Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is 14:52. We can walk to CHML and it would be a short drive to 2R Young.
Very different approaches. Montessori is a very specific animal and even more so in higher grades. Probably makes a big difference how long you intend to stay in DC and the DC school system as both schools are equivalent of hitting lottery numbers. If you intend to stay past 1st or 2nd are you ok with Montessori in upper grades? Both are in final locations and have decent physical facilities so that;s probably a a wash. If you haven't done so you should go to a visit in Logan and watch a class. I bet if you do you will have a strong opinion one way or the other.
Thanks and we do plan to stay in the city, so we would want to stay at either school until middle, although who knows what could change between now and then. I know a bit about Montessori and really love it, but worry that it won't give strong enough academics in elementary. I do really love how they work, the materials in the classroom, ect and felt like in comparison, 2 Rivers works in larger groups and at desks much more, which I do not love. Of course, this is just from observation during an open house, so its hard to really know. I feel like 2 Rivers would probably be a better academic prep for middle and high school and may be more organized than CHML. I'm just not sure.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Current ITS family matched with Hearst....what to do?!
HEARST
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bridges vs. Bancroft
bridges
I'd go with Bancroft. Deal/Wilson feeder + dual language. Only exception would be if kid has special needs (since Bridges is so good at that) or would struggle learning a second language, or if the commute to Bridges was so much better that everyone would be much happier.
+1 to Bancroft for ^ reasons above.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bridges vs. Bancroft
bridges
I'd go with Bancroft. Deal/Wilson feeder + dual language. Only exception would be if kid has special needs (since Bridges is so good at that) or would struggle learning a second language, or if the commute to Bridges was so much better that everyone would be much happier.
Anonymous wrote:We had the same choice last year and went with CMI. We love the curriculum, the small class size,the teachers and the families. The middle school charter should be approved so you won't have to lottery again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is 14:52. We can walk to CHML and it would be a short drive to 2R Young.
Very different approaches. Montessori is a very specific animal and even more so in higher grades. Probably makes a big difference how long you intend to stay in DC and the DC school system as both schools are equivalent of hitting lottery numbers. If you intend to stay past 1st or 2nd are you ok with Montessori in upper grades? Both are in final locations and have decent physical facilities so that;s probably a a wash. If you haven't done so you should go to a visit in Logan and watch a class. I bet if you do you will have a strong opinion one way or the other.
Anonymous wrote:This is 14:52. We can walk to CHML and it would be a short drive to 2R Young.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ITS or Bethune (PK3)...language is important, but most important is a school that will foster a desire to learn. We have most likely already decided, but curious to hear others thoughts.
If Language is important then I would pick Bethune over ITS. We are at ITS and while they have a Spanish teacher and go once a week it's not enough.
Before you choose Bethune for Spanish, though, I'd read the 10-year charter review report: http://www.dcpcsb.org/sites/default/files/MM%20Bethune%20Review%20Report.pdf
Regarding that report, have you read similar from the other dual language charters? I'm curious which, if any, do have a good method of determining proficiency and how are they meeting goals?
Anonymous wrote:Capitol Hill Montessori or 2R Young for PS?