics and class is innate, not the product of money. Your classism is as sad as racism . What will you do if one of your children wants to become an artist? Is gay? Falls in love with a fishmonger? Decides to become a chef or go to another country and do charity work? Will you teach your children that certain vocations are substandard? How will this affect how they treat others?
The most critical thing children need to acquire is empathy, kindness, and a love of nature and the arts. All else follows.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
So, a barista couldn't possibly be highly intelligent, educated and classy. This is classic entitled classism at its finest.
You know what, PP? I'm a extraordinary intelligent, classy lady that's quite capable of raising amazing children. I switched careers when I became older to something less "sophisticated" to allow my mind to relax at work, so I have plenty of mental energy for my art. We don't all fit the same mold. I certainly hope that you do not have a nanny, since you'd surely look down a her, even tho many nannies have degrees.
She could be. Statistically, she is less likely to be all these things. This is not personal to you.
If you switched careers to something less sophisticated when you became older, you couldn't possibly be a fun, sweet, young thing the PP had in mind. Your education would be..er...in the way.
I have no problems with nannies but my DH wouldn't have married one, and I don't want my son to marry one or my daughter to become one, either.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
So, a barista couldn't possibly be highly intelligent, educated and classy. This is classic entitled classism at its finest.
You know what, PP? I'm a extraordinary intelligent, classy lady that's quite capable of raising amazing children. I switched careers when I became older to something less "sophisticated" to allow my mind to relax at work, so I have plenty of mental energy for my art. We don't all fit the same mold. I certainly hope that you do not have a nanny, since you'd surely look down a her, even tho many nannies have degrees.
She could be. Statistically, she is less likely to be all these things. This is not personal to you.
If you switched careers to something less sophisticated when you became older, you couldn't possibly be a fun, sweet, young thing the PP had in mind. Your education would be..er...in the way.
I have no problems with nannies but my DH wouldn't have married one, and I don't want my son to marry one or my daughter to become one, either.
It is entirely possible to be an educated 'fun, sweet young thing'. Lots of us manage that quite well. Our education is a plus, but don't downplay the importance of fun and sweet in a life partner. Men certainly don't...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are missing the nuance here PP. Everyone understands men value physical beauty and attraction. We are discussing whether or not some men also value dominance and seek out hot helpless women.
Two hot twins. One is helpless, the other is dominant. Who do you court?
Helpless = annoying
Dominant = threatening, and possibly also annoying
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are missing the nuance here PP. Everyone understands men value physical beauty and attraction. We are discussing whether or not some men also value dominance and seek out hot helpless women.
Two hot twins. One is helpless, the other is dominant. Who do you court?
Totally depends on the guy. Most guys like someone in between -- not ball busting but not completely dependent Some guys really like dominant women. Some guys really like dependent women
It's a matter of the guy's personality and taste. I'm an attorney and widely described as "a strong personality." I've had no shortage of men begging to date me. Some of them were very strong personalities who wanted a partner who wouldn't be overwhelmed by them. Some were more passive men who wanted a partner who would take the lead and run the relationship and their lives.
If OP can't find a date, she needs to look at herself not at men.
Passive men begged to date you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
So, a barista couldn't possibly be highly intelligent, educated and classy. This is classic entitled classism at its finest.
You know what, PP? I'm a extraordinary intelligent, classy lady that's quite capable of raising amazing children. I switched careers when I became older to something less "sophisticated" to allow my mind to relax at work, so I have plenty of mental energy for my art. We don't all fit the same mold. I certainly hope that you do not have a nanny, since you'd surely look down a her, even tho many nannies have degrees.
She could be. Statistically, she is less likely to be all these things. This is not personal to you.
If you switched careers to something less sophisticated when you became older, you couldn't possibly be a fun, sweet, young thing the PP had in mind. Your education would be..er...in the way.
I have no problems with nannies but my DH wouldn't have married one, and I don't want my son to marry one or my daughter to become one, either.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
So, a barista couldn't possibly be highly intelligent, educated and classy. This is classic entitled classism at its finest.
You know what, PP? I'm a extraordinary intelligent, classy lady that's quite capable of raising amazing children. I switched careers when I became older to something less "sophisticated" to allow my mind to relax at work, so I have plenty of mental energy for my art. We don't all fit the same mold. I certainly hope that you do not have a nanny, since you'd surely look down a her, even tho many nannies have degrees.
She could be. Statistically, she is less likely to be all these things. This is not personal to you.
If you switched careers to something less sophisticated when you became older, you couldn't possibly be a fun, sweet, young thing the PP had in mind. Your education would be..er...in the way.
I have no problems with nannies but my DH wouldn't have married one, and I don't want my son to marry one or my daughter to become one, either.