Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think people who are fixated on the reputation of the big three are out of step -- a couple of decades ago you could say there were just a couple of tippy-top schools, but given objective criteria -- college placement, rigor of curriculum, quality of students -- you have to say there are more top schools today. Ignoring this would be like saying the only top colleges are in the Ivy League. Potomac is one of the top area schools, it is up to you if you want to be obsessed about the name. Colleges know it is good, isn't that enough?
Potomac is NOT as good a school as STA, NCS, Sidwell, Maret or arguably some others. Potomac does not have the same level of academic rigor, as high a number of NMSF/NMF, or as good a record of getting its graduates into the most competitive colleges. Potomac is in a suburban neighborhood and while it has an attractive campus, it is nothing particularly special. It has a mostly white and preppy student body and is frankly, rather bland. It is more akin to a high performing, wealthy suburban public school than a modern, elite NWDC private school.
Um, no. In 2014, NCS had four NMSF and Maret had 1. http://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/1310966/d-c-semifinalists-in-2015-national-merit.pdf. Potomac had seven. http://www.potomacschool.org/news/index.aspx.
Also, when the Washingtonian surveyed educational consultants, it came up with a list of six Academic All-Stars: Sidwell, NCS, St. Albans, GDS, Potomac. http://www.washingtonian.com/articles/work-education/a-private-school-for-every-student/
It's fine to have an opinion, but if you are going to assert facts you shouldn't just make them up.
And Potomac had a great number of Presidential Scholars this year:
http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/15/443889.page
Quick review and counting looks like, with each school's multi-year average in (parentheses):
STA 10 (average 5)
NCS 6 (7)
Potomac 6 (2)
Maret 6 (6)
SFS 7 (11)
GDS 11 (6)
Holton 1 (2)
Landon 1 (1)
Anonymous wrote:Okay, Potomac boosters, while you jumped on the NMSF and other academic awards part, you ignored the charge that
"Potomac is in a suburban neighborhood...., it is nothing particularly special. It has a mostly white and preppy student body and is frankly, rather bland. It is more akin to a high performing, wealthy suburban public school than a modern, elite NWDC private school."
So, anything to say to this?
Anonymous wrote:PP: That's it! If my DC gets into TJ, that's where DC is going. I'm going to use the $ I would have spent on private school to buy myself a nice car and take a nice vacation (or two!)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Re NMSF -- if "commended" is a nationally normed designation (and I think it is), that would enable you to make a better comparison across schools. In any event, it's a better measure of what you're trying to capture (i.e. cohort)
Not sure why people are getting hung up on the cut-off point about NMSF -- MD, DC, and Virginia are ALL THREE in the top six for cut-offs, along with California, Massachusetts, and New York. It is really hard to get in any of these states. But if you really want to be hyper-technical you can look at the mark for "commended," which is the same everywhere (201), which is still a very good score. To pick two schools at random, last year Potomac had 28 "commended" students and NCS had 32.
I'm not certain why people are so hung up on this, all the top area schools do well. Here is a table compiled over the last five years of all NMSF winners. It shows that GDS, Maret, and Georgetown Prep are average or lower among the top schools in terms of percentage of NMSF. Are we all going to conclude these schools are suddenly not good schools? Of course not, this is just one piece of information.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnukIDABt_JKdDdZYXlQbnFUQ0VfMHRpTFp1SUIxS2c&hl=en_US#gid=0
OMG, this table contains incredible data! Did you compiled these yourself? Just want to know the source of these numbers.
They do look as expected in terms of how each school performs.
GO TJ!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Re NMSF -- if "commended" is a nationally normed designation (and I think it is), that would enable you to make a better comparison across schools. In any event, it's a better measure of what you're trying to capture (i.e. cohort)
Not sure why people are getting hung up on the cut-off point about NMSF -- MD, DC, and Virginia are ALL THREE in the top six for cut-offs, along with California, Massachusetts, and New York. It is really hard to get in any of these states. But if you really want to be hyper-technical you can look at the mark for "commended," which is the same everywhere (201), which is still a very good score. To pick two schools at random, last year Potomac had 28 "commended" students and NCS had 32.
I'm not certain why people are so hung up on this, all the top area schools do well. Here is a table compiled over the last five years of all NMSF winners. It shows that GDS, Maret, and Georgetown Prep are average or lower among the top schools in terms of percentage of NMSF. Are we all going to conclude these schools are suddenly not good schools? Of course not, this is just one piece of information.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnukIDABt_JKdDdZYXlQbnFUQ0VfMHRpTFp1SUIxS2c&hl=en_US#gid=0
Anonymous wrote:Okay, Potomac boosters, while you jumped on the NMSF and other academic awards part, you ignored the charge that
"Potomac is in a suburban neighborhood...., it is nothing particularly special. It has a mostly white and preppy student body and is frankly, rather bland. It is more akin to a high performing, wealthy suburban public school than a modern, elite NWDC private school."
So, anything to say to this?
Anonymous wrote:Re NMSF -- if "commended" is a nationally normed designation (and I think it is), that would enable you to make a better comparison across schools. In any event, it's a better measure of what you're trying to capture (i.e. cohort)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think people who are fixated on the reputation of the big three are out of step -- a couple of decades ago you could say there were just a couple of tippy-top schools, but given objective criteria -- college placement, rigor of curriculum, quality of students -- you have to say there are more top schools today. Ignoring this would be like saying the only top colleges are in the Ivy League. Potomac is one of the top area schools, it is up to you if you want to be obsessed about the name. Colleges know it is good, isn't that enough?
Potomac is NOT as good a school as STA, NCS, Sidwell, Maret or arguably some others. Potomac does not have the same level of academic rigor, as high a number of NMSF/NMF, or as good a record of getting its graduates into the most competitive colleges. Potomac is in a suburban neighborhood and while it has an attractive campus, it is nothing particularly special. It has a mostly white and preppy student body and is frankly, rather bland. It is more akin to a high performing, wealthy suburban public school than a modern, elite NWDC private school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Potomac has always felt like a public school that charges 35k to attend. There is nothing they do that differentiates them as unique or special.
You have never been there, that is clear.
Why are your knickers in a twist over this?? Yes, I have been there and that is why I have the opinion I do.