Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In private school parents are the customers and treated as such. Why should public school be any different?
Because you don't pay for it. You sort of do through taxes, but if you leave they don't lose money because you "took your business elsewhere."
Anonymous wrote:In private school parents are the customers and treated as such. Why should public school be any different?
Anonymous wrote:When I looked at private schools vs. public, I was struck by the number of former lawyers now teaching in independent schools. These teachers are fabulous at teaching English and presenting a polished, professional outlook and interesting discussion for their students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: This is what happens when business people get too involved in education. Teachers do not have "customers."
I think this comment gets to the nub of the conflict. Many teachers seem to feel their profession is a calling, almost like the priesthood, where they should be lauded for their sacrifices and honored for the education that got them the teaching position. But many parents and policy makers now expect more - they want the teachers who are most successful at educating students. Perhaps it's also a function of the fact that, unlike the past, there are now more people who want to be teachers than there are teacher jobs, so those doing the hiring can afford to be picky. Speaking as a parent who wants good teachers for my children, I have no vendetta against teachers generally, nor do I want to wage war on teachers. But I get frustrated when I encounter less effective teachers, and I get even more frustrated when I hear stories about how hard it is for schools to remove those ineffective teachers. In short, teacher should consider themselves to have "customers" now.
Anonymous wrote: This is what happens when business people get too involved in education. Teachers do not have "customers."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A public school can't hire a teacher who is not highly qualified for the position. They have to be certified for the area they are teaching. Do you want to know where the teacher went to college/grad school?
Every MD has to pass the boards, do you research the doctors you choose to go to? Look at their schooling? ask around about their reputation? I wish we could do that with teachers. I have no idea how to make it work, but if parents could vote with their feet, a lot of bad teachers would find they didn't have any customers.
Anonymous wrote:I think this is exactly right.
Anonymous wrote:One of the unintentional consequences of increasing opportunities for women in the 70s meant that the teaching force declined in quality. Bright female college graduates used to be mostly limited to teaching, but now they go to law school, medical school etc. instead. Not justifying a return to the sexist division of labor of the 1950s, but now the teaching profession needs to work harder to attract top quality applicants.
Anonymous wrote:MD former teacher here. I'm currently a pediatric oncologist and let me tell you there is absolutely no way in hell anyone (including insurers) are hassling me about patient outcomes. I am trusted to do the best I can to save my patients' lives.
When I was a teacher, I wasn't given this deference. It was so, so different and if you don't get it, you really do not understand what a sad, messed up state our education system is in right now.
Everyone wants to innovate. Even doctors. But you have to implement and that's where the respect goes out the window. We don't respect teachers like our medical treaters. It suckss.
Anonymous wrote:A public school can't hire a teacher who is not highly qualified for the position. They have to be certified for the area they are teaching. Do you want to know where the teacher went to college/grad school?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Could you elaborate?
Sure. I'm a big advocate of the "Finnish model." Since it performs well, the education "reformers" (reform isn't a bad thing, but a certain type of "reform" dominates the debate) sing praises to Finland, including Arne Duncan. For example the film Waiting for Superman praises the success of Finland but then trashes teachers unions and teacher education as useless, and says the TFA approach is better. In Finland, teachers are unionized, have master's degrees in education and there's no charter schools and no emphasis on "teaching to the test."
Anonymous wrote: I do think teachers overall do not get enough respect and most deserve it. It's a lot of hours for mediocre pay and difficult parents and kids. However, even the most snooty parents I have encountered, have great respect for the truly talented/outstanding teachers.
The problem is the bad ones give the profession a bad name. I have encountered teachers who can't write coherent paragraphs and who make every grammatical mistake in the book. The standards for education programs are too low and there are too many classes that are too easy.