Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Washington Post has a bizarre caption on a photo of a looter. It's #41 "A protester walks out of a store with goods in Ferguson, Missouri. David Goldman/AP"
Was he shopping and bought a take-out meal?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/grand-jury-to-reveal-decision/2014/11/24/69d89410-71ad-11e4-ad12-3734c461eab6_gallery.html?hpid=z2
photo #13, 400 years of African Slavery? WTH?
[b]They remain slaves to themselves, to each other, to their victim mentality and to their rage....
[/b]
The sign maker is smarter than you. African slave trade began, sometime in the 1500's. African's were being enslaved long before there was an America.
PP here - I wasn't talking about when the slavery started. I was just surprised AAs still talk about slavery like that happened yesterday. Looking back and constantly crying "we are the victims" won't help anyone. You CAN'T stay stuck in history! You need to move on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Personally, the looting just causes me to dismiss the whole protest as a bunch of out-of-control thugs intent on violence.
I can't take Ferguson opponents seriously at this point. The GJ has spoken. Get over it.
+1. It's their own neighbors in the grand jury that chose not to indict. Not the gvernment's fault.
First: Please have a look at the process. Wilson was never cross-examined by the prosecutor. His grand jury testimony differed sharply from his police interview questions on several key issues.
Second: Why does one half of the country need to "get over it" and accept this flawed non-indictment as gospel when the other half of the country thinks that the NINTH investigation into Benghazi is the one that will finally reveal the "truth"?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Personally, the looting just causes me to dismiss the whole protest as a bunch of out-of-control thugs intent on violence.
I can't take Ferguson opponents seriously at this point. The GJ has spoken. Get over it.
+1. It's their own neighbors in the grand jury that chose not to indict. Not the gvernment's fault.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Washington Post has a bizarre caption on a photo of a looter. It's #41 "A protester walks out of a store with goods in Ferguson, Missouri. David Goldman/AP"
Was he shopping and bought a take-out meal?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/grand-jury-to-reveal-decision/2014/11/24/69d89410-71ad-11e4-ad12-3734c461eab6_gallery.html?hpid=z2
photo #13, 400 years of African Slavery? WTH?
They remain slaves to themselves, to each other, to their victim mentality and to their rage....
The sign maker is smarter than you. African slave trade began, sometime in the 1500's. African's were being enslaved long before there was an America.
Anonymous wrote:Now, that you've gotten the looters out of your system, what say you about the peaceful protesters who want change? Hmm....nothing? Thought so.Anonymous wrote:To get free hair weave and pampers!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm AA and it's embarrassing! As Chris Rock has said "I love my people, but I hate NI**$!S!!! They destroy their own neighborhoods..bunch of stupid, uneducated hoodlums! I say, take them out at the knees.
+1
Wanna really get back at The Man? [b]Start going to and graduating from college in droves. That'll show them can't keep AAs down.
THIS!!!!! Well said.[/b]
Anonymous wrote:Personally, the looting just causes me to dismiss the whole protest as a bunch of out-of-control thugs intent on violence.
I can't take Ferguson opponents seriously at this point. The GJ has spoken. Get over it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm AA and it's embarrassing! As Chris Rock has said "I love my people, but I hate NI**$!S!!! They destroy their own neighborhoods..bunch of stupid, uneducated hoodlums! I say, take them out at the knees.
I don't believe for one minute that you are black.
NP here. I'm not black but I'm embarrassed for the black community. None of the black people I know would participate in the looting. What parents would even let their children go out last night? It's disgraceful.
If you're not black, and none of the black people you know would participate in the looting, then why, exactly, are you embarrassed for "the black community"?
Exactly. What a ridiculous contradiction. I am Black. I am an individual. No one person or group speaks for me.
All those crazy ass people stealing TVs and cigarettes are claiming to speak for you.
STFU
No they are not
Did you see someone grabbing a TV and stopping and telling people: "This is for all the millions of other black people I don't know!!
STFU AGAIN
Tell me again, why were they rioting? Oh yeah that's right. I must have completely misunderstood everything I've read and heard on the news? I thought the black community was angry how they're being treated by the police. That's what I heard Jesse Jackson, official voice of the black community, just say on the TV. I guess he's wrong too. Please tell me was this is about again?
1) Jesse Jackson speaks for Jesse Jackson -- no one appointed him King of black people
2) how is being frustrated with their treatment in their community somehow speaking for millions of OTHER black people that live elsewhere
3) *sigh*
Which makes me think that black people rally around Jesse Jackson and their own community when it serves their purpose. Otherwise they're just individuals.
So in the end what you're saying is these people are just looting for the sake of it.
That's funny! Were you aware that Jesse Jackson was heckled out of Ferguson? Or that they asked Sharpton not to come back after the funeral?
The folks you see on TV do NOT speak for the people on the ground. Perhaps, you should learn who the protestors are who have been peaccefully protesting for over 100 days. They are Black and Whites - many with college degrees.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm AA and it's embarrassing! As Chris Rock has said "I love my people, but I hate NI**$!S!!! They destroy their own neighborhoods..bunch of stupid, uneducated hoodlums! I say, take them out at the knees.
I don't believe for one minute that you are black.
NP here. I'm not black but I'm embarrassed for the black community. None of the black people I know would participate in the looting. What parents would even let their children go out last night? It's disgraceful.
If you're not black, and none of the black people you know would participate in the looting, then why, exactly, are you embarrassed for "the black community"?
Exactly. What a ridiculous contradiction. I am Black. I am an individual. No one person or group speaks for me.
All those crazy ass people stealing TVs and cigarettes are claiming to speak for you.
STFU
No they are not
Did you see someone grabbing a TV and stopping and telling people: "This is for all the millions of other black people I don't know!!
STFU AGAIN
Tell me again, why were they rioting? Oh yeah that's right. I must have completely misunderstood everything I've read and heard on the news? I thought the black community was angry how they're being treated by the police. That's what I heard Jesse Jackson, official voice of the black community, just say on the TV. I guess he's wrong too. Please tell me was this is about again?
1) Jesse Jackson speaks for Jesse Jackson -- no one appointed him King of black people
2) how is being frustrated with their treatment in their community somehow speaking for millions of OTHER black people that live elsewhere
3) *sigh*
Which makes me think that black people rally around Jesse Jackson and their own community when it serves their purpose. Otherwise they're just individuals.
So in the end what you're saying is these people are just looting for the sake of it.
Anonymous wrote:Personally, the looting just causes me to dismiss the whole protest as a bunch of out-of-control thugs intent on violence.
I can't take Ferguson opponents seriously at this point. The GJ has spoken. Get over it.
Anonymous wrote: When looting starts here, I'm headed straight to the Apple store.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Washington Post has a bizarre caption on a photo of a looter. It's #41 "A protester walks out of a store with goods in Ferguson, Missouri. David Goldman/AP"
Was he shopping and bought a take-out meal?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/grand-jury-to-reveal-decision/2014/11/24/69d89410-71ad-11e4-ad12-3734c461eab6_gallery.html?hpid=z2
photo #13, 400 years of African Slavery? WTH?
They remain slaves to themselves, to each other, to their victim mentality and to their rage....
Now, that you've gotten the looters out of your system, what say you about the peaceful protesters who want change? Hmm....nothing? Thought so.Anonymous wrote:To get free hair weave and pampers!