Anonymous wrote:Me and two of my coworkers were hired by USAJobs. We all have STEM degrees, though.
My process took from September (applying) to November (offer). Then 4 months for a background check/clearance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Me and two of my coworkers were hired by USAJobs. We all have STEM degrees, though.
My process took from September (applying) to November (offer). Then 4 months for a background check/clearance.
But no instruction in grammar?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Me and two of my coworkers were hired by USAJobs. We all have STEM degrees, though.
My process took from September (applying) to November (offer). Then 4 months for a background check/clearance.
But no instruction in grammar?
Anonymous wrote:Me and two of my coworkers were hired by USAJobs. We all have STEM degrees, though.
My process took from September (applying) to November (offer). Then 4 months for a background check/clearance.
Anonymous wrote:I have a similar broken promise regarding telework agreement.
I once had a co-worker asking for a blackberry as he traveled extensively for work and need to keep up with emails. Was told he wasn't important enough and high enough (grade-wise) to qualify for a blackberry. From that point on, he stopped answering any call to his private cellphone (alert roster/exercise be damned)...

Anonymous wrote:Oh and USA Jobs needs to be more specific on telework and family friendly. My coworker got hired into a "telework friendly" job posting on USA Jobs. Once hired she was told:
-work is from 9:30-6 daily. Absolutely no exceptions or you'll be taking annual leave. (didn't work with people's daycare schedules or carpools, so this was the #1 reason for leaving)
-no telework, even on snow days
-you must walk into the boss's office and sign in on paper daily and during lunch break
She left ASAP as did everyone else. That job posting is currently posted on USA Jobs right nowGood luck applying for that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I recently applied for a job I was very highly qualified for, and had inside connections.
There were 300+ applicants, 100 of whom apparently rated themselves as a 5/5 on every single qualification in the multiple choice questionnaire, basically saying they regularly supervised others doing tasks that were ridiculously diverse and very obscure. Even the hiring manager thought it was pretty unlikely such people existed in such quantities, especially considering it was a mid-level position. Of those, HR reviewers (who had little understanding of what would actually make a good candidate for the particular position) sent a handful of the 100 perfect scoring resumes to the agency. My resume didn't even make the 100 cut, since, while I was generous with the questionnaire, I didn't blatantly lie. So yeah, I think the process is a bit of a joke.
I haven't applied for a fed job in awhile, but isn't there some disclaimer about consequences for being caught lying on those questionnaires? Is that all BS?
I helped my sister apply to jobs for new grads. 75% of the questions were specific to the government. Things such as "supervised others on the government tracking system" or years of experience with government equipment. Insane. How do they expect 22 year olds to have supervised people before? Obviously HR idiots make the questions. My sister was wanted by the agency hiring also so she was exactly what they were looking for.
Take the age out of it, some people have not been in a supervisory role for a variety of reasons. Some organizations don't believe in creating a career ladder.
The times I have applied, I have been honest on the multiple choice portion as well. I think that USA Jobs uses some program to find keywords that rarely exist for most people. That is pure laziness. Not everything can be explained on a resume, especially when a resume is supposed to be 2 pages at most.
For federal jobs, the longer the resume the better.
Anonymous wrote:A Fed here...
True story: I once reviewed a resume for a GS-13 position. This person did not even graduate from college yet. His only "job" was Burger King. How did he get through HR screening? He basically copied and pasted the whole job announcement into his "resume" and stated that he is applied in reference to the announcement below... Kinda like eBay listings with a bunch of bogus keywords. In this case he hits every one of them.
USAJOBS HR is utterly useless.