Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh! I didn't notice that the school called OP, who was at work, rather than DH, who was at home.
That's another problem with the school. As Ruth Bader Ginsburg famously said, "This child has two parents."
Schools call the number that's listed first on the emergency form. I assume that was the mother's number. They were able to reach her so I don't think they needed to contact the next on the list.
See how that works?
I think that it would make sense for the number that's listed first on the emergency form to belong to the parent who is closest to the school, even if that parent is not the mother.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh! I didn't notice that the school called OP, who was at work, rather than DH, who was at home.
That's another problem with the school. As Ruth Bader Ginsburg famously said, "This child has two parents."
Schools call the number that's listed first on the emergency form. I assume that was the mother's number. They were able to reach her so I don't think they needed to contact the next on the list.
See how that works?
Anonymous wrote:Oh! I didn't notice that the school called OP, who was at work, rather than DH, who was at home.
That's another problem with the school. As Ruth Bader Ginsburg famously said, "This child has two parents."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1) Why in the heck did the school think this warranted a phone call? Good grief, it's one day.
2) That said, DH really could have done it, unless he had a crazy day of working from home or needed to be there for a repairman. If he can great, if not well, oh well.
3) You leaving work early and driving over an hour home? That was insane. Totally unnecessary...and on top of it it undermined the decision your DH already made. You should have let it go.
4) Since nearly all these involve not delivering the PJs, apologize to DS when he gets home and do something extra nice like have ice cream after dinner.
Done.
This is great, sound advice. Please could you be my therapist?
Anonymous wrote:Oh! I didn't notice that the school called OP, who was at work, rather than DH, who was at home.
That's another problem with the school. As Ruth Bader Ginsburg famously said, "This child has two parents."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
But there's still you leaving work because you didn't like your husband's decision as parent-on-the-spot. How much faith and trust do you have in your husband as a father?
What? Ridiculous. Husband said he wasn't going to go, does not mean that OP cannot go.
I'm guessing that the conversation went more like this:
Wife: You should bring him the pajamas.
Husband: No, he'll be fine.
Than like this:
Wife: You should bring him the pajamas.
Husband: No, but it's fine if you do.
Not OP, but sometimes, I suspect some of my DH parenting decisions have more to do with his convenience (not waking up at night, sleeping in the AM) than any serious child-rearing philosophy. So he does not really care if I do something as long as he does not have to.
Anonymous wrote:As an aside I'd like to share with you all that I HATE THE SPECIAL DRESS-UP DAYS. It's a nightmare to remember, try to find the right clothes, etc.
Anonymous wrote:1) Why in the heck did the school think this warranted a phone call? Good grief, it's one day.
2) That said, DH really could have done it, unless he had a crazy day of working from home or needed to be there for a repairman. If he can great, if not well, oh well.
3) You leaving work early and driving over an hour home? That was insane. Totally unnecessary...and on top of it it undermined the decision your DH already made. You should have let it go.
4) Since nearly all these involve not delivering the PJs, apologize to DS when he gets home and do something extra nice like have ice cream after dinner.
Done.
Anonymous wrote:1) Why in the heck did the school think this warranted a phone call? Good grief, it's one day.
2) That said, DH really could have done it, unless he had a crazy day of working from home or needed to be there for a repairman. If he can great, if not well, oh well.
3) You leaving work early and driving over an hour home? That was insane. Totally unnecessary...and on top of it it undermined the decision your DH already made. You should have let it go.
4) Since nearly all these involve not delivering the PJs, apologize to DS when he gets home and do something extra nice like have ice cream after dinner.
Done.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
But there's still you leaving work because you didn't like your husband's decision as parent-on-the-spot. How much faith and trust do you have in your husband as a father?
What? Ridiculous. Husband said he wasn't going to go, does not mean that OP cannot go.
I'm guessing that the conversation went more like this:
Wife: You should bring him the pajamas.
Husband: No, he'll be fine.
Than like this:
Wife: You should bring him the pajamas.
Husband: No, but it's fine if you do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Is it mean that I teach my DC to deal with disappointments?
So, if your K cries because another kid won a prize and your kid didn't, would you run out and buy your DC a prize? Wow. That's teaching your DC ...oh what's it called... oh I know... the world revolves and caters to what you want.
But this is different. It's more like the time I realized that the function was formal, but I was wearing jeans and felt uncomfortable all day. I'm grown, so I didn't cry, but I sure would have been pissed if I was in that situation because someone else had messed up.
NP. Good analogy. I would like to think that in that scenario if I had called DH at home and been able to give sufficiently specific info on what I wanted he could have made a quick trip to bring me the appropriate outfit and jewelry. I've done something similar for him on many occasions.
If a family member or close friend of mine has an oops moment and forgets something that results in them being/feeling horribly out of place in a situation or otherwise in a bind and I reasonably can make an attempt to fix it without too much inconvenience, I'm likely to do so. This would obviously not apply if it were a child with a pattern of irresponsibility at an age where the responsibility was reasonable to expect, but this was a one time instance of a K kid and his parents all forgetting about a special occasion at school.
I don't think OP's DH was completely out of line because I think there's merit to both taking the forgotten PJs and trying to teach the kid that this was a minor thing not worth causing a fuss or a special trip. But if I were OP's DH with only the details provided in the OP I probably would have brought the PJs to the kid.