Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I agree that it's a fad. The language of the world and business is English. That's clear everywhere I travel.
I've taken German, my husband took Russian, and my son Mandarin -- but we never use it.
I've taken Calculus and never use that either.
I'm the PP. I never took Calculus. Good move on my part since I've never needed it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
does it annoy you when schools teache instrument/choir instead of science?
Nope, because at least at my kids' schools, those are treated as extras meeting once a week, maybe twice. Language is a more intensive exercise.
So you're against foreign language not Mandarin/Chinese?
Yes, my criticism applies to all foreign language study, not just Mandarin, although it is particularly applicable to Mandarin. As made clear in other posts, I'm not "against" foreign language, but rather critical of the mandated time spent on learning foreign languages.
How about the mandated time spent on learning math, science, English, or social studies? Are you critical of that too? I've certainly never used ox-redox reactions in my life; or had to solve a pair of simultaneous equations; or been asked my opinions of the motivations of the nurse vs. the friar in Romeo and Juliet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
does it annoy you when schools teache instrument/choir instead of science?
Nope, because at least at my kids' schools, those are treated as extras meeting once a week, maybe twice. Language is a more intensive exercise.
So you're against foreign language not Mandarin/Chinese?
Yes, my criticism applies to all foreign language study, not just Mandarin, although it is particularly applicable to Mandarin. As made clear in other posts, I'm not "against" foreign language, but rather critical of the mandated time spent on learning foreign languages.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
does it annoy you when schools teache instrument/choir instead of science?
Nope, because at least at my kids' schools, those are treated as extras meeting once a week, maybe twice. Language is a more intensive exercise.
So you're against foreign language not Mandarin/Chinese?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We said all the same things about Japanese in the 80 s
Yup.
You guys are going to look pretty dumb in 20 years, sorry
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
does it annoy you when schools teache instrument/choir instead of science?
Nope, because at least at my kids' schools, those are treated as extras meeting once a week, maybe twice. Language is a more intensive exercise.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unlike the situation in Europe, Chinese businessmen and politicians are not likely to expect that a typical American caucasian, latino or AA would understand their language - which could be to huge advantage
Agree. Even if the meeting is conducted in English, they may speak to each other in their native language, in which case, it is very advantageous that you understand their language.
I'm of a particular heritage, and can speak/understand passably. But, I don't "look" like that ethnicity, so I've been told by people of that ethnicity. There have been many times where people were speaking in that language about me, and I could understand every word. Sometimes I'll respond to them in that language or in English, and the shock on their faces is priceless.
I know of companies that do business with China, who in their talent recruitment efforts, deliberately pass over Mandarin speaking Asians in favor of non-Asian Mandarin speakers for that very reason of advantage.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
People don't speak the written language.
Well, I don't think you are a native speaker, are you? I am. I can tell you for the majority of Chinese dialect, the difference is only in pronunciation. The vocabulary is the same, the grammar is the same, the difference in pronunciation minor. There is a reason it is called dialect. And the reason why China didn't develop multiple languages as Europe did. Well, it is because we share the same written language.
So somebody who speaks only Cantonese can understand somebody who speaks only Mandarin, when they speak to each other, without using any writing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Unlike the situation in Europe, Chinese businessmen and politicians are not likely to expect that a typical American caucasian, latino or AA would understand their language - which could be to huge advantage
Agree. Even if the meeting is conducted in English, they may speak to each other in their native language, in which case, it is very advantageous that you understand their language.
I'm of a particular heritage, and can speak/understand passably. But, I don't "look" like that ethnicity, so I've been told by people of that ethnicity. There have been many times where people were speaking in that language about me, and I could understand every word. Sometimes I'll respond to them in that language or in English, and the shock on their faces is priceless.
Anonymous wrote:Unlike the situation in Europe, Chinese businessmen and politicians are not likely to expect that a typical American caucasian, latino or AA would understand their language - which could be to huge advantage
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
People don't speak the written language.
Well, I don't think you are a native speaker, are you? I am. I can tell you for the majority of Chinese dialect, the difference is only in pronunciation. The vocabulary is the same, the grammar is the same, the difference in pronunciation minor. There is a reason it is called dialect. And the reason why China didn't develop multiple languages as Europe did. Well, it is because we share the same written language.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So basically what some of you are saying is that unless a skill or study registers with and relates to you personally then you perceive it as a pointless pursuit.
Hmmmm - I see why you have such difficulty understanding. Enjoy your small closed-minded corner.
No, you are missing my point. I'm NOT saying Mandarin or any other language is pointless, NOR am I saying it is pointless to study something that doesn't relate to me. What I AM saying is that students have a limited amount of time for learning, and perhaps for most students, that limited items is better spent learning things more useful than Mandarin. For those who really want to study Mandarin, or any other language, they should be able to study it. But for the many other students who won't get a lot from Mandarin, maybe their time is better spent pursuing something more useful.
When a school requires all students to start learning a language in 4th grade (or whatever age), it is essentially making a value judgment that learning another language is more valuable than whatever might otherwise fit in that spot - perhaps a daily science class, or maybe a world history class. That's the value judgment that annoys me, because I think more kids will get value out off the science class than the Mandarin class.
Anonymous wrote:That would surprise me too. The frogs get all pissy if you don’t speak their language perfectly - and none of us are going to be able to do that. A few well chosen phrases can do wonders with the ladies, however.