Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Look at Rachel Carson. They actually built a school for the development and it is 70% over-capacity. What about Fallsgrove, King Farm, Rockville Town Center, Crown, all the new high rise condo buildings in Bethesda and the future Science City. NO schools built for them. None. Zero. The schools built for Clarksburg weren't enough. Brand new schools overcrowded and spending MORE money getting feasibility studies, additions, new schools etc... Tons of portables already up there. Poor planning - tons of money wasting away to now improve the poor projections.
The schools at Clarksburg were never intended to be enough. The Clarksburg Master Plan calls for multiple schools. The capacity at Little Bennett is 673, the capacity at Wims is probably the same since it's basically the same building; and then there's another eventual school site at Cabin Branch. Do you think that MCPS should have built one elementary school in Clarksburg, with a capacity of 2,100, for all of the students who may eventually come?
What's more, of course MCPS hasn't built any schools for Crown or Science City, given that building has just started at Crown, and there will not be any building for years at Science City. MCPS is already several hundred millions dollars short on capital funding to serve the needs of existing students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
YES. So many ways to address these problems ahead of time that would be way more efficient and responsive than this piecemeal, wait-and-see approach they take now, which is neither cost-effective nor best for the students. I don't even know why they are sending Crispell to these meetings if all he is going to say is that MCPS will do nada, nothing, zilch to prepare for these new developments that -- news flash -- DO get built. Just drive around the county and you can see hundreds and thousands of new units going up. The excuse of "sometimes things don't get built" just rings hollow.
For example?
Anonymous wrote:
YES. So many ways to address these problems ahead of time that would be way more efficient and responsive than this piecemeal, wait-and-see approach they take now, which is neither cost-effective nor best for the students. I don't even know why they are sending Crispell to these meetings if all he is going to say is that MCPS will do nada, nothing, zilch to prepare for these new developments that -- news flash -- DO get built. Just drive around the county and you can see hundreds and thousands of new units going up. The excuse of "sometimes things don't get built" just rings hollow.
Anonymous wrote:
Look at Rachel Carson. They actually built a school for the development and it is 70% over-capacity. What about Fallsgrove, King Farm, Rockville Town Center, Crown, all the new high rise condo buildings in Bethesda and the future Science City. NO schools built for them. None. Zero. The schools built for Clarksburg weren't enough. Brand new schools overcrowded and spending MORE money getting feasibility studies, additions, new schools etc... Tons of portables already up there. Poor planning - tons of money wasting away to now improve the poor projections.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Science City is the planned development around Belward Farm. The official name is the Great Seneca Science Corridor.
There aren't going to be 6,000 residential units at Science City any time soon. MCPS has capacity needs that are far more immediate and urgent.
But the question is, how are they preparing for it IN ADVANCE? By their history, my guess is nothing. Once schools hit 6+ portables they will look to "study" for an addition.
What do you think that MCPS should be doing, to prepare for a residential development that may happen at some time in the future but will not happen any time soon?
If you know that existing area schools are already overcrowded, it is irresponsible to sit by and do nothing when developers are planning to build thousands of new units and not consider either building a new school to receive the new residents, or to start planning for additions to existing schools. All of that takes a lot of time, and to put off any planning until the overcrowding is a overwhelming reality is incredibly shortsighted. How many "studies" are launched only to find that funding isn't there, or the planning and building itself takes so many years that kids literally age out of the school before relief comes? Maybe to planners and developers, 5-6 years is nothing, but that is an eternity for a kid.
+1000. The developers should be responsible for the school buildings if they want to build 6000 new homes. It is done almost everywhere else in the country but for some reason MC has this strange desire to let the developers/contractors hold all the cards. If they have the money to build this and make a huge profit, part of those profits need to go building schools.
Look at Rachel Carson. They actually built a school for the development and it is 70% over-capacity. What about Fallsgrove, King Farm, Rockville Town Center, Crown, all the new high rise condo buildings in Bethesda and the future Science City. NO schools built for them. None. Zero. The schools built for Clarksburg weren't enough. Brand new schools overcrowded and spending MORE money getting feasibility studies, additions, new schools etc... Tons of portables already up there. Poor planning - tons of money wasting away to now improve the poor projections.
I have no idea how they do not built an unfinished 3rd floor in EVERY new school they built. Just another thing MANY other locations do with their schools. It is 10X cheaper to do this and close it off for future use than it is to build a school based on probable projections, find out it is overcrowded, do feasibility studies, look for funding, do the planning, bid the job, hire the people, possibly put the kids in holding schools to finish the job etc...
I mean Richard Montgomery High School was JUST rebuilt from the ground up a few years ago and they are now looking at starting a feasibility study for an addition. College Gardens, brand new a few years ago has portables all over the blacktops. Building unfinished areas of schools ahead of time makes much more sense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Science City is the planned development around Belward Farm. The official name is the Great Seneca Science Corridor.
There aren't going to be 6,000 residential units at Science City any time soon. MCPS has capacity needs that are far more immediate and urgent.
But the question is, how are they preparing for it IN ADVANCE? By their history, my guess is nothing. Once schools hit 6+ portables they will look to "study" for an addition.
What do you think that MCPS should be doing, to prepare for a residential development that may happen at some time in the future but will not happen any time soon?
If you know that existing area schools are already overcrowded, it is irresponsible to sit by and do nothing when developers are planning to build thousands of new units and not consider either building a new school to receive the new residents, or to start planning for additions to existing schools. All of that takes a lot of time, and to put off any planning until the overcrowding is a overwhelming reality is incredibly shortsighted. How many "studies" are launched only to find that funding isn't there, or the planning and building itself takes so many years that kids literally age out of the school before relief comes? Maybe to planners and developers, 5-6 years is nothing, but that is an eternity for a kid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Science City is the planned development around Belward Farm. The official name is the Great Seneca Science Corridor.
There aren't going to be 6,000 residential units at Science City any time soon. MCPS has capacity needs that are far more immediate and urgent.
But the question is, how are they preparing for it IN ADVANCE? By their history, my guess is nothing. Once schools hit 6+ portables they will look to "study" for an addition.
What do you think that MCPS should be doing, to prepare for a residential development that may happen at some time in the future but will not happen any time soon?
If you know that existing area schools are already overcrowded, it is irresponsible to sit by and do nothing when developers are planning to build thousands of new units and not consider either building a new school to receive the new residents, or to start planning for additions to existing schools. All of that takes a lot of time, and to put off any planning until the overcrowding is a overwhelming reality is incredibly shortsighted. How many "studies" are launched only to find that funding isn't there, or the planning and building itself takes so many years that kids literally age out of the school before relief comes? Maybe to planners and developers, 5-6 years is nothing, but that is an eternity for a kid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Science City is the planned development around Belward Farm. The official name is the Great Seneca Science Corridor.
There aren't going to be 6,000 residential units at Science City any time soon. MCPS has capacity needs that are far more immediate and urgent.
But the question is, how are they preparing for it IN ADVANCE? By their history, my guess is nothing. Once schools hit 6+ portables they will look to "study" for an addition.
What do you think that MCPS should be doing, to prepare for a residential development that may happen at some time in the future but will not happen any time soon?
Anonymous wrote:
The planning commission and the developers have made it clear that redevelopment in the Westbard sector (which is necessary...it's pretty run down) will only happen if they can earn enough profit from housing developments. So they want density to be as high as the community can bear. At a meeting last night, Bruce Crispell, MCPS's Director of Long Range Planning, said that MCPS will adopt a wait and see approach -- rather than do studies now to figure out where additional students from the redeveloped area would go, MCPS will wait to see what the developers plan for, wait to see if Wood Acres (which they admit can't be expanded any farther) becomes grossly overcrowded again, and by how much, and THEN -- and only then -- will they start doing studies to plan for a solution.
Anonymous wrote:I have wondered this as well - when we bought two years ago we looked at homes in the RC area. I wonder if any RC parents would be willing to send their kids to Fields Road (for example). Most buy wanting to their kids to go to RC.
This is what the long range planning document currently says:
" Projections indicate that
enrollment at Rachel Carson Elementary School
will exceed capacity by 92 seats or more by
the end of the six-year period. Enrollment will
continue to be monitored to determine whether
it is necessary to develop plans to relieve the
overutilization at Rachel Carson Elementary School in the future."
It SHOCKS me that MCPS does not have more of a plan than this....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Science City is the planned development around Belward Farm. The official name is the Great Seneca Science Corridor.
There aren't going to be 6,000 residential units at Science City any time soon. MCPS has capacity needs that are far more immediate and urgent.
But the question is, how are they preparing for it IN ADVANCE? By their history, my guess is nothing. Once schools hit 6+ portables they will look to "study" for an addition.
Anonymous wrote:Science City is the planned development around Belward Farm. The official name is the Great Seneca Science Corridor.
There aren't going to be 6,000 residential units at Science City any time soon. MCPS has capacity needs that are far more immediate and urgent.
Anonymous wrote:
Plus, we like having a walkable community. Isn't that what MoCo talks about with Smart Growth? If so many people are enjoying a walkable community, MoCo will then talk about busing them across major roads? Doesn't make sense...
Anonymous wrote:I have 2 kids at RCES and it's crazy. The school has capacity of 650, had about 800 5 years ago, and shot up over 1000 kids without any development. People just really like the neighborhood and how walkable it is... and it's not only rich people here - there are plenty of rental apartments in the neighborhood as well as fancier spots (I rent a small townhouse). And, the education is good/teachers are great. The kids leave well-prepared, except...
We're nearing 400 kids overcapacity - my daughter eats at 10:45 and there is barely any space for recess with 11 portables. Most other schools in the general area are overcapacity and the 3 schools undercapacity (Dufief, Darnestown, Travilah) have less than 250 seats available between the three. Fields Road now is over 100 overcapacity, Rosemont is getting Crown and is projected to be nearly 300 overcapacity soon... ugh. They can't build additions fast enough.
Also, other MoCo schools are fantastic, but it will take 5-7 years to develop space to send our kids and there is so much new development coming that will eat up those seats before our kids can get there. There is no answer - it's like a cat chasing it's tail. This is why we've been asking for MCPS to build another new school in the general neighborhood - we can quickly use up the seats at a brand new school, and it's the only way to ensure that our kids get those spots rather than kids from newly built developments. Dufief will get an addition in 5-7 years, and will soon be overcrowded after that - Science City is coming with 6000 new homes! In the next 5 years, EVERY seat in the Gaithersburg/Rockville area will be filled and ALL schools will be overcrowded.
Plus, we like having a walkable community. Isn't that what MoCo talks about with Smart Growth? If so many people are enjoying a walkable community, MoCo will then talk about busing them across major roads? Doesn't make sense...